|
Don't ask don't tell
|
Don't ask don't tell
|
Don't ask don't tell
On 7/12/10 2:06 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:26:11 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:26:37 -0400, wrote: Spoofer alert! How would you get a socket "inside the cylinder heads". Drop it down through the carb ... don't ask ;-) That will get it to the top of the head, raise hell with the valve train, but won't make it "inside" the head! I consider the valve port "inside the head". It falls out of that hole when you take the head off and turn it over. ;-) Loogy disagrees with you. Watch out, he'll threaten to come by your house and take you out...or he'll threaten to have his lawyer or the local sheriff come after you. :) You can tell it is Loogy by his dogged, simple-minded literalness, BTW. It's either Loogy or someone with whom he exchanges bodily fluids. |
Don't ask don't tell
In article ,
says... On 7/12/10 2:06 PM, wrote: On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:26:11 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:26:37 -0400, wrote: Spoofer alert! How would you get a socket "inside the cylinder heads". Drop it down through the carb ... don't ask ;-) That will get it to the top of the head, raise hell with the valve train, but won't make it "inside" the head! I consider the valve port "inside the head". It falls out of that hole when you take the head off and turn it over. ;-) Loogy disagrees with you. Watch out, he'll threaten to come by your house and take you out...or he'll threaten to have his lawyer or the local sheriff come after you. :) You can tell it is Loogy by his dogged, simple-minded literalness, BTW. It's either Loogy or someone with whom he exchanges bodily fluids. WTF are you talking about, spoofer? |
Don't ask don't tell
On Jul 10, 10:20*am, "Harold'" wrote:
"Harry ?" wrote in message m... On 7/10/10 10:07 AM, Harold' wrote: "Harry *wrote in message ... On 7/10/10 9:37 AM, Harold' wrote: "Harry * wrote in message news:9aKdnY7mMJbo9qXRnZ2dnUVZ_oCdnZ2d@earthlin k.com... On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 20:42:08 -0700 (PDT), wrote: That's right, the Pentagon reported on this day of Dow 10,000 that our strained Armed Forces have beat their recruiting goals for the fiscal year, driven by economic unease." And once again, the military becomes the employer of last resort, which explains how in their time, losers like herring, bert robbins, and flajim got in. You can't even explain to anyone's satisfaction, how you beat the draft. I noticed how you borroiwed Cheeney's line on ocasion. You can't even write your own material. What a loser. I don't have to explain because I didn't "beat" the draft. You seem to think everyone got drafted back then. As I pointed out and cited previously, a small percentage of eligibles was drafted, perhaps because losers like you and herring volunteered. "a small percentage"? Is that your estimation? So you do admit you were eligable for the draft. How did you beat it? And, by the way, we didn't volunteer. 1. It's not my estimation, it is a matter of fact. 2. I didn't "beat" the draft. 3. I recall herring stating he enlisted. I could be wrong about that. It doesn't matter, really. Both of you are lucky the military took you in, since no one else would... All wrong. Three strikes! you're out. Come back to play when you have some facts, bush leaguer His recollection of 'herring stating' is horse****. |
Don't ask don't tell
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H
wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? Yes Sir. I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. |
Don't ask don't tell
"DAB" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? Yes Sir. I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. Really? Why? What are you afraid of? Gays are already serving in the military. Don't look now... |
Don't ask don't tell
"DAB" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? Yes Sir. I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. As long as they do not try to push gayness on the other guys, and do their jobs well, the rest of the military will mostly not care. And the unit will protect their gay if he does his job. Already happens that way in the British military. sure there will be some problems at first, but most units will know if they have a gay in their midst now, and I do not here of fraggings for gayness. Maybe for being an asshole / bad leader, but that has happened for maybe a couple thousand years of military action. |
Don't ask don't tell
Califbill wrote:
"DAB" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 06:44:31 -0400, John H wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:50:09 -0400, DAB wrote: On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:18:26 -0400, Harry ? wrote: As for gays in the military, it's only an issue for ****head homophobes like you. It'll be an issue when the openly gay fags start getting fantail liberty and fragged by their fellow troops. Blanket party time? Yes Sir. I can't imagine what would happen if an openly gay guy walked into the barracks, dropped his bag on the floor, and said, "Here I am, boys." Oh you can imagine, and so can I. It's the reason why we're both against dropping the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. As long as they do not try to push gayness on the other guys, and do their jobs well, the rest of the military will mostly not care. And the unit will protect their gay if he does his job. Already happens that way in the British military. sure there will be some problems at first, but most units will know if they have a gay in their midst now, and I do not here of fraggings for gayness. Maybe for being an asshole / bad leader, but that has happened for maybe a couple thousand years of military action. Yep. Guys like John and DAB who try to buck policy will get tossed in the stockade/brig for a spell, then washed out of the military. Or they can obey the damned orders and stay. Their choice. Jim - I think queers are unnatural, but know when to keep my mouth shut. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com