| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
ping: Plume
Wouldn't it be easier for you if you identified those in rec.boats who
are not idiots in your mind. It would spare you an awful lot of keystrokes. |
ping: Plume
On Thu, 27 May 2010 06:23:24 -0400, John smith wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier for you if you identified those in rec.boats who are not idiots in your mind. It would spare you an awful lot of keystrokes. you concerned about not making the list? |
ping: Plume
On 5/27/10 6:32 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 06:23:24 -0400, John wrote: Wouldn't it be easier for you if you identified those in rec.boats who are not idiots in your mind. It would spare you an awful lot of keystrokes. you concerned about not making the list? He must be concerned about not making the cut, because he keeps changing his handle in an attempt to draw attention. Our two leading idiots, Loogy and Tosk, seem to be blessing us with their almost total absence. I'm thinking of nominating Canuck and Frogwart as temporary replacements for our two really dumb posters. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
ping: Plume
|
ping: Plume
In article , says...
On 5/27/2010 8:35 AM, YukonBound wrote: In articlelsCdnaO9Wfgr0WPWnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@earthlink .com, says... On 5/27/10 6:32 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 06:23:24 -0400, John wrote: Wouldn't it be easier for you if you identified those in rec.boats who are not idiots in your mind. It would spare you an awful lot of keystrokes. you concerned about not making the list? He must be concerned about not making the cut, because he keeps changing his handle in an attempt to draw attention. Our two leading idiots, Loogy and Tosk, seem to be blessing us with their almost total absence. I'm thinking of nominating Canuck and Frogwart as temporary replacements for our two really dumb posters. Good job, fat buddy! You insulted and called almost everyone in rec.boats names at one time. Talk about getting a woody! You, bubonic, jps, and plume provide the stimulus that keeps her Krause going. Stop jerking him off and see if he can handle it on his own. did you catch the double entendre? I'm not very bright, but yes, I did catch it. Why on earth would I quit jerking my fat buddy off? He's about the only person I've got here that will talk to me since I started acting just like him. |
ping: Plume
"John smith" wrote in message ... Wouldn't it be easier for you if you identified those in rec.boats who are not idiots in your mind. It would spare you an awful lot of keystrokes. Wouldn't it be easier if you grew up. You're such a child. You have to put people down to feel like a man. You have to keep changing identities to make yourself heard. |
ping: Plume
On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:43:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: Wouldn't it be easier if you grew up. You're such a child. You have to put people down to feel like a man. Are you talking about Harold? He's not going to like that. Let me ask you a question. Why would a presumably intelligent, educated, professional woman (as you claim to be), hang out here and post off topic? It's supposed to be about boats. |
ping: Plume
On 5/27/10 5:30 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:43:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Wouldn't it be easier if you grew up. You're such a child. You have to put people down to feel like a man. Are you talking about Harold? He's not going to like that. Let me ask you a question. Why would a presumably intelligent, educated, professional woman (as you claim to be), hang out here and post off topic? It's supposed to be about boats. You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. Half the righties here don't have boats or boat... -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
ping: Plume
On 27/05/2010 4:43 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/27/10 6:32 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 06:23:24 -0400, John wrote: Wouldn't it be easier for you if you identified those in rec.boats who are not idiots in your mind. It would spare you an awful lot of keystrokes. you concerned about not making the list? He must be concerned about not making the cut, because he keeps changing his handle in an attempt to draw attention. Our two leading idiots, Loogy and Tosk, seem to be blessing us with their almost total absence. I'm thinking of nominating Canuck and Frogwart as temporary replacements for our two really dumb posters. You don't like anybody do you? Does anybody *like* hk? -- I would rather be a paid up Conservative nut job than a Liberal with no nuts, no job in debt and living off of other people like a leach. |
ping: Plume
