On Jul 1, 5:50*am, John H wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:36:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Jun 30, 7:42*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:27:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Jun 30, 7:24 pm, Tim wrote:
http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/in...ump-9-1-on-tak...

Exxon is looking at them. Now will Exxon take over on clean up?

"PB???"
I'm typing bass-akwards again it seems.....

you been to the cod yet?
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

I had some for dinner Sunday,does that count?

I was typing bass-ackwards again, it seems....
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

OK, now we're cooking! Not yet, there was a foul up in the company
paperwork, and some policy changes. and are getting stuff sorted out
for next week. But got the blood work done.

In article b4fb11c8-329c-4a83-94a8-
, says...

On Jul 1, 5:50*am, John H wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:36:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Jun 30, 7:42*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:27:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Jun 30, 7:24 pm, Tim wrote:
http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/in...ump-9-1-on-tak...

Exxon is looking at them. Now will Exxon take over on clean up?

"PB???"
I'm typing bass-akwards again it seems.....

you been to the cod yet?
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

I had some for dinner Sunday,does that count?

I was typing bass-ackwards again, it seems....
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

OK, now we're cooking! Not yet, there was a foul up in the company
paperwork, and some policy changes. and are getting stuff sorted out
for next week. But got the blood work done.

My little buddy Don will be here in a minute to call you out on your
typo. He does that to look smart.

In article b4fb11c8-329c-4a83-94a8-
, says...

On Jul 1, 5:50*am, John H wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:36:39 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Jun 30, 7:42*pm, John H wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:27:20 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Jun 30, 7:24 pm, Tim wrote:
http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/in...ump-9-1-on-tak...

Exxon is looking at them. Now will Exxon take over on clean up?

"PB???"
I'm typing bass-akwards again it seems.....

you been to the cod yet?
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

I had some for dinner Sunday,does that count?

I was typing bass-ackwards again, it seems....
--
John H

All decisions are the result of binary thinking.

OK, now we're cooking! Not yet, there was a foul up in the company
paperwork, and some policy changes. and are getting stuff sorted out
for next week. But got the blood work done.

Wow Tim. Logged in and saw 14 messages on the server, after my filters
went to work, this was the only post left

Still a no show for Iron Horse, but the clip was cool...

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing - We race for cheese!

On 7/1/10 8:34 AM, I am Tosk wrote:

after my filters
went to work, this was the only post left


Bull****...you couldn't filter coffee.

"Harry ?" wrote in message
m...
On 7/1/10 8:34 AM, I am Tosk wrote:

after my filters
went to work, this was the only post left


Bull****...you couldn't filter coffee.

Where is the boating content?

On 30/06/2010 6:24 PM, Tim wrote:
http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/in...tion/19536611/

Exxon is looking at them. Now will Exxon take over on clean up?

I think you mean BP.

My guess is someone big was looking to unload a big quantity of shares
and started a rumour to jump the price. But who knows, might call it
Barack Petroleum. But Obama has been quiet lately. Wonder what is up?

--
We all work for government, they ceased working for us a long time ago.

"Harry" wrote in message
...
My little buddy Don will be here in a minute to call you out on your
typo. He does that to look smart.


Well, I see you haven't found anything yet to make you "look smart"!

In article ,
says...

"Harry" wrote in message
...
My little buddy Don will be here in a minute to call you out on your
typo. He does that to look smart.


Well, I see you haven't found anything yet to make you "look smart"!

Hey, fella. I have my insulting and name calling to make me look smart.
I'm also very cultured and refined.

On 01/07/2010 10:23 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:35:36 -0600,
wrote:

My guess is someone big was looking to unload a big quantity of shares
and started a rumour to jump the price

Sounds more likely. Why would anyone buy PB right now with this open
ended liability hanging over their head. In 6 months they can probably
buy the assets on the court house steps for pennies on the dollar when
BP/US goes bankrupt. I am sure "BP" is actually several corporations,
each doing business in separate parts of the world. I bet they have an
army of lawyers trying to sever these ties so they can isolate their
liability here.

I might buy a whack of BP someday, but not today. I think there is more
downside. Barack Obama is like a pitbul and does not know when to let
go. Might not buy any shares or new investments until that idiot is
neutered or kicked out.

But at some point BP does becomea good deal. Say $18. I would have
said $26 but with dividents suspended makes it a long shot.

--
We all work for government, they ceased working for us a long time ago.

On 30/06/2010 9:00 PM, BAR wrote:
In articled8b275c1-56f6-483f-864e-6480f73afe14
@i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says...

http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/in...tion/19536611/

Exxon is looking at them. Now will Exxon take over on clean up?

Exxon would be stupid to buy BP whole. They should do an assest only
purchase.

Citgo and Venezuela, should make the news shortly say in 2 months.

--
We all work for government, they ceased working for us a long time ago.