To get around the do-nothing feds, AL, MS and LA should tell their
citizens that any money they spend to clean up the spill in state
waters or waters within the state should be directly subtracted from
any federal taxes owed. The state legislatures should decree that the
feds cannot garnish wages or seize any property of such people for non-
payment of said taxes. If the feds want a fight over the clean up, so
be it.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
To get around the do-nothing feds, AL, MS and LA should tell their
citizens that any money they spend to clean up the spill in state
waters or waters within the state should be directly subtracted from
any federal taxes owed. The state legislatures should decree that the
feds cannot garnish wages or seize any property of such people for non-
payment of said taxes. If the feds want a fight over the clean up, so
be it.

Good grief. You're insane.

On 6/17/10 1:03 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
To get around the do-nothing feds, AL, MS and LA should tell their
citizens that any money they spend to clean up the spill in state
waters or waters within the state should be directly subtracted from
any federal taxes owed. The state legislatures should decree that the
feds cannot garnish wages or seize any property of such people for non-
payment of said taxes. If the feds want a fight over the clean up, so
be it.


What your statement says is that you don't know any more about federal
vs. state law than you do about the BP disaster.

On Jun 17, 1:23*pm, Harry wrote:
On 6/17/10 1:03 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

To get around the do-nothing feds, AL, MS and LA should tell their
citizens that any money they spend to clean up the spill in state
waters or waters within the state should be directly subtracted from
any federal taxes owed. *The state legislatures should decree that the
feds cannot garnish wages or seize any property of such people for non-
payment of said taxes. *If the feds want a fight over the clean up, so
be it.

What your statement says is that you don't know any more about federal
vs. state law than you do about the BP disaster.

I am well aware of fed vs state law and I am trying to use this issue
to push back on the feds. If the feds tried to stop the states from
doing this there would be a firestorm of opinion against them which
might end all the dems ideas of a fed takeover.

On 6/17/10 2:52 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:23 pm, wrote:
On 6/17/10 1:03 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

To get around the do-nothing feds, AL, MS and LA should tell their
citizens that any money they spend to clean up the spill in state
waters or waters within the state should be directly subtracted from
any federal taxes owed. The state legislatures should decree that the
feds cannot garnish wages or seize any property of such people for non-
payment of said taxes. If the feds want a fight over the clean up, so
be it.

What your statement says is that you don't know any more about federal
vs. state law than you do about the BP disaster.

I am well aware of fed vs state law and I am trying to use this issue
to push back on the feds. If the feds tried to stop the states from
doing this there would be a firestorm of opinion against them which
might end all the dems ideas of a fed takeover.


You're...insane.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Jun 17, 1:23 pm, Harry wrote:
On 6/17/10 1:03 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

To get around the do-nothing feds, AL, MS and LA should tell their
citizens that any money they spend to clean up the spill in state
waters or waters within the state should be directly subtracted from
any federal taxes owed. The state legislatures should decree that the
feds cannot garnish wages or seize any property of such people for non-
payment of said taxes. If the feds want a fight over the clean up, so
be it.

What your statement says is that you don't know any more about federal
vs. state law than you do about the BP disaster.

I am well aware of fed vs state law and I am trying to use this issue
to push back on the feds. If the feds tried to stop the states from
doing this there would be a firestorm of opinion against them which
might end all the dems ideas of a fed takeover.

Yeah! We don't need gov't oversight for anything. Spill.. I mean Drill baby
drill.

"Harry" wrote in message
m...
On 6/17/10 2:52 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:23 pm, wrote:
On 6/17/10 1:03 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

To get around the do-nothing feds, AL, MS and LA should tell their
citizens that any money they spend to clean up the spill in state
waters or waters within the state should be directly subtracted from
any federal taxes owed. The state legislatures should decree that the
feds cannot garnish wages or seize any property of such people for non-
payment of said taxes. If the feds want a fight over the clean up, so
be it.

What your statement says is that you don't know any more about federal
vs. state law than you do about the BP disaster.

I am well aware of fed vs state law and I am trying to use this issue
to push back on the feds. If the feds tried to stop the states from
doing this there would be a firestorm of opinion against them which
might end all the dems ideas of a fed takeover.


You're...insane.

I think he should apologize to BP. Oh wait....

On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:52:30 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Jun 17, 1:23*pm, Harry wrote:
On 6/17/10 1:03 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

To get around the do-nothing feds, AL, MS and LA should tell their
citizens that any money they spend to clean up the spill in state
waters or waters within the state should be directly subtracted from
any federal taxes owed. *The state legislatures should decree that the
feds cannot garnish wages or seize any property of such people for non-
payment of said taxes. *If the feds want a fight over the clean up, so
be it.

What your statement says is that you don't know any more about federal
vs. state law than you do about the BP disaster.

I am well aware of fed vs state law and I am trying to use this issue
to push back on the feds. If the feds tried to stop the states from
doing this there would be a firestorm of opinion against them which
might end all the dems ideas of a fed takeover.

The noise produced by your cognitive dissonance is worse than any car
crash audio I've ever heard.

On 17/06/2010 11:03 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
To get around the do-nothing feds, AL, MS and LA should tell their
citizens that any money they spend to clean up the spill in state
waters or waters within the state should be directly subtracted from
any federal taxes owed. The state legislatures should decree that the
feds cannot garnish wages or seize any property of such people for non-
payment of said taxes. If the feds want a fight over the clean up, so
be it.

Sounds like a good idea.

Also include the millions of tons of toilets, cars, tires, cans, barrels
(double for radio active or toxic waste), boats, fishing gear nets, old
subway buses, platics, diapers, electronics, lead batteries, quadrouple
for mercury, chrome, DTD.

Hey, last I checked if you went down under in certain places it looked
more like a submerged garbage dump.
--
Taxation, modern day slavery. The loss of economic freedom.

On 17/06/2010 11:10 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
To get around the do-nothing feds, AL, MS and LA should tell their
citizens that any money they spend to clean up the spill in state
waters or waters within the state should be directly subtracted from
any federal taxes owed. The state legislatures should decree that the
feds cannot garnish wages or seize any property of such people for non-
payment of said taxes. If the feds want a fight over the clean up, so
be it.

Good grief. You're insane.


Not really. It takes a geriatric in DC over an hour to get to the
bathroom. Waiting for DC? Dumb, want it done do it yourself.

--
Taxation, modern day slavery. The loss of economic freedom.