On 5/27/10 7:45 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 27/05/2010 4:43 AM, hk wrote: On 5/27/10 6:32 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 06:23:24 -0400, John wrote: Wouldn't it be easier for you if you identified those in rec.boats who are not idiots in your mind. It would spare you an awful lot of keystrokes. you concerned about not making the list? He must be concerned about not making the cut, because he keeps changing his handle in an attempt to draw attention. Our two leading idiots, Loogy and Tosk, seem to be blessing us with their almost total absence. I'm thinking of nominating Canuck and Frogwart as temporary replacements for our two really dumb posters. You don't like anybody do you? Does anybody *like* hk? There's nothing about you, frog, loony or tosk that is worth liking. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
ping: Plume
John smith wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier for you if you identified those in rec.boats who are not idiots in your mind. It would spare you an awful lot of keystrokes. Or ignored them. She exhibits no self control. |
ping: Plume
hk wrote:
On 5/27/10 5:30 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:43:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Wouldn't it be easier if you grew up. You're such a child. You have to put people down to feel like a man. Are you talking about Harold? He's not going to like that. Let me ask you a question. Why would a presumably intelligent, educated, professional woman (as you claim to be), hang out here and post off topic? It's supposed to be about boats. You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. Half the righties here don't have boats or boat... Which half of those damn righties? |
ping: Plume
On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, hk
wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. |
ping: Plume
On 5/27/10 9:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. I might take you seriously if you went after the right-wing crapmeisters...flajim and his various alias, "Larry" and all his aliases, canuck, frogwatch, herring, BAR, et cetera. But, of course, you don't. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
ping: Plume
On Thu, 27 May 2010 21:45:46 -0400, hk
wrote: I might take you seriously if you went after the right-wing crapmeisters...flajim and his various alias, "Larry" and all his aliases, canuck, frogwatch, herring, BAR, et cetera. But, of course, you don't. Not true as several on that list can attest. It's not about politics. There are better forums for that but you would not likely be well received without an attitude change. This is supposed to be about boats and the use thereof. Your trolls inspire more of the same, but that's what you want. [end of discussion] |
ping: Plume
On May 27, 9:45*pm, hk wrote:
On 5/27/10 9:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. * *I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. *The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. *Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. I might take you seriously if you went after the right-wing crapmeisters...flajim and his various alias, "Larry" and all his aliases, canuck, frogwatch, herring, BAR, et cetera. Well, he's gone after them just as much as *you've* gone after the left-wing crapmeisters... like jps, the plum, donny, buffy, old yellow teeth, and let's not leave out you and all your aliases. Give someone a target to shoot for above "0", and let's see what happens. Until then, have another double cheeseburger and tell us another lie about your life. CYA, gone to Hilton Head for the weekend. |
ping: Plume
On 27/05/2010 7:45 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/27/10 9:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. I might take you seriously if you went after the right-wing crapmeisters...flajim and his various alias, "Larry" and all his aliases, canuck, frogwatch, herring, BAR, et cetera. But, of course, you don't. You must be a paranoid delusional liberal. -- I would rather be a paid up Conservative nut job than a Liberal with no nuts, no job in debt and living off of other people like a leach. |
ping: Plume
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, hk wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. Nah... I wasn't offended. It was a fair question. Perhaps you should ask some others also? |
ping: Plume
