"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:57:20 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:49:17 -0400, wrote:


and they would do that BEFORE we nuked them, just as they did in 9/11

you, however, are a craven coward and would just whimper and take it.
typical chickenhawk.

The only thing that continually comes through in your comments is that you
believe everyone that disagrees with what Obama has done is that they are
racist. How do reach that conclusion or is it just wishful thinking on
your
part.

yeah pretty much so when they blame everything, including the war of
1812, on obama...and say NOTHING about bush....

the obvious conclusion is that they approve of rich white guys
screwiing up the country but disapprove of black guys trying to fix
it.


What would your comments (excuses) be if the current POTUS was white
Anglo-Saxon and made the exact same decisions as Obama? And don't say
the
opposition would disappear.

i'd say he's doing a fine job given the ****ty circumstances he was
handed.

and my 2nd choice was hillary clinton. but you guys would be bitching
about her PMS affecting her judgement...

Because someone disagrees with one persons actions and agrees with another's
is no proof whatsoever that they are racist. When someone disagrees with
Bill Clinton and agrees with Bush, are they racist? It appears to me you
just enjoy throwing the "n" word around when you use the racist "excuse".

And what do you mean "you" guys. You're just too quick to pigeon hole
people into categories. You know absolutely nothing of my political
leanings. I'll give you a little hint, I've voted for both sides.

On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:50:43 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:57:20 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


yeah pretty much so when they blame everything, including the war of
1812, on obama...and say NOTHING about bush....

the obvious conclusion is that they approve of rich white guys
screwiing up the country but disapprove of black guys trying to fix
it.


What would your comments (excuses) be if the current POTUS was white
Anglo-Saxon and made the exact same decisions as Obama? And don't say
the
opposition would disappear.

i'd say he's doing a fine job given the ****ty circumstances he was
handed.

and my 2nd choice was hillary clinton. but you guys would be bitching
about her PMS affecting her judgement...

Because someone disagrees with one persons actions and agrees with another's
is no proof whatsoever that they are racist.

it certainly is IF they completely whitewash...so to speak...the
actions of white folks who CAUSED the problems then blame the BLACK
person who's cleaning them up for causing them

it does if you insist, contrary to fact and reason, that obama is a
marxist and a muslim


When someone disagrees with
Bill Clinton and agrees with Bush, are they racist? It appears to me you
just enjoy throwing the "n" word around when you use the racist "excuse".

it appears to me you simply ignore what the racist right claims about
obama...and ignores about bush.


And what do you mean "you" guys. You're just too quick to pigeon hole
people into categories. You know absolutely nothing of my political
leanings. I'll give you a little hint, I've voted for both sides.

that you're prepared to ignore racism when it pops up its hooded head
should give you little comfort

D.Duck wrote:

Because someone disagrees with one persons actions and agrees with
another's is no proof whatsoever that they are racist. When someone
disagrees with Bill Clinton and agrees with Bush, are they racist? It
appears to me you just enjoy throwing the "n" word around when you use
the racist "excuse".

And what do you mean "you" guys. You're just too quick to pigeon hole
people into categories. You know absolutely nothing of my political
leanings. I'll give you a little hint, I've voted for both sides.


I wish Michael Steele was POTUS.
Just so I could see bpuharic's head explode trying to figure out what to
say.

Jim - There's a racist under every bed.

"Jim" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:

Because someone disagrees with one persons actions and agrees with
another's is no proof whatsoever that they are racist. When someone
disagrees with Bill Clinton and agrees with Bush, are they racist? It
appears to me you just enjoy throwing the "n" word around when you use
the racist "excuse".

And what do you mean "you" guys. You're just too quick to pigeon hole
people into categories. You know absolutely nothing of my political
leanings. I'll give you a little hint, I've voted for both sides.


I wish Michael Steele was POTUS.
Just so I could see bpuharic's head explode trying to figure out what to
say.

Jim - There's a racist under every bed.


Be careful what you wish for.

On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:26:52 -0500, Jim wrote:

D.Duck wrote:

Because someone disagrees with one persons actions and agrees with
another's is no proof whatsoever that they are racist. When someone
disagrees with Bill Clinton and agrees with Bush, are they racist? It
appears to me you just enjoy throwing the "n" word around when you use
the racist "excuse".

And what do you mean "you" guys. You're just too quick to pigeon hole
people into categories. You know absolutely nothing of my political
leanings. I'll give you a little hint, I've voted for both sides.


I wish Michael Steele was POTUS.
Just so I could see bpuharic's head explode trying to figure out what to
say.

yeah right. the GOP would NEVER let that happen.