Don't ask don't tell
 

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

Don't ask don't tell
 

On 09/07/2010 5:35 AM, Harold wrote:
Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

"You are in the army now, we own your ass!" now has an entirely new
meaning.

Looks like Ben Dover and Phil McCrackin have now enlisted.

Looks like armed forces have to spend a lot more time watching their
privates.

At a court martial, the prosecutor asks "What the hell were you doing
when the Taliban came?" The response will be "Don't ask don't tell".

In this man (or womans) army, you always have to watch your rear.

What the hell was Obama thinking of? The Gay battalion does Dallas?

--
Governemnt debt is tax servitude for the middle class.

Don't ask don't tell
 

On 7/9/10 2:04 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/07/2010 5:35 AM, Harold wrote:
Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

"You are in the army now, we own your ass!" now has an entirely new
meaning.

Looks like Ben Dover and Phil McCrackin have now enlisted.

Looks like armed forces have to spend a lot more time watching their
privates.

At a court martial, the prosecutor asks "What the hell were you doing
when the Taliban came?" The response will be "Don't ask don't tell".

In this man (or womans) army, you always have to watch your rear.

What the hell was Obama thinking of? The Gay battalion does Dallas?



Let's see...

You're a racist...
You're a homophobe...
You're a tool of right-wing extremist media...
You can't come to the United States...
You've been fired from your last few jobs...
You have no boat...
You drive a ****ty car...

If there are many homophobes in the military, they can just not re-up,
or, if they are considering joining, they can take that job at Wal-Mart,
instead.

If the end result is that we end up with a smaller military, that's a
good thing. Fewer wars of convenience, eh?

Don't ask don't tell
 

On 09/07/2010 12:10 PM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/9/10 2:04 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/07/2010 5:35 AM, Harold wrote:
Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

"You are in the army now, we own your ass!" now has an entirely new
meaning.

Looks like Ben Dover and Phil McCrackin have now enlisted.

Looks like armed forces have to spend a lot more time watching their
privates.

At a court martial, the prosecutor asks "What the hell were you doing
when the Taliban came?" The response will be "Don't ask don't tell".

In this man (or womans) army, you always have to watch your rear.

What the hell was Obama thinking of? The Gay battalion does Dallas?



Let's see...

You're a racist...
You're a homophobe...
You're a tool of right-wing extremist media...
You can't come to the United States...
You've been fired from your last few jobs...
You have no boat...
You drive a ****ty car...

If there are many homophobes in the military, they can just not re-up,
or, if they are considering joining, they can take that job at Wal-Mart,
instead.

If the end result is that we end up with a smaller military, that's a
good thing. Fewer wars of convenience, eh?

Hey, you are the skitz tea bagger encyclopedia. Must be a pretty ****ty
experience.

--
Governemnt debt is tax servitude for the middle class.

Don't ask don't tell
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 09/07/2010 5:35 AM, Harold wrote:
Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

"You are in the army now, we own your ass!" now has an entirely new
meaning.

Looks like Ben Dover and Phil McCrackin have now enlisted.

Looks like armed forces have to spend a lot more time watching their
privates.

At a court martial, the prosecutor asks "What the hell were you doing when
the Taliban came?" The response will be "Don't ask don't tell".

In this man (or womans) army, you always have to watch your rear.

What the hell was Obama thinking of? The Gay battalion does Dallas?

--
Governemnt debt is tax servitude for the middle class.

Wow... so, in addition to you being a moron and a racist, you're afraid a
gay guy might look at your penis... Well, I doubt there's much to see. ROFL

Don't ask don't tell
 

Harry  wrote:

You're a homophobe...

You're probably the homophobe, although you'll never get it.

You repeatedly make derogatory comments about men engaging in anal sex,
accusing people you don't like of enjoying it. So often do you reference
it that others have questioned your male homosexual anal fixation.

It may be that you're speaking from experience and now there's a
self-loathing about having engaged in it.

Or, you are the homophobe.

Johnson

Don't ask don't tell
 

On 7/9/10 2:22 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/07/2010 12:10 PM, Harry  wrote:
On 7/9/10 2:04 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/07/2010 5:35 AM, Harold wrote:
Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

"You are in the army now, we own your ass!" now has an entirely new
meaning.

Looks like Ben Dover and Phil McCrackin have now enlisted.

Looks like armed forces have to spend a lot more time watching their
privates.

At a court martial, the prosecutor asks "What the hell were you doing
when the Taliban came?" The response will be "Don't ask don't tell".

In this man (or womans) army, you always have to watch your rear.

What the hell was Obama thinking of? The Gay battalion does Dallas?



Let's see...