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:43:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Wouldn't it be easier if you grew up. You're such a child. You have to put people down to feel like a man. Are you talking about Harold? He's not going to like that. Let me ask you a question. Why would a presumably intelligent, educated, professional woman (as you claim to be), hang out here and post off topic? It's supposed to be about boats. Fair question... It's a diversion I suppose. My hours for work are quite varied. At the moment, for example, it's 10 pm, and I'm waiting for someone in Europe to send me something via email. I usually don't post before 10 am Pac. Time., as I'm either asleep or out for a run. Sundays are particularly busy. I'm interested in boats, we're in the market for one (as I've mentioned previously), and I've found that there's a pretty diverse group. Some of the group are much worse than I about posting off-topic, some are much worse at throwing spit-balls at others than I, some are fairly middle of the road and worth chatting with. I thought you were previously, but then I thought you filtered me out. I probably said something that got under your skin. Oh well.... |
ping: Plume
On 5/28/10 2:34 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:43:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Wouldn't it be easier if you grew up. You're such a child. You have to put people down to feel like a man. Are you talking about Harold? He's not going to like that. Let me ask you a question. Why would a presumably intelligent, educated, professional woman (as you claim to be), hang out here and post off topic? It's supposed to be about boats. Fair question... It's a diversion I suppose. My hours for work are quite varied. At the moment, for example, it's 10 pm, and I'm waiting for someone in Europe to send me something via email. I usually don't post before 10 am Pac. Time., as I'm either asleep or out for a run. Sundays are particularly busy. I'm interested in boats, we're in the market for one (as I've mentioned previously), and I've found that there's a pretty diverse group. Some of the group are much worse than I about posting off-topic, some are much worse at throwing spit-balls at others than I, some are fairly middle of the road and worth chatting with. I thought you were previously, but then I thought you filtered me out. I probably said something that got under your skin. Oh well.... It might be a fair question, except it is from w'hine, who likes to insult other posters here, then pretend he doesn't, then complain about other posters. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
ping: Plume
On 5/27/10 10:59 PM, Jack wrote:
On May 27, 9:45 pm, wrote: On 5/27/10 9:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. I might take you seriously if you went after the right-wing crapmeisters...flajim and his various alias, "Larry" and all his aliases, canuck, frogwatch, herring, BAR, et cetera. Well, he's gone after them just as much as *you've* gone after the left-wing crapmeisters... like jps, the plum, donny, buffy, old yellow teeth, and let's not leave out you and all your aliases. Give someone a target to shoot for above "0", and let's see what happens. Until then, have another double cheeseburger and tell us another lie about your life. CYA, gone to Hilton Head for the weekend. So, Jackoff, did you show up here to try to insult me or others, or to tell us that you were heading off to hilton head for the weekend? Maybe you'll see your Republican Family Values governor there, trying to pick up a new girl friend, eh? You certainly didn't show up to tell us about your last boating adventure on that pontoon boat of yours... -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
ping: Plume
On May 28, 5:10*am, hk wrote:
On 5/28/10 2:34 AM, nom=de=plume wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:43:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Wouldn't it be easier if you grew up. You're such a child. You have to put people down to feel like a man. Are you talking about Harold? He's not going to like that. Let me ask you a question. Why would a presumably intelligent, educated, professional woman (as you claim to be), hang out here and post off topic? It's supposed to be about boats. Fair question... It's a diversion I suppose. My hours for work are quite varied. At the moment, for example, it's 10 pm, and I'm waiting for someone in Europe to send me something via email. I usually don't post before 10 am Pac. Time., as I'm either asleep or out for a run. Sundays are particularly busy. I'm interested in boats, we're in the market for one (as I've mentioned previously), and I've found that there's a pretty diverse group. Some of the group are much worse than I about posting off-topic, some are much worse at throwing spit-balls at others than I, some are fairly middle of the road and worth chatting with. I thought you were previously, but then I thought you filtered me out. I probably said something that got under your skin. Oh well.... It might be a fair question, except it is from w'hine, who likes to insult other posters here, then pretend he doesn't, then complain about other posters. Like you have just done and will continue to do, Herr Krause? |
ping: Plume
|
ping: Plume
|
ping: Plume
|
ping: Plume
