On 7/11/10 8:23 AM, John H wrote:


More crap.

On 11/07/2010 6:25 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 8:23 AM, John H wrote:

More crap.

It isn't crap. Obama captured the racist vote and got elected. What is
hard to understand about that.

Was Obama a war hero? Nope.
Did Obama do anything really notable before being elected? Nope.
Has Obama ran his own sucessful business? Nope
Any background in economics? Nope.
His tenature in the state riddled with corruption. Yep.

So how did he get the vote? Simple, promised more than he could deliver
as he could fast talk an audience looking for "free" stuff. And he was
black...

Poor choices for voting for Obama if you ask me. He even had me going
on his side for awhile until I realized he was just full of cheap talk
and could not walk the walk.

Lets hope people become more *rationally* critical of their choices in 2012.
--

Government: We have Liberals (academic idealists), NDP (dreaming
socialists) and Conservative (lawyer scum) but where is the middle class
(common sense)?

On 7/11/10 10:49 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 6:25 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 8:23 AM, John H wrote:

More crap.

It isn't crap. Obama captured the racist vote and got elected. What is
hard to understand about that.

Was Obama a war hero? Nope.
Did Obama do anything really notable before being elected? Nope.
Has Obama ran his own sucessful business? Nope
Any background in economics? Nope.
His tenature in the state riddled with corruption. Yep.

So how did he get the vote?

He got a lot of the vote because his opponent was just this side of
senility, and his opponent's running mate was and is an uninformed moron.

On 11/07/2010 8:52 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 10:49 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 6:25 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 8:23 AM, John H wrote:

More crap.

It isn't crap. Obama captured the racist vote and got elected. What is
hard to understand about that.

Was Obama a war hero? Nope.
Did Obama do anything really notable before being elected? Nope.
Has Obama ran his own sucessful business? Nope
Any background in economics? Nope.
His tenature in the state riddled with corruption. Yep.

So how did he get the vote?

He got a lot of the vote because his opponent was just this side of
senility, and his opponent's running mate was and is an uninformed moron.

I do not count service to the country as a negative in a president.
Usually people who believe having prior military experience is a
detriment are themselves cowards and selfish ignorant types. No balls.

Actually, it is a hugely positive to have military service. Less ivory
tower idealism gets to theater if the president has a clue. And Obama
is clueless.

So you think Obama, never raised in American until 12, knows little of
US armed forces, makes a suitable leader of the the US war machine?

Do you let your kids boat without training too?

--

Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common
sense?

On 7/11/10 11:29 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 8:52 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 10:49 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 6:25 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 8:23 AM, John H wrote:

More crap.

It isn't crap. Obama captured the racist vote and got elected. What is
hard to understand about that.

Was Obama a war hero? Nope.
Did Obama do anything really notable before being elected? Nope.
Has Obama ran his own sucessful business? Nope
Any background in economics? Nope.
His tenature in the state riddled with corruption. Yep.

So how did he get the vote?

He got a lot of the vote because his opponent was just this side of
senility, and his opponent's running mate was and is an uninformed moron.

I do not count service to the country as a negative in a president.
Usually people who believe having prior military experience is a
detriment are themselves cowards and selfish ignorant types. No balls.

Actually, it is a hugely positive to have military service. Less ivory
tower idealism gets to theater if the president has a clue. And Obama is
clueless.

So you think Obama, never raised in American until 12, knows little of
US armed forces, makes a suitable leader of the the US war machine?

Do you let your kids boat without training too?


I don't believe McCain's "military experience" counts for much in the
21st century, and he wussed out big time in torture, considering he
was tortured.

The biggest albatross around his neck may have been Sarah Palin. While
she motivated "the base" of the GOP, she's such a ninny, she turned off
a lot of voters. As she will in 2012 if she is dumb enough to make a go
of it.

On 11/07/2010 9:50 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 11:29 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 8:52 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 10:49 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 6:25 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 8:23 AM, John H wrote:

More crap.

It isn't crap. Obama captured the racist vote and got elected. What is
hard to understand about that.

Was Obama a war hero? Nope.
Did Obama do anything really notable before being elected? Nope.
Has Obama ran his own sucessful business? Nope
Any background in economics? Nope.
His tenature in the state riddled with corruption. Yep.

So how did he get the vote?

He got a lot of the vote because his opponent was just this side of
senility, and his opponent's running mate was and is an uninformed
moron.

I do not count service to the country as a negative in a president.
Usually people who believe having prior military experience is a
detriment are themselves cowards and selfish ignorant types. No balls.

Actually, it is a hugely positive to have military service. Less ivory
tower idealism gets to theater if the president has a clue. And Obama is
clueless.

So you think Obama, never raised in American until 12, knows little of
US armed forces, makes a suitable leader of the the US war machine?

Do you let your kids boat without training too?


I don't believe McCain's "military experience" counts for much in the
21st century, and he wussed out big time in torture, considering he
was tortured.

The biggest albatross around his neck may have been Sarah Palin. While
she motivated "the base" of the GOP, she's such a ninny, she turned off
a lot of voters. As she will in 2012 if she is dumb enough to make a go
of it.

Liberals have more excuses than hades has sinners.

At last McCain knows what he is asking of his troops. Sure beats the
idealistic big mouth...

Sarah was only a liability as democrat smear and FUD went into full
swing. Big bucks behind Obama because McCain might have done some real
corruption cleaning.

One observation about politics that stands out, always consider where
the moeny is coming from, and how much of it. Usually, when you get a
back bench green senator getting the money and support Obama got, it is
because he is the chosen pony. They fear the other guy for the last
thing DC wants is someone with integrity looking at the books.

