| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Don't ask don't tell
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:58:44 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote: On Jul 10, 9:46*am, bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:39:20 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote: "but because obama's black, they *simply think he's wrong." *Cite? the conclusion is left as an excercise for the reader. It's obvious you can't read, and your conclusions aren't supported or realistic. You fail. you kluxers just can't think |
Don't ask don't tell
"Richard Casady" wrote in message ... On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Where are they going to get the homophobes to do the fragging? Who says that the troops will go outside the law on what is to most a trivial issue. I think most in the military, like most outside of it, will mind their own business.I think it would be like race. When I was in, 40+ years ago, it was your ass if you did anything racist. Nobody did. Casady Of course. When the head of the military says it should end, when McCain said he would change it if the military said it should change (of course, now he's pandering to the Palin crowd), when something like 70% of the people think it's stupid, when other countries have shown it's unnecessary, it's time for it to go. |
Don't ask don't tell
"John H" wrote in message ... On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. I can't imagine you having a brain. You're a moron. |
Don't ask don't tell
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Jul 9, 7:49 pm, "YukonBound" wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message .. . On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold" wrote: Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip. http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office. If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades. You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists. Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie about it. You really are stupid. I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's the real deal. The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind. What a waste. Taking the 'Palm Sisters' out on the town this weekend? Weirdo. Take it to alt.sexual perversions. Sounds like you've been there too long! Yikes! |
Don't ask don't tell
|
Don't ask don't tell
On 7/12/10 7:47 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
It's funny to hear Harry bring me up when I can prove I have further education than he, any time he wants to compare diplomas;) Just cause I don't brag. It's evident from your posts that if you completed high school and have a high school diploma, it was because of social promotions. "I can prove I have further education than he..." Now there is a Scott-ism. I believe you mentioned more than once that you completed some car repair course of study. Well, you've got me there...I don't *any* car repair trade school certificates. |
Don't ask don't tell
"Harry " wrote in message ... On 7/12/10 7:47 AM, I am Tosk wrote: It's funny to hear Harry bring me up when I can prove I have further education than he, any time he wants to compare diplomas;) Just cause I don't brag. It's evident from your posts that if you completed high school and have a high school diploma, it was because of social promotions. "I can prove I have further education than he..." Now there is a Scott-ism. I believe you mentioned more than once that you completed some car repair course of study. Well, you've got me there...I don't *any* car repair trade school certificates. Why didn't he stick with that trade? Didn't like getting his hands dirty? |
Don't ask don't tell
On 7/12/10 10:20 AM, YukonBound wrote:
"Harry " wrote in message ... On 7/12/10 7:47 AM, I am Tosk wrote: It's funny to hear Harry bring me up when I can prove I have further education than he, any time he wants to compare diplomas;) Just cause I don't brag. It's evident from your posts that if you completed high school and have a high school diploma, it was because of social promotions. "I can prove I have further education than he..." Now there is a Scott-ism. I believe you mentioned more than once that you completed some car repair course of study. Well, you've got me there...I don't *any* car repair trade school certificates. Why didn't he stick with that trade? Didn't like getting his hands dirty? The customers didn't like the sockets he left inside the cylinder heads. |
Don't ask don't tell
|
Don't ask don't tell
|
Don't ask don't tell
|
Don't ask don't tell
|
Don't ask don't tell
On 7/12/10 2:06 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:26:11 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:26:37 -0400, wrote: Spoofer alert! How would you get a socket "inside the cylinder heads". Drop it down through the carb ... don't ask ;-) That will get it to the top of the head, raise hell with the valve train, but won't make it "inside" the head! I consider the valve port "inside the head". It falls out of that hole when you take the head off and turn it over. ;-) Loogy disagrees with you. Watch out, he'll threaten to come by your house and take you out...or he'll threaten to have his lawyer or the local sheriff come after you. :) You can tell it is Loogy by his dogged, simple-minded literalness, BTW. It's either Loogy or someone with whom he exchanges bodily fluids. |
Don't ask don't tell
In article ,
says... On 7/12/10 2:06 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:26:11 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:26:37 -0400, wrote: Spoofer alert! How would you get a socket "inside the cylinder heads". Drop it down through the carb ... don't ask ;-) That will get it to the top of the head, raise hell with the valve train, but won't make it "inside" the head! I consider the valve port "inside the head". It falls out of that hole when you take the head off and turn it over. ;-) Loogy disagrees with you. Watch out, he'll threaten to come by your house and take you out...or he'll threaten to have his lawyer or the local sheriff come after you. :) You can tell it is Loogy by his dogged, simple-minded literalness, BTW. It's either Loogy or someone with whom he exchanges bodily fluids. WTF are you talking about, spoofer? |
Don't ask don't tell
On Jul 10, 10:20*am, "Harold'" wrote:
"Harry ?" wrote in message m... On 7/10/10 10:07 AM, Harold' wrote: "Harry *wrote in message ... On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote: "Harry * wrote in message news:9aKdnY7mMJbo9qXRnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@earthlin k.com... On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT), wrote: That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal year, driven by economic unease." And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort, which explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and flajim got in. You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the draft. I noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even write your own material. What a loser. I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps because losers like you and herring volunteered. "a small percentage"? Is that your estimation? So you do admit you were eligable for the draft. How did you beat it? And, by the way, we didn't volunteer. 1. It's not my estimation, it is a matter of fact. 2. I didn't "beat" the draft. 3. I recall herring stating he enlisted. I could be wrong about that. It doesn't matter, really. Both of you are lucky the military took you in, since no one else would... All wrong. Three strikes! you're out. Come back to play when you have some facts, bush leaguer His recollection of 'herring stating' is horse****. |
Don't ask don't tell
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H
wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? Yes Sir. I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. |
Don't ask don't tell
"DAB" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? Yes Sir. I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. Really? Why? What are you afraid of? Gays are already serving in the military. Don't look now... |
Don't ask don't tell
"DAB" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? Yes Sir. I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. As long as they do not try to push gayness on the other guys, and do their jobs well, the rest of the military will mostly not care. And the unit will protect their gay if he does his job. Already happens that way in the British military. sure there will be some problems at first, but most units will know if they have a gay in their midst now, and I do not here of fraggings for gayness. Maybe for being an asshole / bad leader, but that has happened for maybe a couple thousand years of military action. |
Don't ask don't tell
Califbill wrote:
"DAB" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? Yes Sir. I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. As long as they do not try to push gayness on the other guys, and do their jobs well, the rest of the military will mostly not care. And the unit will protect their gay if he does his job. Already happens that way in the British military. sure there will be some problems at first, but most units will know if they have a gay in their midst now, and I do not here of fraggings for gayness. Maybe for being an asshole / bad leader, but that has happened for maybe a couple thousand years of military action. Yep. Guys like John and DAB who try to buck policy will get tossed in the stockade/brig for a spell, then washed out of the military. Or they can obey the damned orders and stay. Their choice. Jim - I think queers are unnatural, but know when to keep my mouth shut. |
Don't ask don't tell
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:42:26 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote: "DAB" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? Yes Sir. I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. As long as they do not try to push gayness on the other guys, and do their jobs well, the rest of the military will mostly not care. And the unit will protect their gay if he does his job. Already happens that way in the British military. sure there will be some problems at first, but most units will know if they have a gay in their midst now, and I do not here of fraggings for gayness. Maybe for being an asshole / bad leader, but that has happened for maybe a couple thousand years of military action. I think you may be right, in most cases. It really depends on the gay and how he behaves with regard to his duty and his personal interactions with the rest of his unit. If he's one who is flaunting his gayness in their faces, he won't last long, or his behavior will change. -- I hope your day is simply *SPECTACULAR* !! John H |
Don't ask don't tell
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:56:46 -0500, Jim wrote:
Califbill wrote: "DAB" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? Yes Sir. I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. As long as they do not try to push gayness on the other guys, and do their jobs well, the rest of the military will mostly not care. And the unit will protect their gay if he does his job. Already happens that way in the British military. sure there will be some problems at first, but most units will know if they have a gay in their midst now, and I do not here of fraggings for gayness. Maybe for being an asshole / bad leader, but that has happened for maybe a couple thousand years of military action. Yep. Guys like John and DAB who try to buck policy will get tossed in the stockade/brig for a spell, then washed out of the military. Or they can obey the damned orders and stay. Their choice. Jim - I think queers are unnatural, but know when to keep my mouth shut. You should, perhaps, think before you start with the accusations. -- I hope your day is simply *SPECTACULAR* !! John H |
Don't ask don't tell
"Califbill" wrote in message m... "DAB" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? Yes Sir. I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. As long as they do not try to push gayness on the other guys, and do their jobs well, the rest of the military will mostly not care. And the unit will protect their gay if he does his job. Already happens that way in the British military. sure there will be some problems at first, but most units will know if they have a gay in their midst now, and I do not here of fraggings for gayness. Maybe for being an asshole / bad leader, but that has happened for maybe a couple thousand years of military action. Wow. I agree with Bill... |
Don't ask don't tell
