"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 7/11/10 11:29 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 8:52 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 10:49 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 6:25 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 8:23 AM, John H wrote:

More crap.

It isn't crap. Obama captured the racist vote and got elected. What is
hard to understand about that.

Was Obama a war hero? Nope.
Did Obama do anything really notable before being elected? Nope.
Has Obama ran his own sucessful business? Nope
Any background in economics? Nope.
His tenature in the state riddled with corruption. Yep.

So how did he get the vote?

He got a lot of the vote because his opponent was just this side of
senility, and his opponent's running mate was and is an uninformed
moron.

I do not count service to the country as a negative in a president.
Usually people who believe having prior military experience is a
detriment are themselves cowards and selfish ignorant types. No balls.

Actually, it is a hugely positive to have military service. Less ivory
tower idealism gets to theater if the president has a clue. And Obama is
clueless.

So you think Obama, never raised in American until 12, knows little of
US armed forces, makes a suitable leader of the the US war machine?

Do you let your kids boat without training too?


I don't believe McCain's "military experience" counts for much in the 21st
century, and he wussed out big time in torture, considering he was
tortured.

The biggest albatross around his neck may have been Sarah Palin. While she
motivated "the base" of the GOP, she's such a ninny, she turned off a lot
of voters. As she will in 2012 if she is dumb enough to make a go of it.



McCain had a decent shot at being elected until he loosed that idiot on the
nation. I always had thought of him as someone who mostly stood for what was
right about America. Then, he had some kind of mental breakdown in his
obsessive quest to get elected at any cost. He's since gotten more and more
extreme in his views... a disgusting end to a fine career.