On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:30:54 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 22/07/2010 4:45 PM, W1TEF wrote:
Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November’s election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

And December will be all about VAT!

yeah. just like 2009 was about confiscation of guns...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:30:54 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 22/07/2010 4:45 PM, W1TEF wrote:
Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November's election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

And December will be all about VAT!

yeah. just like 2009 was about confiscation of guns...

That didn't happen?? Shoot.

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:30:54 -0600,
wrote:


On 22/07/2010 4:45 PM, W1TEF wrote:

Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November’s election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

And December will be all about VAT!

yeah. just like 2009 was about confiscation of guns...



Yeah, like that.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 22/07/2010 4:45 PM, W1TEF wrote:
Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November’s election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

And December will be all about VAT!
--

Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common
sense?

And, you'll continue to be all about STUPID!

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:45:43 -0400, W1TEF wrote:

Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November’s election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

since the rich are irrelevant to the recovery...if they dont steall
ALL trhe money and leave SOME for working people...we'll see what
happens

but this is a lesson to right wingers. you guys invent crap like the
immune system invents antibodies. first it was breitbart and his crap
about the USDA official's racism...

dont you guys learn that faux news lies to you?

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:58:55 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:45:43 -0400, W1TEF wrote:

Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November’s election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

since the rich are irrelevant to the recovery...if they dont steall
ALL trhe money and leave SOME for working people...we'll see what
happens.

Heh - So I take it that all your hollering about the rich raping the
land and citizenry is also not relevant to anything? To be
consistent, if I parse what you say right, the rich should be taxed to
hell and gone to save the little guy and now it's ok as long as
"something" is left for the little guy.

Well, at least you are consistent in your inconsistency.

but this is a lesson to right wingers. you guys invent crap like the
immune system invents antibodies.

Whoa dude - what part about "considering delay of the tax hikes"
didn't you understand. I didn't make that up - thems the facts.

first it was breitbart and his crap
about the USDA official's racism...

What's that got to do with this?

dont you guys learn that faux news lies to you?

You know, believe it or not, I rarely watch FOX news - I generally
watch CBS news if I watch national news at all.

And I repeat - thems the facts - gotta love them facts. :)

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:39:23 -0400, W1TEF wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:58:55 -0400, bpuharic wrote:


since the rich are irrelevant to the recovery...if they dont steall
ALL trhe money and leave SOME for working people...we'll see what
happens.

Heh - So I take it that all your hollering about the rich raping the
land and citizenry is also not relevant to anything? To be
consistent, if I parse what you say right, the rich should be taxed to
hell and gone to save the little guy and now it's ok as long as
"something" is left for the little guy.


uh no. what i said was that the rich, having stolen the entire economy
over the last 30 years, should pay the taxes on what they stole

Well, at least you are consistent in your inconsistency.

whatever. when you put words in peoples' mouths, you generally get the
argument you make

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:10:06 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:39:23 -0400, W1TEF wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:58:55 -0400, bpuharic wrote:


since the rich are irrelevant to the recovery...if they dont steall
ALL trhe money and leave SOME for working people...we'll see what
happens.

Heh - So I take it that all your hollering about the rich raping the
land and citizenry is also not relevant to anything? To be
consistent, if I parse what you say right, the rich should be taxed to
hell and gone to save the little guy and now it's ok as long as
"something" is left for the little guy.

uh no. what i said was that the rich, having stolen the entire economy
over the last 30 years, should pay the taxes on what they stole

But that's not consistent my friend. On the one hand, you want to
confiscate and redistribute the "stolen" wealth and have been loud and
vociferous in arguing for same. Now that those who would do what you
wish appear to have changed their minds for the sake of the "economy",
it's ok because at least something will be left for the little guy.

This is the same tax regime as Bush. On the one hand you despise that
tax structure as "evil" and "stealing", now you appear to be content
that something will be left for the little guy with the exact same
regime.

Which is it?

Well, at least you are consistent in your inconsistency.

whatever. when you put words in peoples' mouths, you generally get the
argument you make

Come on now - that's not correct and you know it. I'm restating, not
verbatim admittedly, your expressed opinions about taxes. I don't
believe that I've distorted your views beyond recognition.

On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 08:06:22 -0400, W1TEF wrote:

On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:10:06 -0400, bpuharic wrote:


uh no. what i said was that the rich, having stolen the entire economy
over the last 30 years, should pay the taxes on what they stole

But that's not consistent my friend. On the one hand, you want to
confiscate and redistribute the "stolen" wealth and have been loud and
vociferous in arguing for same. Now that those who would do what you
wish appear to have changed their minds for the sake of the "economy",
it's ok because at least something will be left for the little guy.

that's the nature of political reality. the right wing will hold the
middle class hostage, refusing to support any effort to support the
middle class.

This is the same tax regime as Bush. On the one hand you despise that
tax structure as "evil" and "stealing", now you appear to be content
that something will be left for the little guy with the exact same
regime.

Which is it?

i'm a realist. the middle class can't afford a tax increase. the
right wing wont let a tax cut pass unless it includes the ultrarich

you need to grow up

bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:45:43 -0400, wrote:


Ok, I'm man enough to admit it - I may be wrong.

"Democrats are considering a plan to delay tax hikes on the wealthy
for two years because the economic recovery is slow and they fear
getting crushed in November’s election."

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/11...hikes-may-wait

Now the question is are you for this or a 'gin it? :)

since the rich are irrelevant to the recovery...if they dont steall
ALL trhe money and leave SOME for working people...we'll see what
happens

but this is a lesson to right wingers. you guys invent crap like the
immune system invents antibodies. first it was breitbart and his crap
about the USDA official's racism...

dont you guys learn that faux news lies to you?


Get a spell checker. It's obvious when you are drunk.