On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort, which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the draft. I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even write
your own material. What a loser.



I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to
think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited
previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps because
losers like you and herring volunteered.

"Harry ?" wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort, which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the draft. I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even write
your own material. What a loser.

On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:39:20 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."

http://trueslant.com/level/2009/10/1...f-two-numbers/

You see, the uptick in recruiting levels has nothing to do with asking
or telling, but instead it has everything to do with BO's jobless
"recovery". The emporer is spending us into the ground, and even the
teenagers now understand.

it's funny watching the right spin this. their policies would have
produced 25% unemployment, like 1929.


"but because obama's black, they simply think he's wrong." Cite?

the conclusion is left as an excercise for the reader.

On Jul 9, 7:49*pm, "YukonBound" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...





On Jul 9, 6:28 pm, "Harold'" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...

wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 07:35:09 -0400, "Harold"
wrote:

Notice the expressions on the military guy's faces at the end of the
clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/01/...ary/index.html

The real vote on this will be at the enlistment office.
If the southern rednecks who make up the core of the infantry do not
show up and the current ones fail to reenlist expect a draft or a
sharp decrease in our ability to wage these crusades.
You can't run a war with interpreters and language specialists.

Since most of the public supports its repeal, I doubt that's going to
stop
recruitment. People act as though there are no gays in the military.
The
point of repealing this is so that those who are there don't have to
lie
about it.

You really are stupid.

I used to think it was a put-on. *But unfortunately, like donny, it's
the real deal.
The old commercial with the egg sizzling in the pan comes to mind.
What a waste.

Taking the 'Palm Sisters' out on the town this weekend?

Weirdo. Take it to alt.sexual perversions.

On Jul 10, 9:46*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:39:20 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT), Jack
wrote:

That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."

http://trueslant.com/level/2009/10/1...itary-recruitm....

You see, the uptick in recruiting levels has nothing to do with asking
or telling, but instead it has everything to do with BO's jobless
"recovery". *The emporer is spending us into the ground, and even the
teenagers now understand.

it's funny watching the right spin this. *their policies would have
produced 25% unemployment, like 1929.

"but because obama's black, they *simply think he's wrong." *Cite?

the conclusion is left as an excercise for the reader.


It's obvious you can't read, and your conclusions aren't supported or
realistic. You fail.

On 7/10/10 10:07 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort, which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and
flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the draft.
I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even write
your own material. What a loser.



I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to
think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited
previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps because
losers like you and herring volunteered.

"a small percentage"? Is that your estimation?
So you do admit you were eligable for the draft. How did you beat it? And,
by the way, we didn't volunteer.




1. It's not my estimation, it is a matter of fact.

2. I didn't "beat" the draft.

3. I recall herring stating he enlisted. I could be wrong about that. It
doesn't matter, really. Both of you are lucky the military took you in,
since no one else would...

"Harry ?" wrote in message
...
On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort, which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and
flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the draft.
I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even write
your own material. What a loser.



I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to
think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited
previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps because
losers like you and herring volunteered.

"a small percentage"? Is that your estimation?
So you do admit you were eligable for the draft. How did you beat it? And,
by the way, we didn't volunteer.

"Harry ?" wrote in message
m...
On 7/10/10 10:07 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that
our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the
fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort,
which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and
flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the
draft.
I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even
write
your own material. What a loser.



I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to
think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited
previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps because
losers like you and herring volunteered.

"a small percentage"? Is that your estimation?
So you do admit you were eligable for the draft. How did you beat it?
And,
by the way, we didn't volunteer.




1. It's not my estimation, it is a matter of fact.

2. I didn't "beat" the draft.

3. I recall herring stating he enlisted. I could be wrong about that. It
doesn't matter, really. Both of you are lucky the military took you in,
since no one else would...

All wrong. Three strikes! you're out. Come back to play when you have some
facts, bush leaguer

On 7/10/10 10:20 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...
On 7/10/10 10:07 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that
our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the
fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort,
which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and
flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the
draft.
I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even
write
your own material. What a loser.



I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to
think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited
previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps because
losers like you and herring volunteered.

"a small percentage"? Is that your estimation?
So you do admit you were eligable for the draft. How did you beat it?
And,
by the way, we didn't volunteer.




1. It's not my estimation, it is a matter of fact.

2. I didn't "beat" the draft.

3. I recall herring stating he enlisted. I could be wrong about that. It
doesn't matter, really. Both of you are lucky the military took you in,
since no one else would...

All wrong. Three strikes! you're out. Come back to play when you have some
facts, bush leaguer




Maybe I was wrong in thinking you were smarter than Scott or Loogy...

"Harry ?" wrote in message
m...
On 7/10/10 10:20 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...
On 7/10/10 10:07 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
...
On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote:
"Harry wrote in message
m...

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT),

wrote:


That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that
our
strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the
fiscal
year, driven by economic unease."



And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort,
which
explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and
flajim
got in.

You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the
draft.
I
noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even
write
your own material. What a loser.



I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to
think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited
previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps
because
losers like you and herring volunteered.

"a small percentage"? Is that your estimation?
So you do admit you were eligable for the draft. How did you beat it?
And,
by the way, we didn't volunteer.




1. It's not my estimation, it is a matter of fact.

2. I didn't "beat" the draft.

3. I recall herring stating he enlisted. I could be wrong about that. It
doesn't matter, really. Both of you are lucky the military took you in,
since no one else would...

All wrong. Three strikes! you're out. Come back to play when you have
some
facts, bush leaguer




Maybe I was wrong in thinking you were smarter than Scott or Loogy...

We can't believe anything you say, can we?