On 5/27/2010 7:48 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/27/10 7:45 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 27/05/2010 4:43 AM, hk wrote: On 5/27/10 6:32 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 06:23:24 -0400, John wrote: Wouldn't it be easier for you if you identified those in rec.boats who are not idiots in your mind. It would spare you an awful lot of keystrokes. you concerned about not making the list? He must be concerned about not making the cut, because he keeps changing his handle in an attempt to draw attention. Our two leading idiots, Loogy and Tosk, seem to be blessing us with their almost total absence. I'm thinking of nominating Canuck and Frogwart as temporary replacements for our two really dumb posters. You don't like anybody do you? Does anybody *like* hk? There's nothing about you, frog, loony or tosk that is worth liking. But you like me right? I'm so happy. I could give you as big hug, Good Buddy |
ping: Plume
On 5/27/2010 9:45 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/27/10 9:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. I might take you seriously if you went after the right-wing crapmeisters...flajim and his various alias, "Larry" and all his aliases, canuck, frogwatch, herring, BAR, et cetera. But, of course, you don't. And the list goes on--and on--and on. Wayne is too busy having fun on his boat to be castigating us individually. Would it please you if he did a group castigation? |
ping: Plume
On 5/28/2010 1:12 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, hk wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. Nah... I wasn't offended. It was a fair question. Perhaps you should ask some others also? Plume, would you please repeat the question. I must have missed it. |
ping: Plume
On 5/28/2010 2:34 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:43:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Wouldn't it be easier if you grew up. You're such a child. You have to put people down to feel like a man. Are you talking about Harold? He's not going to like that. Let me ask you a question. Why would a presumably intelligent, educated, professional woman (as you claim to be), hang out here and post off topic? It's supposed to be about boats. Fair question... It's a diversion I suppose. My hours for work are quite varied. At the moment, for example, it's 10 pm, and I'm waiting for someone in Europe to send me something via email. I usually don't post before 10 am Pac. Time., as I'm either asleep or out for a run. Sundays are particularly busy. I'm interested in boats, we're in the market for one (as I've mentioned previously), and I've found that there's a pretty diverse group. Some of the group are much worse than I about posting off-topic, some are much worse at throwing spit-balls at others than I, some are fairly middle of the road and worth chatting with. I thought you were previously, but then I thought you filtered me out. I probably said something that got under your skin. Oh well.... I don't see how anyone could be more off topic than you. You're at what, 99.5% OT? And, taking into account the volume of your posts, you are by far the #1 OT poster. Oh well.... Most women your age don't have time for diversions. Perhaps you should have a significant other to spend your idle hours with. |
ping: Plume
On 28/05/2010 12:34 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:43:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Wouldn't it be easier if you grew up. You're such a child. You have to put people down to feel like a man. Are you talking about Harold? He's not going to like that. Let me ask you a question. Why would a presumably intelligent, educated, professional woman (as you claim to be), hang out here and post off topic? It's supposed to be about boats. Fair question... It's a diversion I suppose. My hours for work are quite varied. At the moment, for example, it's 10 pm, and I'm waiting for someone in Europe to send me something via email. I usually don't post before 10 am Pac. Time., as I'm either asleep or out for a run. Sundays are particularly busy. You mean you are a lady of the night? And not any calls? Just a lot pg watching the phone or iPod? I'm interested in boats, we're in the market for one (as I've mentioned previously), and I've found that there's a pretty diverse group. Some of the Is that because welfare types can't have boats? group are much worse than I about posting off-topic, some are much worse at throwing spit-balls at others than I, some are fairly middle of the road and You throw your fair share, and then some. worth chatting with. I thought you were previously, but then I thought you filtered me out. I probably said something that got under your skin. Oh well.... Wouldn't let you touch my skin. -- I would rather be a paid up Conservative nut job than a Liberal with no nuts, no job in debt and living off of other people like a leach. |
ping: Plume
On Fri, 28 May 2010 08:32:16 -0400, Wiley wrote:
