On 11/07/2010 10:14 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:29:39 -0600,
wrote:

O

I do not count service to the country as a negative in a president.

too bad bush didn't have any

Probably in part why he could not catch Osama, and why it is taking
longer than WW II to resolve. Bush turned out to be quite the idiot
jack ass.

But Obama could have chosen to be different, but instead has chosen to
be even a bigger jack ass.

Given he has long since already out debt-spent Bush, and not even 1/2
ways through first term, well, Obama has already accomplished his goal.

Actually, it is a hugely positive to have military service. Less ivory
tower idealism gets to theater if the president has a clue. And Obama
is clueless.

because he's black, no doubt

Your arrogant black supremacy racism say that?

So you think Obama, never raised in American until 12, knows little of
US armed forces, makes a suitable leader of the the US war machine?

and bush? he killed 4400 US troops in a useless war

I believe a bipartizan dem-rep support was given to Bush to go to war.
What part of history is your racist ass forgeting?

so how did he work out?

oh. he's white and rich

You sound like an envious racist. You know envy is considered a sin by
many with morals?


Do you let your kids boat without training too?


--

Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common
sense?