bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:52:41 -0400, wrote:


On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:59:48 -0400, wrote:


unfortunately he failed to take into account, during the campaign, how
truly badly bush would screw things up. even obama couldnt see how
stupid and arrogant the rich white frat boy was


How long will you keep blaming Bush for Obama's failures. He came here
promising to CHANGE things. Nothing changed.

you keep pretending the problems obama faces have nothing to do with
bush

they have EVERYTHING to do with bush. you, from day one, have asserted
taht obama is responsible for ALL the problems we face

that's because obama is black



Right now he is actually on the right of George. He is prosecuting
whistle blowers, reinforcing the ability to ignore habeas corpus and
ramping up the war

he's ramping up the RIGHT war. the one we should have been fighting
all allong...the one your brave canadian troops are fighting with us.

i, unlike you, respect the sacrifices of all allied troops in
afghanistan.

I respect the sacrifice the troops make but I think the people sending
them are morons, Bush and Obama.
We have nothing to win there.

sure we do. the destruction of the people who caused what i personally
saw in new york in sept. of 2001.



Get over the black thing, moron. He's half black and that has nothing
to do with his poor performance.

YukonBound wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"YukonBound" wrote in message
...


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Larry" wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:


"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 17/06/2010 3:28 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:58:53 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:11:27 -0400, bpuharic
wrote:

How many soldiers have come home?

over 50,000 from iraq. i know you right wingers would
prefer they be
used to conquer ANOTHER country and spend ANOTHER
trillion, but that
aint gonna happen

They didn't come home, they went to Afghanistan. That is
another
country Obama does seem content to try to conquer.
How did that work out for the Soviets?

(answer, about the same as Vietnam worked for us)



"Another country"????


I was really referring to Afghanistan but Iran or Pakistan
could be
next the way we are going.
Again, what happened to the "Day one" withdrawal Obama ran on?


Day one? You were expecting he was going to end the wars on
the first
day? When did he say that? I must have missed it.

We're already doing drone attacks in Pakistan trying to get
bin laden.
Do you think we should stop? Obama is pressing for and
already got
international cooperation wrt Iran for sanctions. I think
we've been
restraining Israel from attacking them for a while now.

Not hard to get sanctions on Iran. Even other muslim
countries are worried about the idiots in Iran.

Funny how muslims don't turn in the mass killer eh?

--
Taxation, modern day slavery. The loss of economic freedom.

It's been extremely difficult to get meaningful sanctions. Have
you been living in a hole in the ground??

Funny how you don't turn in all those people who violently
racist. You sure know plenty of them.


Have you noticed you don't have many friends here? Nearly all
of your posts are lame attacks on people who - own boats! You
really should consider leaving or changing your ****ty
attitude. The Harry and Don show doesn't need a guest host.

Who died and left you boss of this newsgroup?
From what I hear, you can't manage your counter at the contractor
supply store.
Where did you hear that, moron? I'm not a manager at any type of
store.

Ah... so that promotion didn't go through... sorry.


I'll have to congratulate Margaret, she's showing some good business
sense and she seems to be a good judge of character.
On the other hand, why does she keep someone like Kruger on staff
greeting the public?

Who's Margaret?


Dan kruger's boss at the contractor supply store where he mans the
front counter.
Kruger also goes by 'Larry' and who knows how many other handles.
Sure, Don. Run with that.

"Larry" wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"YukonBound" wrote in message
...


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Larry" wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:


"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 17/06/2010 3:28 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:58:53 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:11:27 -0400, bpuharic
wrote:

How many soldiers have come home?

over 50,000 from iraq. i know you right wingers would prefer
they be
used to conquer ANOTHER country and spend ANOTHER trillion,
but that
aint gonna happen

They didn't come home, they went to Afghanistan. That is
another
country Obama does seem content to try to conquer.
How did that work out for the Soviets?

(answer, about the same as Vietnam worked for us)



"Another country"????


I was really referring to Afghanistan but Iran or Pakistan
could be
next the way we are going.
Again, what happened to the "Day one" withdrawal Obama ran on?


Day one? You were expecting he was going to end the wars on the
first
day? When did he say that? I must have missed it.