On 5/27/2010 9:45 PM, hk wrote: On 5/27/10 9:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. I might take you seriously if you went after the right-wing crapmeisters...flajim and his various alias, "Larry" and all his aliases, canuck, frogwatch, herring, BAR, et cetera. But, of course, you don't. And the list goes on--and on--and on. Wayne is too busy having fun on his boat to be castigating us individually. Would it please you if he did a group castigation? He's sure as **** castigated me individually. (Rightfully so, I might add.) Sometimes self-control is hard to keep a grip on. (For him too, sometimes.) But, in general he's correct. Harry, Donnie, jps, and deplum have one goal in mind. Hell, Harry's even intimated such more than once. But, I'll have to say that it's quite easy to not answer their inane drivel. It's just a damn shame more folks don't do so. -- John H "No, Donnie is not that stupid. He's only *pretending* to be that stupid!" |
ping: Plume
On 5/28/10 11:54 AM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 28 May 2010 08:32:16 -0400, wrote: On 5/27/2010 9:45 PM, hk wrote: On 5/27/10 9:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. I might take you seriously if you went after the right-wing crapmeisters...flajim and his various alias, "Larry" and all his aliases, canuck, frogwatch, herring, BAR, et cetera. But, of course, you don't. And the list goes on--and on--and on. Wayne is too busy having fun on his boat to be castigating us individually. Would it please you if he did a group castigation? He's sure as **** castigated me individually. (Rightfully so, I might add.) Sometimes self-control is hard to keep a grip on. (For him too, sometimes.) But, in general he's correct. Harry, Donnie, jps, and deplum have one goal in mind. Hell, Harry's even intimated such more than once. But, I'll have to say that it's quite easy to not answer their inane drivel. It's just a damn shame more folks don't do so. Your "informative and interesting boating posts" are non-existent, Herring, and therefore are in the same category as those of the rest of the right-wing scumbags here. There's no incentive to write up much for this newsgroup when it is infested with right-wing trolls, most of whom have no boats and no interest in boats. Speaking of boats, have you splashed yours this season? Didn't think so. -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
ping: Plume
"hk" wrote in message m... On 5/28/10 11:54 AM, John H wrote: On Fri, 28 May 2010 08:32:16 -0400, wrote: On 5/27/2010 9:45 PM, hk wrote: On 5/27/10 9:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. I might take you seriously if you went after the right-wing crapmeisters...flajim and his various alias, "Larry" and all his aliases, canuck, frogwatch, herring, BAR, et cetera. But, of course, you don't. And the list goes on--and on--and on. Wayne is too busy having fun on his boat to be castigating us individually. Would it please you if he did a group castigation? He's sure as **** castigated me individually. (Rightfully so, I might add.) Sometimes self-control is hard to keep a grip on. (For him too, sometimes.) But, in general he's correct. Harry, Donnie, jps, and deplum have one goal in mind. Hell, Harry's even intimated such more than once. But, I'll have to say that it's quite easy to not answer their inane drivel. It's just a damn shame more folks don't do so. Your "informative and interesting boating posts" are non-existent, Herring, and therefore are in the same category as those of the rest of the right-wing scumbags here. There's no incentive to write up much for this newsgroup when it is infested with right-wing trolls, most of whom have no boats and no interest in boats. Speaking of boats, have you splashed yours this season? Didn't think so. The only splashing Johnny makes is when he's prancing around the golf club showers, hoping to find a couple of small white balls.. |
ping: Plume
On 5/28/2010 12:00 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/28/10 11:54 AM, John H wrote: On Fri, 28 May 2010 08:32:16 -0400, wrote: On 5/27/2010 9:45 PM, hk wrote: On 5/27/10 9:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. I might take you seriously if you went after the right-wing crapmeisters...flajim and his various alias, "Larry" and all his aliases, canuck, frogwatch, herring, BAR, et cetera. But, of course, you don't. And the list goes on--and on--and on. Wayne is too busy having fun on his boat to be castigating us individually. Would it please you if he did a group castigation? He's sure as **** castigated me individually. (Rightfully so, I might add.) Sometimes self-control is hard to keep a grip on. (For him too, sometimes.) But, in general he's correct. Harry, Donnie, jps, and deplum have one goal in mind. Hell, Harry's even intimated such more than once. But, I'll have to say that it's quite easy to not answer their inane drivel. It's just a damn shame more folks don't do so. Your "informative and interesting boating posts" are non-existent, Herring, and therefore are in the same category as those of the rest of the right-wing scumbags here. There's no incentive to write up much for this newsgroup when it is infested with right-wing trolls, most of whom have no boats and no interest in boats. Speaking of boats, have you splashed yours this season? Didn't think so. I just found a new tag line thanks Kraquse. |
