dh@. wrote in message ...
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:16:46 -0700, "Dutch" wrote:

dh@. wrote
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 20:46:45 -0700, "Dutch" wrote:

dh believes that AR opponents are missing out on the killer argument
against
vegetarians, that eating meat results in livestock animals getting to
experience life,

That's an aspect which must necessarily be factored in in
order to get a realistic interpretation of the big picture.

Yet when I ask you *why* it's necessary you can't provide a direct answer.

The answer is that their lives are more significant than
their deaths.

Is that what you say when you are asked to justify killing the neighbour's
dog?

"His life was more significant than his death".

Yeah, that'll go over well.