You're a racist...
You're a homophobe...
You're a tool of right-wing extremist media...
You can't come to the United States...
You've been fired from your last few jobs...
You have no boat...
You drive a ****ty car...

If there are many homophobes in the military, they can just not re-up,
or, if they are considering joining, they can take that job at Wal-Mart,
instead.

If the end result is that we end up with a smaller military, that's a
good thing. Fewer wars of convenience, eh?

Hey, you are the skitz tea bagger encyclopedia. Must be a pretty ****ty
experience.



I know English and French are official languages in Canada, depending
upon where you are. But...you don't seem to be writing in either.

Perhaps you are whining about my use of "teabaggers" to describe the
misnamed tea party "movement." Tough. Their use of the term "tea party"
is a miscarriage of history.

Don't ask don't tell
 

On 7/9/10 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

One would hope for a sharp decrease in our ability to wage trumped-up
wars, a la George W. Bush.

Don't ask don't tell
 

"Harry ?" wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 2:04 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/07/2010 5:35 AM, Harold wrote:
Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

"You are in the army now, we own your ass!" now has an entirely new
meaning.

Looks like Ben Dover and Phil McCrackin have now enlisted.

Looks like armed forces have to spend a lot more time watching their
privates.

At a court martial, the prosecutor asks "What the hell were you doing
when the Taliban came?" The response will be "Don't ask don't tell".

In this man (or womans) army, you always have to watch your rear.

What the hell was Obama thinking of? The Gay battalion does Dallas?



Let's see...

You're a racist...
You're a homophobe...
You're a tool of right-wing extremist media...
You can't come to the United States...
You've been fired from your last few jobs...
You have no boat...
You drive a ****ty car...

If there are many homophobes in the military, they can just not re-up, or,
if they are considering joining, they can take that job at Wal-Mart,
instead.

If the end result is that we end up with a smaller military, that's a good
thing. Fewer wars of convenience, eh?

You suggest we bring the men and women fighters home and send the fruits
over there to lick the enemy.? Sounds like a plan.

Don't ask don't tell
 

On 7/9/10 5:05 PM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 2:04 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/07/2010 5:35 AM, Harold wrote:
Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

"You are in the army now, we own your ass!" now has an entirely new
meaning.

Looks like Ben Dover and Phil McCrackin have now enlisted.

Looks like armed forces have to spend a lot more time watching their
privates.

At a court martial, the prosecutor asks "What the hell were you doing
when the Taliban came?" The response will be "Don't ask don't tell".

In this man (or womans) army, you always have to watch your rear.

What the hell was Obama thinking of? The Gay battalion does Dallas?



Let's see...

You're a racist...
You're a homophobe...
You're a tool of right-wing extremist media...
You can't come to the United States...
You've been fired from your last few jobs...
You have no boat...
You drive a ****ty car...

If there are many homophobes in the military, they can just not re-up, or,
if they are considering joining, they can take that job at Wal-Mart,
instead.

If the end result is that we end up with a smaller military, that's a good
thing. Fewer wars of convenience, eh?

You suggest we bring the men and women fighters home and send the fruits
over there to lick the enemy.? Sounds like a plan.




Ahhh...you're homophobic, too...surprising, because during your stint in
the navy, you probably spent a lot of time in the showers, bending over
to pick up...soap.

Don't ask don't tell
 

On 7/9/10 5:18 PM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

One would hope for a sharp decrease in our ability to wage trumped-up
wars, a la George W. Bush.

You must be a muslim faggot, Krause. There's no other explqanation.




Dubya's war against Iraq was built on a series of canards. We spend far,
far too much, somewhere near $500 billion a year, on the military. We
could cut that in half and still spend Xtimes more than any other
military power or even combination of powers.

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

Don't ask don't tell
 

"Harry ?" wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

One would hope for a sharp decrease in our ability to wage trumped-up
wars, a la George W. Bush.

You must be a muslim faggot, Krause. There's no other explqanation.

Don't ask don't tell
 

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie
about it.

Don't ask don't tell
 

"Harry ?" wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 5:18 PM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/9/10 4:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

One would hope for a sharp decrease in our ability to wage trumped-up
wars, a la George W. Bush.

You must be a muslim faggot, Krause. There's no other explqanation.




Dubya's war against Iraq was built on a series of canards. We spend far,
far too much, somewhere near $500 billion a year, on the military. We
could cut that in half and still spend Xtimes more than any other military
power or even combination of powers.

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

I guess there's no denying that you are a muslim faggot then.

Don't ask don't tell
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie
about it.


You really are stupid.

Don't ask don't tell
 

On Jul 9, 6:28*pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.

Don't ask don't tell
 

"Harold'" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie about it.


You really are stupid.


Coming from one who has trouble breathing by choice, that's not saying much.

