rec.boats being censored?
 

On 6/14/2010 2:52 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wiley" wrote in message
...
eternal-september seems to have dropped rec.boats from the approved
reading list. If you refresh the news group list you will see that
rec.boats isn't there.

Probably something wrong on your side? Seems fine here. That's what I use.

Did you try to refresh your newsgroup list? Of course you didn't. You
don't know how.

rec.boats being censored?
 

"Wiley" wrote in message
...
On 6/14/2010 2:52 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wiley" wrote in message
...
eternal-september seems to have dropped rec.boats from the approved
reading list. If you refresh the news group list you will see that
rec.boats isn't there.

Probably something wrong on your side? Seems fine here. That's what I
use.

Did you try to refresh your newsgroup list? Of course you didn't. You
don't know how.

As I said, it's fine here.

rec.boats being censored?
 

On 6/14/2010 5:56 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wiley" wrote in message
...
On 6/14/2010 2:52 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wiley" wrote in message
...
eternal-september seems to have dropped rec.boats from the approved
reading list. If you refresh the news group list you will see that
rec.boats isn't there.

Probably something wrong on your side? Seems fine here. That's what I
use.

Did you try to refresh your newsgroup list? Of course you didn't. You
don't know how.

As I said, it's fine here.


As I said, you didn't try to refresh your newsgroup list because you
don't know how.

rec.boats being censored?
 

On Jun 14, 9:53*am, Wiley wrote:
eternal-september seems to have dropped rec.boats from the approved
reading list. If you refresh the news group list you will see that
rec.boats isn't there.

Good! Maybe then the assholes who USE eternal september....wont be
here anymore.....

rec.boats being censored?
 

On Jun 14, 12:55*pm, Tim wrote:
On Jun 14, 8:53*am, Wiley wrote:

eternal-september seems to have dropped rec.boats from the approved
reading list. If you refresh the news group list you will see that
rec.boats isn't there.

I access wil google Groups and it's always here.

I dont' know about any censoring, but it seems that the political hash
has dropped off considerably.

Kinda nice.

But dopey Herrings racist jokes still continue.

rec.boats being censored?
 

"Wiley" wrote in message
...
On 6/14/2010 5:56 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wiley" wrote in message
...
On 6/14/2010 2:52 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:

"Wiley" wrote in message
...
eternal-september seems to have dropped rec.boats from the approved
reading list. If you refresh the news group list you will see that
rec.boats isn't there.

Probably something wrong on your side? Seems fine here. That's what I
use.

Did you try to refresh your newsgroup list? Of course you didn't. You
don't know how.

As I said, it's fine here.


As I said, you didn't try to refresh your newsgroup list because you don't
know how.

Believe what you want. You're an idiot.

rec.boats being censored?
 

On 6/15/10 9:09 AM, Wiley wrote:


**** off.


Gosh...your posts read like you're either loogy or flajim.

Yep...you've got everyone fooled, Wile...er, Wiley.


Let us know when you decide. I'm sure it's important for you to know
who's who.



It doesn't matter...**** by any name still stinks.

Then you need to train your felines to aim for the litter box.


My cats are well-trained. If you're loogy or flajim, you're more like
what we scoop out of the litter boxes.

What's the matter, fella? You so trashed your usual handle(s) here that
no one will pay attention to either loogy or flajim?

Some of us are man enough to post with our real names or initials. And
then there are cowardly pussies like...you.

rec.boats being censored?
 

On Jun 15, 9:15*am, Harry wrote:
On 6/15/10 9:09 AM, Wiley wrote:







**** off.

Gosh...your posts read like you're either loogy or flajim.

Yep...you've got everyone fooled, Wile...er, Wiley.

Let us know when you decide. I'm sure it's important for you to know
who's who.

It doesn't matter...**** by any name still stinks.

Then you need to train your felines to aim for the litter box.

My cats are well-trained. If you're loogy or flajim, you're more like
what we scoop out of the litter boxes.

What's the matter, fella? You so trashed your usual handle(s) here that
no one will pay attention to either loogy or flajim?

Some of us are man enough to post with our real names or initials. And
then there are cowardly pussies like...you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Awwwww, poor Haweey, nobody cares about him so he resorts to spoofing.
Now the tables have turned he wails and carries on like a 7 year old
who was just told to go to bed...;) I love it! Almost makes viewing
through Google worth while once in a while;)

Cry on Harry, you did this to yourself...

rec.boats being censored?
 

On 6/15/10 9:57 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Jun 15, 9:15 am, wrote:
On 6/15/10 9:09 AM, Wiley wrote:







**** off.

Gosh...your posts read like you're either loogy or flajim.

Yep...you've got everyone fooled, Wile...er, Wiley.

Let us know when you decide. I'm sure it's important for you to know
who's who.

It doesn't matter...**** by any name still stinks.

Then you need to train your felines to aim for the litter box.

My cats are well-trained. If you're loogy or flajim, you're more like
what we scoop out of the litter boxes.

What's the matter, fella? You so trashed your usual handle(s) here that
no one will pay attention to either loogy or flajim?

Some of us are man enough to post with our real names or initials. And
then there are cowardly pussies like...you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Awwwww, poor Haweey, nobody cares about him so he resorts to spoofing.
Now the tables have turned he wails and carries on like a 7 year old
who was just told to go to bed...;) I love it! Almost makes viewing
through Google worth while once in a while;)

Cry on Harry, you did this to yourself...


You know, Snotty, if you were the network maven you claim to be, you'd
know that the "spoofers" you claim *I* am aren't me.

But, of course, to know that, you'd have to have to know how to read
headers. And, as a network maven, you can't even do that. Or, if I
recall, properly and easily set up a usenet newsreader client.

You should stick to what you know best:

Chronic unemployment
Stiffing hospitals and medical providers
Maintaining your yard like a junkyard
Exploiting and living through your children
Maintaining your position as the dumbest poster in rec.boats
Displaying your lack of knowledge of just about everything

BTW, whatever happened to your good buddy Loogy? You know, your
intellectual equal, the one who was coming by here to teach me a lesson
this spring. Spring is about over...

rec.boats being censored?
 

On 6/15/10 10:23 AM, moose wrote:
On 6/15/2010 9:15 AM, Harry wrote:
On 6/15/10 9:09 AM, Wiley wrote:


**** off.


Gosh...your posts read like you're either loogy or flajim.

Yep...you've got everyone fooled, Wile...er, Wiley.


Let us know when you decide. I'm sure it's important for you to know
who's who.



It doesn't matter...**** by any name still stinks.

Then you need to train your felines to aim for the litter box.


My cats are well-trained. If you're loogy or flajim, you're more like
what we scoop out of the litter boxes.

What's the matter, fella? You so trashed your usual handle(s) here that
no one will pay attention to either loogy or flajim?

Some of us are man enough to post with our real names or initials. And
then there are cowardly pussies like...you.

So you are saying nom de plume is a coward?
I don't know if she is or not, but one thing is certain. She's a hell of
a lot smarter than you for withholding personal information. What's to
be gained by advertizing yourself on the internet? How many clients do
you figure you lost because of your internet behavior stretching 15
years? You're a fool Krause. You let your narcissism get in the way of
common sense.


A. Nom de plume is not a man. The rules are different for women on the
internet.

B. You're a coward.

C. None.

D. You're a coward. Worth mentioning twice.