We're already doing drone attacks in Pakistan trying to get bin
laden.
Do you think we should stop? Obama is pressing for and already
got
international cooperation wrt Iran for sanctions. I think we've
been
restraining Israel from attacking them for a while now.

Not hard to get sanctions on Iran. Even other muslim countries
are worried about the idiots in Iran.

Funny how muslims don't turn in the mass killer eh?

--
Taxation, modern day slavery. The loss of economic freedom.

It's been extremely difficult to get meaningful sanctions. Have
you been living in a hole in the ground??

Funny how you don't turn in all those people who violently racist.
You sure know plenty of them.


Have you noticed you don't have many friends here? Nearly all of
your posts are lame attacks on people who - own boats! You really
should consider leaving or changing your ****ty attitude. The
Harry and Don show doesn't need a guest host.

Who died and left you boss of this newsgroup?
From what I hear, you can't manage your counter at the contractor
supply store.
Where did you hear that, moron? I'm not a manager at any type of
store.

Ah... so that promotion didn't go through... sorry.


I'll have to congratulate Margaret, she's showing some good business
sense and she seems to be a good judge of character.
On the other hand, why does she keep someone like Kruger on staff
greeting the public?

Who's Margaret?


Dan kruger's boss at the contractor supply store where he mans the front
counter.
Kruger also goes by 'Larry' and who knows how many other handles.
Sure, Don. Run with that.

Ummm... that would be cut and run with that.

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Larry" wrote in message
...
YukonBound wrote:


"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 17/06/2010 3:28 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:58:53 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:11:27 -0400, bpuharic
wrote:

How many soldiers have come home?

over 50,000 from iraq. i know you right wingers would prefer
they be
used to conquer ANOTHER country and spend ANOTHER trillion, but
that
aint gonna happen

They didn't come home, they went to Afghanistan. That is another
country Obama does seem content to try to conquer.
How did that work out for the Soviets?

(answer, about the same as Vietnam worked for us)



"Another country"????


I was really referring to Afghanistan but Iran or Pakistan could
be
next the way we are going.
Again, what happened to the "Day one" withdrawal Obama ran on?


Day one? You were expecting he was going to end the wars on the
first
day? When did he say that? I must have missed it.

We're already doing drone attacks in Pakistan trying to get bin
laden.
Do you think we should stop? Obama is pressing for and already got
international cooperation wrt Iran for sanctions. I think we've
been
restraining Israel from attacking them for a while now.

Not hard to get sanctions on Iran. Even other muslim countries are
worried about the idiots in Iran.

Funny how muslims don't turn in the mass killer eh?

--
Taxation, modern day slavery. The loss of economic freedom.

It's been extremely difficult to get meaningful sanctions. Have you
been living in a hole in the ground??

Funny how you don't turn in all those people who violently racist.
You sure know plenty of them.


Have you noticed you don't have many friends here? Nearly all of your
posts are lame attacks on people who - own boats! You really should
consider leaving or changing your ****ty attitude. The Harry and Don
show doesn't need a guest host.

Who died and left you boss of this newsgroup?
From what I hear, you can't manage your counter at the contractor
supply store.
Where did you hear that, moron? I'm not a manager at any type of store.

Ah... so that promotion didn't go through... sorry.


Maybe next time. I'll try harder.

Good for you!!

On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:49:17 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:57:19 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:30:33 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:48:49 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

And Bush inherited the war from Clinton who inherited it from Bush.
Your point?

nope. number of troops in iraq under clinton?

zero.

number of US dead in iraq under clinton?

zero.

amount of money spent on the iraq war under clinton?

zero

try again, rush boy.


You must have been stoned during the 90. Do you vaguely remember the
No Fly Zones?

gee. number of troops on the ground? zero

thanks AGAIN for proving me right

number of US troops killed:

zero.

golly, do you often argue against your own position like this?



you keep proving i'm right. thanks. i already knew that


As I said, the Germans did not have any troops in England in 1940
either, were they at war?

number of troops killed by clinton in iraq

zero

thanks for proving me right


We flew sortees over Iraq every day, regularly bombing them.

uh no. the no fly zones were zones where the iraqi airforce was
prohibited from entering. we didn't bomb anyone.