ping: Plume
"Wiley" wrote in message ... On 5/28/2010 2:34 AM, nom=de=plume wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:43:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Wouldn't it be easier if you grew up. You're such a child. You have to put people down to feel like a man. Are you talking about Harold? He's not going to like that. Let me ask you a question. Why would a presumably intelligent, educated, professional woman (as you claim to be), hang out here and post off topic? It's supposed to be about boats. Fair question... It's a diversion I suppose. My hours for work are quite varied. At the moment, for example, it's 10 pm, and I'm waiting for someone in Europe to send me something via email. I usually don't post before 10 am Pac. Time., as I'm either asleep or out for a run. Sundays are particularly busy. I'm interested in boats, we're in the market for one (as I've mentioned previously), and I've found that there's a pretty diverse group. Some of the group are much worse than I about posting off-topic, some are much worse at throwing spit-balls at others than I, some are fairly middle of the road and worth chatting with. I thought you were previously, but then I thought you filtered me out. I probably said something that got under your skin. Oh well.... I don't see how anyone could be more off topic than you. You're at what, 99.5% OT? And, taking into account the volume of your posts, you are by far the #1 OT poster. Oh well.... Most women your age don't have time for diversions. Perhaps you should have a significant other to spend your idle hours with. Too bad for you. I guess you can leave if you want. |
ping: Plume
"Canuck57" wrote in message ... On 28/05/2010 12:34 AM, nom=de=plume wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:43:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Wouldn't it be easier if you grew up. You're such a child. You have to put people down to feel like a man. Are you talking about Harold? He's not going to like that. Let me ask you a question. Why would a presumably intelligent, educated, professional woman (as you claim to be), hang out here and post off topic? It's supposed to be about boats. Fair question... It's a diversion I suppose. My hours for work are quite varied. At the moment, for example, it's 10 pm, and I'm waiting for someone in Europe to send me something via email. I usually don't post before 10 am Pac. Time., as I'm either asleep or out for a run. Sundays are particularly busy. You mean you are a lady of the night? And not any calls? Just a lot pg watching the phone or iPod? I'm interested in boats, we're in the market for one (as I've mentioned previously), and I've found that there's a pretty diverse group. Some of the Is that because welfare types can't have boats? group are much worse than I about posting off-topic, some are much worse at throwing spit-balls at others than I, some are fairly middle of the road and You throw your fair share, and then some. worth chatting with. I thought you were previously, but then I thought you filtered me out. I probably said something that got under your skin. Oh well.... Wouldn't let you touch my skin. -- I would rather be a paid up Conservative nut job than a Liberal with no nuts, no job in debt and living off of other people like a leach. You're an asshole and an idiot. I don't think it can get much worse for you. |
ping: Plume
On 5/28/2010 12:55 PM, Wiley wrote:
On 5/28/2010 12:00 PM, hk wrote: On 5/28/10 11:54 AM, John H wrote: On Fri, 28 May 2010 08:32:16 -0400, wrote: On 5/27/2010 9:45 PM, hk wrote: On 5/27/10 9:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. I might take you seriously if you went after the right-wing crapmeisters...flajim and his various alias, "Larry" and all his aliases, canuck, frogwatch, herring, BAR, et cetera. But, of course, you don't. And the list goes on--and on--and on. Wayne is too busy having fun on his boat to be castigating us individually. Would it please you if he did a group castigation? He's sure as **** castigated me individually. (Rightfully so, I might add.) Sometimes self-control is hard to keep a grip on. (For him too, sometimes.) But, in general he's correct. Harry, Donnie, jps, and deplum have one goal in mind. Hell, Harry's even intimated such more than once. But, I'll have to say that it's quite easy to not answer their inane drivel. It's just a damn shame more folks don't do so. Your "informative and interesting boating posts" are