| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.zen,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 6/3/2010 4:28 PM, Dutch wrote:
dh@. wrote in message ... On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:16:46 -0700, "Dutch" wrote: dh@. wrote On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 20:46:45 -0700, "Dutch" wrote: dh believes that AR opponents are missing out on the killer argument against vegetarians, that eating meat results in livestock animals getting to experience life, That's an aspect which must necessarily be factored in in order to get a realistic interpretation of the big picture. Yet when I ask you *why* it's necessary you can't provide a direct answer. The answer is that their lives are more significant than their deaths. Goo, of course, cannot say what makes their lives significant in any way. And of course, Goo does not /really/ view their lives as significant - only the products and services they provide. Is that what you say when you are asked to justify killing the neighbour's dog? "His life was more significant than his death". Yeah, that'll go over well. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|