Were you not paying attention? As part of these air patrols we would
shoot at every RADAR that illuminated any of our planes

number of US troops killed: zero

and this was an INTERNATIONAL effort PAID for by the UN. it didn't
cost us anything

bush spent a TRILLION.


It happened a lot and every time we killed somebody.
It was hoped that this would only be some poor RADAR operator but the
Iraqis said we also killed a lot of civilians. Granted Saddam put
these in residential areas but that did not keep us from shooting
HARMs at them.

I know, tough ****, they are just collateral damage.

so saddam killed his own people

thanks. i already knew that


The cost was billions. There were Air National Guard and Regular Air
Force units rotating through Iraq for almost 10 years .

courtesy of an international alliance. that wasnbt the US alone. were
you stoned during the 90's?

The same alliance that gave Bush the go ahead to invade. I was wide
awake. Remember those UN resolutions?

gee. seems the UN disagrees with you. certainly bush interpreted the
UN resolutions that way

after he lied to the UN about WMD's.

and how many did he find there?

oh. none



and yet you focus on obama as if he caused all of these problems and
is uniquely corrupt.


You aren't even awake.
I have consistently said this was a 19 year war involving 4
presidents.

no, you haven't. you h avent mentioned that at all. not a word.

you ONLY mention obama. never bush.

and number of troops killed by clinton:

zero



you're right. i dont give a **** about the afghans and the iraqis. for
one simple reason: i am not a racist

That doesn't compute. You like blacks but hate central Asians. Still
racism.

?? where did you learn your english?

try to learn a few ideas, OK? YOU are a kluxer. YOU hate blacks. YOU
despise the idea a black is pres of the US.

me? i have an indifference to iraqis and afghanis. i dont hate them
at all. they have their lives, i have mine. unfortunately they insist
they want to kill me because i'm not muslim

that's their misfortune.

so YOU hate blacks

I am indifferent to iraqis or afghanis

therefore YOU are the racist


YOU seem to think you know better than they do how to run their
countries and their cultures. me? i say let 'em alone. if they want to
kill each other it's none of my business. they're as smart as i am

you? you have the great white father view. you're gonna go in and
force the natives to obey the great white man.

that's racist

I want us to come home, how does that make anything you said true. You
are just talking gibberish now.

because you're sitting here trying to justify bush's murder of 4400 US
troops and a trillion wasted...comparing it to an international
intervention by clinton

number of US troops killed by clinton in iraq: zero

dollars spent: zero

by bush: 4400 US troops dead

a trillion spent

so tell me how that's clinton's fault, OK?




for a right winger you seem to be a craven coward.

You are awful "brave" with our kid's lives

and you're willing to let evil run rampant as long as the rich are
protected. seems the only time you'll commit lives is in the service
of the rich

Yet you didn't think saddam was evil, amazing.

that's why we probably have a trident sub sitting 500 miles off
pakistan

That is how WWIII would start. Great plan.

really? pakistan has a missile that can reach the US?

got anyh proof?

They don't need a missile. A boat in New York harbor, the Potomac

??you seem to ignore the fact there wont be a pakistan if we hit them
with a trident sub's missiles

DO try to stay on top of things, OK? you just keep embarrassing
yoruself

River or Long Beach would do just fine. The Afghanis are smuggling
tons of heroin into this country every year. A couple hundred pound
bomb would be trivial.

and they would do that BEFORE we nuked them, just as they did in 9/11

you, however, are a craven coward and would just whimper and take it.
typical chickenhawk.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:49:17 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:57:19 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:30:33 -0400, wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 14:48:49 -0400, bpuharic wrote:

And Bush inherited the war from Clinton who inherited it from Bush.
Your point?

nope. number of troops in iraq under clinton?

zero.

number of US dead in iraq under clinton?

zero.

amount of money spent on the iraq war under clinton?

zero

try again, rush boy.