Don't ask don't tell
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.

You are not what anyone would call an egghead. Perhaps an eggshell head...

Don't ask don't tell
 

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.

Taking the 'Palm Sisters' out on the town this weekend?

Don't ask don't tell
 

On 7/9/10 8:12 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:02:46 -0700,
wrote:

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie
about it.

Again, the real vote is not going to be a poll of the general public,
it will be among those who are likely to join the military or those
who might reenlist. That is why Gates sent out those questionnaires he
is in so much trouble over.


Cut the $500 billion we spend on the military in half. Get rid of half
the personnel, keeping only a portion of those who can deal with 21st
Century realities.

Don't ask don't tell
 

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:32:05 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html


The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.

recruitin levels are at an all time high. in fact the USCG is cutting
1000 enlisted because reenlistment is so high


You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

and you cant run one without them either

Don't ask don't tell
 

On Jul 9, 9:34*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:32:05 -0400, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.

recruitin levels are at an all time high. in fact the USCG is cutting
1000 enlisted because reenlistment is so high


A quote:
"But it turns out that while Mr. Dow Jones believes that our Great
Recession is over (that’s a joke), one invisible hand in our market
doesn’t know what the other is doing. Americans are going so broke in
this jobless recovery that instead of finding work in our not-so-happy-
fun-time economy, they’d rather get shot up and shoot at other people
in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other places.

That’s right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."

http://trueslant.com/level/2009/10/1...f-two-numbers/

You see, the uptick in recruiting levels has nothing to do with asking
or telling, but instead it has everything to do with BO's jobless
"recovery". The emporer is spending us into the ground, and even the
teenagers now understand.

We won't know what effect ask/tell has until things change. Until
then, you're blowing smoke. As usual?

Don't ask don't tell
 

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail
liberty and fragged by their fellow troops.

Don't ask don't tell
 

"DAB" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail
liberty and fragged by their fellow troops.

Whew... no homophobe there...

Don't ask don't tell
 

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:15:40 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

On 7/9/10 8:12 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 15:02:46 -0700,
wrote:

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie
about it.

Again, the real vote is not going to be a poll of the general public,
it will be among those who are likely to join the military or those
who might reenlist. That is why Gates sent out those questionnaires he
is in so much trouble over.


Cut the $500 billion we spend on the military in half. Get rid of half
the personnel, keeping only a portion of those who can deal with 21st
Century realities.

It is really more like $696 billion but I do agree with the "half"
part. The problem is, if we are still going to wage war with 14th
century opponents we need some people who are not hindered by reality.
Nobody in their right mind would go up into the mountains of
Afghanistan ... for anything.
Maybe they could exempt certain units from don't ask. That might be a
compromise everyone could live with.

And, God forbid that someone who's gay should serve in the military..

Don't ask don't tell
 

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB
wrote:

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail
liberty and fragged by their fellow troops.

Where are they going to get the homophobes to do the fragging? Who
says that the troops will go outside the law on what is to most a
trivial issue. I think most in the military, like most outside of it,
will mind their own business.I think it would be like race. When I was
in, 40+ years ago, it was your ass if you did anything racist. Nobody
did.

Casady

Don't ask don't tell
 

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:


That’s right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."

http://trueslant.com/level/2009/10/1...f-two-numbers/

You see, the uptick in recruiting levels has nothing to do with asking
or telling, but instead it has everything to do with BO's jobless
"recovery". The emporer is spending us into the ground, and even the
teenagers now understand.

it's funny watching the right spin this. their policies would have
produced 25% unemployment, like 1929. but because obama's black, they
simply think he's wrong.

Don't ask don't tell
 

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote:

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ?
wrote:

As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes
like you.

It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail
liberty and fragged by their fellow troops.

Blanket party time?

I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks,
dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys."
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

Don't ask don't tell
 

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."

http://trueslant.com/level/2009/10/1...f-two-numbers/

You see, the uptick in recruiting levels has nothing to do with asking
or telling, but instead it has everything to do with BO's jobless
"recovery". The emporer is spending us into the ground, and even the
teenagers now understand.

it's funny watching the right spin this. their policies would have
produced 25% unemployment, like 1929.


"but because obama's black, they simply think he's wrong." Cite?

Don't ask don't tell
 

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That’s right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort, which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and
flajim got in.

Don't ask don't tell
 

On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort, which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the draft. I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even write
your own material. What a loser.



I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to
think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited
previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps because
losers like you and herring volunteered.

Don't ask don't tell
 

"Harry ?" wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort, which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the draft. I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even write
your own material. What a loser.