"John H" wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:42:26 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "DAB" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? Yes Sir. I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. As long as they do not try to push gayness on the other guys, and do their jobs well, the rest of the military will mostly not care. And the unit will protect their gay if he does his job. Already happens that way in the British military. sure there will be some problems at first, but most units will know if they have a gay in their midst now, and I do not here of fraggings for gayness. Maybe for being an asshole / bad leader, but that has happened for maybe a couple thousand years of military action. I think you may be right, in most cases. It really depends on the gay and how he behaves with regard to his duty and his personal interactions with the rest of his unit. If he's one who is flaunting his gayness in their faces, he won't last long, or his behavior will change. -- I hope your day is simply *SPECTACULAR* !! John H You're a moron. A lot "depends on the (person" and how "he (or she) behaves. |
Don't ask don't tell
YukonBound wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message ... On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message .. . On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold" wrote: Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip. http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office. If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades. You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists. Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie about it. You really are stupid. I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's the real deal. The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind. What a waste. Taking the 'Palm Sisters' out on the town this weekend? Dumb response. Can't you do a *little* better? |
Don't ask don't tell
D.Duck wrote:
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal year, driven by economic unease." http://trueslant.com/level/2009/10/1...f-two-numbers/ You see, the uptick in recruiting levels has nothing to do with asking or telling, but instead it has everything to do with BO's jobless "recovery". The emporer is spending us into the ground, and even the teenagers now understand. it's funny watching the right spin this. their policies would have produced 25% unemployment, like 1929. "but because obama's black, they simply think he's wrong." Cite? Impossible. Obama isn't black. |
Don't ask don't tell
"Larry" wrote in message ... YukonBound wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message .. . On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold" wrote: Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip. http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office. If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades. You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists. Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie about it. You really are stupid. I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's the real deal. The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind. What a waste. Taking the 'Palm Sisters' out on the town this weekend? Dumb response. Can't you do a *little* better? What are you bucking for...a 'double date' with them? |
Don't ask don't tell
Harry  wrote:
I don't *any* car repair trade school certificates. Say what? |
Don't ask don't tell
Harry wrote:
In articlepYKdnUJGHLMhuKbRnZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d@earthlink .com, says... On 7/12/10 10:20 AM, YukonBound wrote: "Harry wrote in message ... On 7/12/10 7:47 AM, I am Tosk wrote: It's funny to hear Harry bring me up when I can prove I have further education than he, any time he wants to compare diplomas;) Just cause I don't brag. It's evident from your posts that if you completed high school and have a high school diploma, it was because of social promotions. "I can prove I have further education than he..." Now there is a Scott-ism. I believe you mentioned more than once that you completed some car repair course of study. Well, you've got me there...I don't *any* car repair trade school certificates. Why didn't he stick with that trade? Didn't like getting his hands dirty? The customers didn't like the sockets he left inside the cylinder heads. Spoofer alert! How would you get a socket "inside the cylinder heads". Simple, bozo, you lie about it. |
Don't ask don't tell
"Larry" wrote in message ... D.Duck wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack wrote: That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal year, driven by economic unease." http://trueslant.com/level/2009/10/1...f-two-numbers/ You see, the uptick in recruiting levels has nothing to do with asking or telling, but instead it has everything to do with BO's jobless "recovery". The emporer is spending us into the ground, and even the teenagers now understand. it's funny watching the right spin this. their policies would have produced 25% unemployment, like 1929. "but because obama's black, they simply think he's wrong." Cite? Impossible. Obama isn't black. Definitely. You're a moron. |
Don't ask don't tell
In article , LarryG@
81gmail.com says... Harry ? wrote: I don't *any* car repair trade school certificates. Say what? That's how he spells "deflection"... -- Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese! |
Don't ask don't tell
On 7/16/10 10:12 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articleecOdncCgELN9OqLRnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@giganews. com, LarryG@ 81gmail.com says... Harry ? wrote: I don't *any* car repair trade school certificates. Say what? That's how he spells "deflection"... Actually, you were discussing degrees and certificates or something like that, and I pointed out that while I had college degrees, I couldn't compete with you in trade school certificates. So, why aren't you working as a car mechanic? No current skills? |
Don't ask don't tell
YukonBound wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message ... YukonBound wrote: "Jack" wrote in message ... On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... wrote in message .. . On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold" wrote: Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the clip. http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office. If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades. You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists. Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to stop recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military. The point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to lie about it. You really are stupid. I used to think it was a put-on. But unfortunately, like donny, it's the real deal. The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind. What a waste. Taking the 'Palm Sisters' out on the town this weekend? Dumb response. Can't you do a *little* better? What are you bucking for...a 'double date' with them? "bucking for"??? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com