You must have been stoned during the 90. Do you vaguely remember the
No Fly Zones?

gee. number of troops on the ground? zero

thanks AGAIN for proving me right

number of US troops killed:

zero.

golly, do you often argue against your own position like this?



you keep proving i'm right. thanks. i already knew that


As I said, the Germans did not have any troops in England in 1940
either, were they at war?

number of troops killed by clinton in iraq

zero

thanks for proving me right


We flew sortees over Iraq every day, regularly bombing them.

uh no. the no fly zones were zones where the iraqi airforce was
prohibited from entering. we didn't bomb anyone.


Were you not paying attention? As part of these air patrols we would
shoot at every RADAR that illuminated any of our planes

number of US troops killed: zero

and this was an INTERNATIONAL effort PAID for by the UN. it didn't
cost us anything

bush spent a TRILLION.


It happened a lot and every time we killed somebody.
It was hoped that this would only be some poor RADAR operator but the
Iraqis said we also killed a lot of civilians. Granted Saddam put
these in residential areas but that did not keep us from shooting
HARMs at them.

I know, tough ****, they are just collateral damage.

so saddam killed his own people

thanks. i already knew that


The cost was billions. There were Air National Guard and Regular Air
Force units rotating through Iraq for almost 10 years .

courtesy of an international alliance. that wasnbt the US alone. were
you stoned during the 90's?

The same alliance that gave Bush the go ahead to invade. I was wide
awake. Remember those UN resolutions?

gee. seems the UN disagrees with you. certainly bush interpreted the
UN resolutions that way

after he lied to the UN about WMD's.

and how many did he find there?

oh. none



and yet you focus on obama as if he caused all of these problems and
is uniquely corrupt.


You aren't even awake.
I have consistently said this was a 19 year war involving 4
presidents.

no, you haven't. you h avent mentioned that at all. not a word.

you ONLY mention obama. never bush.

and number of troops killed by clinton:

zero



you're right. i dont give a **** about the afghans and the iraqis. for
one simple reason: i am not a racist

That doesn't compute. You like blacks but hate central Asians. Still
racism.

?? where did you learn your english?

try to learn a few ideas, OK? YOU are a kluxer. YOU hate blacks. YOU
despise the idea a black is pres of the US.

me? i have an indifference to iraqis and afghanis. i dont hate them
at all. they have their lives, i have mine. unfortunately they insist
they want to kill me because i'm not muslim

that's their misfortune.

so YOU hate blacks

I am indifferent to iraqis or afghanis

therefore YOU are the racist


YOU seem to think you know better than they do how to run their
countries and their cultures. me? i say let 'em alone. if they want to
kill each other it's none of my business. they're as smart as i am

you? you have the great white father view. you're gonna go in and
force the natives to obey the great white man.

that's racist

I want us to come home, how does that make anything you said true. You
are just talking gibberish now.

because you're sitting here trying to justify bush's murder of 4400 US
troops and a trillion wasted...comparing it to an international
intervention by clinton

number of US troops killed by clinton in iraq: zero

dollars spent: zero

by bush: 4400 US troops dead

a trillion spent

so tell me how that's clinton's fault, OK?




for a right winger you seem to be a craven coward.

You are awful "brave" with our kid's lives

and you're willing to let evil run rampant as long as the rich are
protected. seems the only time you'll commit lives is in the service
of the rich

Yet you didn't think saddam was evil, amazing.

that's why we probably have a trident sub sitting 500 miles off
pakistan

That is how WWIII would start. Great plan.

really? pakistan has a missile that can reach the US?

got anyh proof?

They don't need a missile. A boat in New York harbor, the Potomac

??you seem to ignore the fact there wont be a pakistan if we hit them
with a trident sub's missiles

DO try to stay on top of things, OK? you just keep embarrassing
yoruself

River or Long Beach would do just fine. The Afghanis are smuggling
tons of heroin into this country every year. A couple hundred pound
bomb would be trivial.

and they would do that BEFORE we nuked them, just as they did in 9/11

you, however, are a craven coward and would just whimper and take it.
typical chickenhawk.

The only thing that continually comes through in your comments is that you
believe everyone that disagrees with what Obama has done is that they are
racist. How do reach that conclusion or is it just wishful thinking on your
part.

What would your comments (excuses) be if the current POTUS was white
Anglo-Saxon and made the exact same decisions as Obama? And don't say the
opposition would disappear.

