On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:46:30 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:46:49 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:26:58 -0400, W1TEF wrote:

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnal...e-Horizon.aspx

the death tax affects 0.2% of all taxpayers. how is this a 'tsunami'?

and, given the fact that the wealthiest 1% have had a 500% increase
in income in the past 30 years, a 165% increase in taxes is something
they deserve. they screwed the economy. let them p ay for it.

but the right wing sheds its tears for the rich, ignoring completely
the plight of the middle class

You seemed to ignore this part,
The lowest bracket for the personal income tax, for instance, moves up
50% — to 15% from 10%. The next lowest bracket — 25% — will rise to
28%, and the old 28% bracket will be 31%
That smacks the working class and the middle class.

uh no. your figures are simply wrong


http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxe...ket-rates.aspx


looks like the right wing is trying fora propaganda score

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:45:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:56:04 -0400, bpuharic wrote:



uh no. your figures are simply wrong


http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxe...ket-rates.aspx


looks like the right wing is trying fora propaganda score


What part was wrong. You posted the 2010 rates with the Bush tax cuts
in place. If they expire the numbers I posted are right for 2011.

uh no. your source is wrong. there is no tax policy organization
saying that your right wing bull**** is right

http://www.moneybluebook.com/2010-fe...irs-tax-rates/
http://taxes.about.com/od/preparingy...ax-rates_2.htm
http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxe...ket-rates.aspx

no one agrees with your bull**** source. sorry

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:24:46 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:45:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:56:04 -0400, bpuharic wrote:



uh no. your figures are simply wrong


http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxe...ket-rates.aspx


looks like the right wing is trying fora propaganda score


What part was wrong. You posted the 2010 rates with the Bush tax cuts
in place. If they expire the numbers I posted are right for 2011.

uh no. your source is wrong. there is no tax policy organization
saying that your right wing bull**** is right

http://www.moneybluebook.com/2010-fe...irs-tax-rates/
http://taxes.about.com/od/preparingy...ax-rates_2.htm
http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxe...ket-rates.aspx

no one agrees with your bull**** source. sorry

You are talking about what the rates ARE NOW, not what they were
BEFORE THE BUSH TAX CUTS and what they will revert to on Dec 31 2010
What part of this is so hard for you to understand?

They will still be at a historically very low rate, and no one is suggesting
a complete repeal.

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 17:22:26 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

You are talking about what the rates ARE NOW, not what they were
BEFORE THE BUSH TAX CUTS and what they will revert to on Dec 31 2010
What part of this is so hard for you to understand?

They will still be at a historically very low rate, and no one is
suggesting
a complete repeal.


Now who has the crystal ball?
If past performance is any guide, this will be a 2000 page tax bill
that nobody will actually read until about June of 2011

No crystal ball needed. The fact is that they would still be at a low
historically. And, again, nobody is talking about letting it expire in its
entirety. That's just right-wing paranoia. There's even talk among Democrats
of leaving in some of the breaks for the rich.

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:00:43 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:24:46 -0400, bpuharic wrote:


What part was wrong. You posted the 2010 rates with the Bush tax cuts
in place. If they expire the numbers I posted are right for 2011.

uh no. your source is wrong. there is no tax policy organization
saying that your right wing bull**** is right

http://www.moneybluebook.com/2010-fe...irs-tax-rates/
http://taxes.about.com/od/preparingy...ax-rates_2.htm
http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxe...ket-rates.aspx

no one agrees with your bull**** source. sorry

You are talking about what the rates ARE NOW, not what they were
BEFORE THE BUSH TAX CUTS and what they will revert to on Dec 31 2010
What part of this is so hard for you to understand?

they will not revert to this level again for the middle class. and NO
ONE believes they will

except, of course, the tin foil hat crowd