Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2010
Posts: 884
Default Once again, the military establishment proves...

On 7/13/10 9:27 AM, Harold wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/13/10 9:03 AM, Harold wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...
On 7/13/10 8:26 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"Harry wrote in message
m...
On 7/13/10 7:44 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

You were going to have a mission shift if we went into Afghanistan
in
force. The original plan was a covert hit squad.

Who is "you"? Bush let Rumsfeld dictate a tiny army with no ability
to have
boots on the ground, despite the recommendations from the military.

The rhetorical you.
We are proving a huge army is not much more effective in the
mountains
than a little hit team.

Most people have no concept of what the military is like and what it
requires.

Sure we do. The military is like a garbage disposal in which you pour
$500 to $600 billion a year and then watch your money go down the
drain.

Once we are out of the Bush Recession/Depression, and there are real
jobs around, we need to cut military spending by half, and, at the
same time raise pay and benefits substantially for a much smaller
active duty force that would be better suited for the sort of trouble
and nonsense we face today.

The $300 billion a year we'd save could go to far more important
needs, such as rebuilding infrastructure, funding schools properly,
providing life-long job training for working adults, et cetera.

These days, massive military expenditures get you...nothing.


Helps lifetime senior officers create their own little empires and
makes
the favoured suppliers/contractors filthy rich.


And when they retire, they go to work for the contractors.

Where did you and your little ball licker gain your military expertise?



Some of us read, flajim, and, if you read, you learn about the
machinations of the military-industrial complex.


You are quite the reader, however, to have a balanced, objective point of
view you need to begin reading materials that are not on the approved
reading list provided by your handlers. It must be tough for you stumbling
through life wearing horse blinders. But, on the other hand, what you can't
see won't spook you.
Here's one you can start with that should help loosen the grip your handlers
have on your mind.
http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/book/flajimsucks




Sorry, flajim, but I have no interest in reading tomes from right-wing
**** slingers.

Surely you are not trying to deny that the military and its contractors
wipe each others' asses during and after "service."


  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2010
Posts: 217
Default Once again, the military establishment proves...


"Harry ?" wrote in message
m...
On 7/13/10 9:27 AM, Harold wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/13/10 9:03 AM, Harold wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...
On 7/13/10 8:26 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"Harry wrote in message
m...
On 7/13/10 7:44 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

You were going to have a mission shift if we went into
Afghanistan
in
force. The original plan was a covert hit squad.

Who is "you"? Bush let Rumsfeld dictate a tiny army with no
ability
to have
boots on the ground, despite the recommendations from the
military.

The rhetorical you.
We are proving a huge army is not much more effective in the
mountains
than a little hit team.

Most people have no concept of what the military is like and what
it
requires.

Sure we do. The military is like a garbage disposal in which you
pour
$500 to $600 billion a year and then watch your money go down the
drain.

Once we are out of the Bush Recession/Depression, and there are real
jobs around, we need to cut military spending by half, and, at the
same time raise pay and benefits substantially for a much smaller
active duty force that would be better suited for the sort of
trouble
and nonsense we face today.

The $300 billion a year we'd save could go to far more important
needs, such as rebuilding infrastructure, funding schools properly,
providing life-long job training for working adults, et cetera.

These days, massive military expenditures get you...nothing.


Helps lifetime senior officers create their own little empires and
makes
the favoured suppliers/contractors filthy rich.


And when they retire, they go to work for the contractors.

Where did you and your little ball licker gain your military expertise?



Some of us read, flajim, and, if you read, you learn about the
machinations of the military-industrial complex.


You are quite the reader, however, to have a balanced, objective point of
view you need to begin reading materials that are not on the approved
reading list provided by your handlers. It must be tough for you
stumbling
through life wearing horse blinders. But, on the other hand, what you
can't
see won't spook you.
Here's one you can start with that should help loosen the grip your
handlers
have on your mind.
http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/book/flajimsucks




Sorry, flajim, but I have no interest in reading tomes from right-wing
**** slingers.

Surely you are not trying to deny that the military and its contractors
wipe each others' asses during and after "service."

Change it to public servants, lobbyists, contractors and I will agree.
O'Bama promised he would change all that. That promise was broken within
days, maybe even hours or minutes.
Gotta watch that boy of yours. He's practicing slight of hand but he isn't
very good at it. It would help if you took your blinders off.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Woman proves gun effective jps General 91 August 5th 09 06:51 PM
OT Michael Moore proves he is the sicko Bart ASA 163 July 14th 07 05:49 AM
Google proves MacGregor 26 is flimsy Ellen MacArthur ASA 299 December 16th 06 07:13 PM
Ellen proves the Good Captain Correct! Gilligan ASA 41 February 11th 05 01:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017