On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:57:20 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:49:17 -0400, wrote:


and they would do that BEFORE we nuked them, just as they did in 9/11

you, however, are a craven coward and would just whimper and take it.
typical chickenhawk.

The only thing that continually comes through in your comments is that you
believe everyone that disagrees with what Obama has done is that they are
racist. How do reach that conclusion or is it just wishful thinking on your
part.

yeah pretty much so when they blame everything, including the war of
1812, on obama...and say NOTHING about bush....

the obvious conclusion is that they approve of rich white guys
screwiing up the country but disapprove of black guys trying to fix
it.


What would your comments (excuses) be if the current POTUS was white
Anglo-Saxon and made the exact same decisions as Obama? And don't say the
opposition would disappear.

i'd say he's doing a fine job given the ****ty circumstances he was
handed.

and my 2nd choice was hillary clinton. but you guys would be bitching
about her PMS affecting her judgement...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:57:20 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:49:17 -0400, wrote:


and they would do that BEFORE we nuked them, just as they did in 9/11

you, however, are a craven coward and would just whimper and take it.
typical chickenhawk.

The only thing that continually comes through in your comments is that you
believe everyone that disagrees with what Obama has done is that they are
racist. How do reach that conclusion or is it just wishful thinking on
your
part.

yeah pretty much so when they blame everything, including the war of
1812, on obama...and say NOTHING about bush....

the obvious conclusion is that they approve of rich white guys
screwiing up the country but disapprove of black guys trying to fix
it.


What would your comments (excuses) be if the current POTUS was white
Anglo-Saxon and made the exact same decisions as Obama? And don't say
the
opposition would disappear.

i'd say he's doing a fine job given the ****ty circumstances he was
handed.

and my 2nd choice was hillary clinton. but you guys would be bitching
about her PMS affecting her judgement...

Because someone disagrees with one persons actions and agrees with another's
is no proof whatsoever that they are racist. When someone disagrees with
Bill Clinton and agrees with Bush, are they racist? It appears to me you
just enjoy throwing the "n" word around when you use the racist "excuse".

And what do you mean "you" guys. You're just too quick to pigeon hole
people into categories. You know absolutely nothing of my political
leanings. I'll give you a little hint, I've voted for both sides.

On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:50:43 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:57:20 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


yeah pretty much so when they blame everything, including the war of
1812, on obama...and say NOTHING about bush....

the obvious conclusion is that they approve of rich white guys
screwiing up the country but disapprove of black guys trying to fix
it.


What would your comments (excuses) be if the current POTUS was white
Anglo-Saxon and made the exact same decisions as Obama? And don't say
the
opposition would disappear.

i'd say he's doing a fine job given the ****ty circumstances he was
handed.

and my 2nd choice was hillary clinton. but you guys would be bitching
about her PMS affecting her judgement...

Because someone disagrees with one persons actions and agrees with another's
is no proof whatsoever that they are racist.

it certainly is IF they completely whitewash...so to speak...the
actions of white folks who CAUSED the problems then blame the BLACK
person who's cleaning them up for causing them

it does if you insist, contrary to fact and reason, that obama is a
marxist and a muslim


When someone disagrees with
Bill Clinton and agrees with Bush, are they racist? It appears to me you
just enjoy throwing the "n" word around when you use the racist "excuse".

it appears to me you simply ignore what the racist right claims about
obama...and ignores about bush.


And what do you mean "you" guys. You're just too quick to pigeon hole
people into categories. You know absolutely nothing of my political
leanings. I'll give you a little hint, I've voted for both sides.

that you're prepared to ignore racism when it pops up its hooded head
should give you little comfort

D.Duck wrote:

Because someone disagrees with one persons actions and agrees with
another's is no proof whatsoever that they are racist. When someone
disagrees with Bill Clinton and agrees with Bush, are they racist? It
appears to me you just enjoy throwing the "n" word around when you use
the racist "excuse".

And what do you mean "you" guys. You're just too quick to pigeon hole
people into categories. You know absolutely nothing of my political
leanings. I'll give you a little hint, I've voted for both sides.


I wish Michael Steele was POTUS.
Just so I could see bpuharic's head explode trying to figure out what to
say.

Jim - There's a racist under every bed.