Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.
"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear getting crushed in November’s election." http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :) |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "W1TEF" wrote in message ... Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong. "Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear getting crushed in November's election." http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :) I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of citizenship. We should be required to pay more. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"W1TEF" wrote in message ... Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong. "Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear getting crushed in November's election." http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :) I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of citizenship. We should be required to pay more. Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry  wrote:
On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: "W1TEF" wrote in message ... Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong. "Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear getting crushed in November's election." http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :) I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of citizenship. We should be required to pay more. Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%. Is that the magic number to offset all of Obama's rampant spending? |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:19:56 -0400, Larry wrote:
Harry ? wrote: On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: "W1TEF" wrote in message ... Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong. "Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear getting crushed in November's election." http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :) I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of citizenship. We should be required to pay more. Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%. Is that the magic number to offset all of Obama's rampant spending? actually george bush spent 9% of GDP his last year in offcie...what obama is now spending |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry" wrote in message ... Harry  wrote: On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: "W1TEF" wrote in message ... Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong. "Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear getting crushed in November's election." http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :) I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of citizenship. We should be required to pay more. Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%. Is that the magic number to offset all of Obama's rampant spending? Fortunately for you, you won't be affected, since 1) you're very poor and 2) you're an idiot. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22/07/2010 6:30 PM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: "W1TEF" wrote in message ... Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong. "Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear getting crushed in November's election." http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :) I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of citizenship. We should be required to pay more. Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%. That is BS. But then, that is why smart money is existing US businesses. -- Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common sense? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:19:16 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 22/07/2010 6:30 PM, Harry ? wrote: On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: "W1TEF" wrote in message ... Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong. "Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear getting crushed in November's election." http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :) I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of citizenship. We should be required to pay more. Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%. That is BS. But then, that is why smart money is existing US businesses. gee. where''s it going? oh. it's not more right wing bull**** |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/07/2010 4:03 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:19:16 -0600, wrote: On 22/07/2010 6:30 PM, Harry ? wrote: On 7/22/10 8:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong. "Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear getting crushed in November's election." http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :) I don't think those making over $250K should be spared the burden of citizenship. We should be required to pay more. Individual income over $250,000 should be taxed at 49%. That is BS. But then, that is why smart money is existing US businesses. gee. where''s it going? oh. it's not more right wing bull**** China, India, Brazil to name a few. Which you pick, owning profitable Tata Motors or Obama Government Motors? -- Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common sense? |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22/07/2010 4:45 PM, W1TEF wrote:
Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong. "Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear getting crushed in November’s election." http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :) And December will be all about VAT! -- Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common sense? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CQ WF3H | General | |||
PING: Wf3h | General |