Have the same problem up here in Canada. While there are more parties,
it boils down to two. If I can chose with money which ones becaome the
party leaders, I in fact don't have to give a damn how the public votes,
I have my man in office.

To a large degree, party politicis makes democracy a ruse. Your two
ponies are selected for you, like it or not.

--

Government has liberals, idealists and lawyers, but where is the common
sense?

"Harry " wrote in message
m...
On 7/11/10 11:29 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 8:52 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 10:49 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 6:25 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 8:23 AM, John H wrote:

More crap.

It isn't crap. Obama captured the racist vote and got elected. What is
hard to understand about that.

Was Obama a war hero? Nope.
Did Obama do anything really notable before being elected? Nope.
Has Obama ran his own sucessful business? Nope
Any background in economics? Nope.
His tenature in the state riddled with corruption. Yep.

So how did he get the vote?

He got a lot of the vote because his opponent was just this side of
senility, and his opponent's running mate was and is an uninformed
moron.

I do not count service to the country as a negative in a president.
Usually people who believe having prior military experience is a
detriment are themselves cowards and selfish ignorant types. No balls.

Actually, it is a hugely positive to have military service. Less ivory
tower idealism gets to theater if the president has a clue. And Obama is
clueless.

So you think Obama, never raised in American until 12, knows little of
US armed forces, makes a suitable leader of the the US war machine?

Do you let your kids boat without training too?


I don't believe McCain's "military experience" counts for much in the 21st
century, and he wussed out big time in torture, considering he was
tortured.

The biggest albatross around his neck may have been Sarah Palin. While she
motivated "the base" of the GOP, she's such a ninny, she turned off a lot
of voters. As she will in 2012 if she is dumb enough to make a go of it.



McCain had a decent shot at being elected until he loosed that idiot on the
nation. I always had thought of him as someone who mostly stood for what was
right about America. Then, he had some kind of mental breakdown in his
obsessive quest to get elected at any cost. He's since gotten more and more
extreme in his views... a disgusting end to a fine career.

Harry ? wrote:
On 7/11/10 11:29 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 8:52 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 10:49 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 6:25 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 8:23 AM, John H wrote:

More crap.

It isn't crap. Obama captured the racist vote and got elected. What is
hard to understand about that.

Was Obama a war hero? Nope.
Did Obama do anything really notable before being elected? Nope.
Has Obama ran his own sucessful business? Nope
Any background in economics? Nope.
His tenature in the state riddled with corruption. Yep.

So how did he get the vote?

He got a lot of the vote because his opponent was just this side of
senility, and his opponent's running mate was and is an uninformed
moron.

I do not count service to the country as a negative in a president.
Usually people who believe having prior military experience is a
detriment are themselves cowards and selfish ignorant types. No balls.

Actually, it is a hugely positive to have military service. Less ivory
tower idealism gets to theater if the president has a clue. And Obama is
clueless.

So you think Obama, never raised in American until 12, knows little of
US armed forces, makes a suitable leader of the the US war machine?

Do you let your kids boat without training too?


I don't believe McCain's "military experience" counts for much in the
21st century, and he wussed out big time in torture, considering he
was tortured.

The biggest albatross around his neck may have been Sarah Palin. While
she motivated "the base" of the GOP, she's such a ninny, she turned off
a lot of voters. As she will in 2012 if she is dumb enough to make a go
of it.



That is one of the most denigrating and insulting thing I've ever heard.
How would you hold up to torture? It is not someone hitting you in the
shoulder one time.
McCain was an Honorable Soldier.
i don't agree with many of his politics but I won't attack his service
and sacrifice.

On 7/11/10 7:49 PM, lil abner wrote:
Harry ? wrote:
On 7/11/10 11:29 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 8:52 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 10:49 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2010 6:25 AM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/11/10 8:23 AM, John H wrote:

More crap.

It isn't crap. Obama captured the racist vote and got elected. What is
hard to understand about that.

Was Obama a war hero? Nope.
Did Obama do anything really notable before being elected? Nope.
Has Obama ran his own sucessful business? Nope
Any background in economics? Nope.
His tenature in the state riddled with corruption. Yep.

So how did he get the vote?

He got a lot of the vote because his opponent was just this side of
senility, and his opponent's running mate was and is an uninformed
moron.

I do not count service to the country as a negative in a president.
Usually people who believe having prior military experience is a
detriment are themselves cowards and selfish ignorant types. No balls.

Actually, it is a hugely positive to have military service. Less ivory
tower idealism gets to theater if the president has a clue. And Obama is
clueless.

So you think Obama, never raised in American until 12, knows little of
US armed forces, makes a suitable leader of the the US war machine?

Do you let your kids boat without training too?


I don't believe McCain's "military experience" counts for much in the
21st century, and he wussed out big time in torture, considering
he was tortured.

The biggest albatross around his neck may have been Sarah Palin. While
she motivated "the base" of the GOP, she's such a ninny, she turned
off a lot of voters. As she will in 2012 if she is dumb enough to make
a go of it.



That is one of the most denigrating and insulting thing I've ever heard.
How would you hold up to torture? It is not someone hitting you in the
shoulder one time.
McCain was an Honorable Soldier.
i don't agree with many of his politics but I won't attack his service
and sacrifice.



D'oh. I wasn't commenting on McCain's bravery while he was in prison,
and what he had to do to survive torture, but, rather, his flip-flopping
on the the torture issue during the Bush mis-administration and later.
He was against torture before he was for it.

On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 19:49:38 -0400, lil abner wrote:


McCain was an Honorable Soldier.
i don't agree with many of his politics but I won't attack his service
and sacrifice.

he was an honorable soldier

he was a dishonorable politician