Don't ask don't tell
 

On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:39:20 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."

http://trueslant.com/level/2009/10/1...f-two-numbers/

You see, the uptick in recruiting levels has nothing to do with asking
or telling, but instead it has everything to do with BO's jobless
"recovery". The emporer is spending us into the ground, and even the
teenagers now understand.

it's funny watching the right spin this. their policies would have
produced 25% unemployment, like 1929.


"but because obama's black, they simply think he's wrong." Cite?

the conclusion is left as an excercise for the reader.

Don't ask don't tell
 

On Jul 9, 7:49*pm, "YukonBound" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...





On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...

wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. *But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.

Taking the 'Palm Sisters' out on the town this weekend?

Weirdo. Take it to alt.sexual perversions.

Don't ask don't tell
 

On Jul 10, 9:46*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:39:20 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."

http://trueslant.com/level/2009/10/1...itary-recruitm....

You see, the uptick in recruiting levels has nothing to do with asking
or telling, but instead it has everything to do with BO's jobless
"recovery". *The emporer is spending us into the ground, and even the
teenagers now understand.

it's funny watching the right spin this. *their policies would have
produced 25% unemployment, like 1929.

"but because obama's black, they *simply think he's wrong." *Cite?

the conclusion is left as an excercise for the reader.


It's obvious you can't read, and your conclusions aren't supported or
realistic. You fail.

Don't ask don't tell
 

On 7/10/10 10:07 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort, which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and
flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the draft.
I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even write
your own material. What a loser.



I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to
think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited
previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps because
losers like you and herring volunteered.

"a small percentage"? Is that your estimation?
So you do admit you were eligable for the draft. How did you beat it? And,
by the way, we didn't volunteer.




1. It's not my estimation, it is a matter of fact.

2. I didn't "beat" the draft.

3. I recall herring stating he enlisted. I could be wrong about that. It
doesn't matter, really. Both of you are lucky the military took you in,
since no one else would...

Don't ask don't tell
 

"Harry ?" wrote in message
...
On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort, which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and
flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the draft.
I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even write
your own material. What a loser.



I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to
think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited
previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps because
losers like you and herring volunteered.

"a small percentage"? Is that your estimation?
So you do admit you were eligable for the draft. How did you beat it? And,
by the way, we didn't volunteer.

Don't ask don't tell
 

"Harry ?" wrote in message
m...
On 7/10/10 10:07 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that
our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the
fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort,
which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and
flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the
draft.
I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even
write
your own material. What a loser.



I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to
think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited
previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps because
losers like you and herring volunteered.

"a small percentage"? Is that your estimation?
So you do admit you were eligable for the draft. How did you beat it?
And,
by the way, we didn't volunteer.




1. It's not my estimation, it is a matter of fact.

2. I didn't "beat" the draft.

3. I recall herring stating he enlisted. I could be wrong about that. It
doesn't matter, really. Both of you are lucky the military took you in,
since no one else would...

All wrong. Three strikes! you're out. Come back to play when you have some
facts, bush leaguer

Don't ask don't tell
 

On 7/10/10 10:20 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...
On 7/10/10 10:07 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that
our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the
fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort,
which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and
flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the
draft.
I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even
write
your own material. What a loser.



I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to
think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited
previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps because
losers like you and herring volunteered.

"a small percentage"? Is that your estimation?
So you do admit you were eligable for the draft. How did you beat it?
And,
by the way, we didn't volunteer.




1. It's not my estimation, it is a matter of fact.

2. I didn't "beat" the draft.

3. I recall herring stating he enlisted. I could be wrong about that. It
doesn't matter, really. Both of you are lucky the military took you in,
since no one else would...

All wrong. Three strikes! you're out. Come back to play when you have some
facts, bush leaguer




Maybe I was wrong in thinking you were smarter than Scott or Loogy...

Don't ask don't tell
 

"Harry ?" wrote in message
m...
On 7/10/10 10:20 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...
On 7/10/10 10:07 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that
our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the
fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort,
which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and
flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the
draft.
I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even
write
your own material. What a loser.



I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to
think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited
previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps
because
losers like you and herring volunteered.

"a small percentage"? Is that your estimation?
So you do admit you were eligable for the draft. How did you beat it?
And,
by the way, we didn't volunteer.




1. It's not my estimation, it is a matter of fact.

2. I didn't "beat" the draft.

3. I recall herring stating he enlisted. I could be wrong about that. It
doesn't matter, really. Both of you are lucky the military took you in,
since no one else would...

All wrong. Three strikes! you're out. Come back to play when you have
some
facts, bush leaguer




Maybe I was wrong in thinking you were smarter than Scott or Loogy...

We can't believe anything you say, can we?