non-existent, Herring, and therefore are in the same category as those of the rest of the right-wing scumbags here. There's no incentive to write up much for this newsgroup when it is infested with right-wing trolls, most of whom have no boats and no interest in boats. Speaking of boats, have you splashed yours this season? Didn't think so. I just found a new tag line thanks Kraquse. how's this? -- If the shoe fits: Your "informative and interesting boating posts" are non-existent, (your name here), and, therefore, are in the same category as those of the rest of the left-wing scumbags here. There's no incentive to write up much for this newsgroup when it is infested with left-wing trolls, most of whom have no boats, no balls, and no interest in boats. Borrowed from HK with slight modification |
ping: Plume
On 5/28/2010 12:53 PM, YukonBound wrote:
"hk" wrote in message m... On 5/28/10 11:54 AM, John H wrote: On Fri, 28 May 2010 08:32:16 -0400, wrote: On 5/27/2010 9:45 PM, hk wrote: On 5/27/10 9:07 PM, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 17:42:56 -0400, wrote: You just can't help yourself, can you, w'hine? You attempt to castigate someone for her posts, and then you do exactly what you accuse her of doing. There was nothing off topic about my post, and I did not attempt to castigate Ms D'Plume. I did castigate her(?). It *is* supposed to be about boats, not righty boats, not lefty boats, not ego trips, just plain old boats. The political crap is getting tiresome and driving a lot of good people away. Even you will need someone to argue with and disparage. I might take you seriously if you went after the right-wing crapmeisters...flajim and his various alias, "Larry" and all his aliases, canuck, frogwatch, herring, BAR, et cetera. But, of course, you don't. And the list goes on--and on--and on. Wayne is too busy having fun on his boat to be castigating us individually. Would it please you if he did a group castigation? He's sure as **** castigated me individually. (Rightfully so, I might add.) Sometimes self-control is hard to keep a grip on. (For him too, sometimes.) But, in general he's correct. Harry, Donnie, jps, and deplum have one goal in mind. Hell, Harry's even intimated such more than once. But, I'll have to say that it's quite easy to not answer their inane drivel. It's just a damn shame more folks don't do so. Your "informative and interesting boating posts" are non-existent, Herring, and therefore are in the same category as those of the rest of the right-wing scumbags here. There's no incentive to write up much for this newsgroup when it is infested with right-wing trolls, most of whom have no boats and no interest in boats. Speaking of boats, have you splashed yours this season? Didn't think so. The only splashing Johnny makes is when he's prancing around the golf club showers, hoping to find a couple of small white balls.. Racist -- If the shoe fits: Your "informative and interesting boating posts" are non-existent, (your name here), and, therefore, are in the same category as those of the rest of the left-wing scumbags here. There's no incentive to write up much for this newsgroup when it is infested with left-wing trolls, most of whom have no boats, no balls, and no interest in boats. Borrowed from HK with slight modification |
ping: Plume
On 5/28/2010 1:04 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Wiley" wrote in message ... On 5/28/2010 2:34 AM, nom=de=plume wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Thu, 27 May 2010 09:43:05 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Wouldn't it be easier if you grew up. You're such a child. You have to put people down to feel like a man. Are you talking about Harold? He's not going to like that. Let me ask you a question. Why would a presumably intelligent, educated, professional woman (as you claim to be), hang out here and post off topic? It's supposed to be about boats. Fair question... It's a diversion I suppose. My hours for work are quite varied. At the moment, for example, it's 10 pm, and I'm waiting for someone in Europe to send me something via email. I usually don't post before 10 am Pac. Time., as I'm either asleep or out for a run. Sundays are particularly busy. I'm interested in boats, we're in the market for one (as I've mentioned previously), and I've found that there's a pretty diverse group. Some of the group are much worse than I about posting off-topic, some are much worse at throwing spit-balls at others than I, some are fairly middle of the road and worth chatting with. I thought you were previously, but then I thought you filtered me out. I probably said something that got under your skin. Oh well.... I don't see how anyone could be more off topic than you. You're at what, 99.5% OT? And, taking into account the volume of your posts, you are by far the #1 OT poster. Oh well.... Most women your age don't have time for diversions. Perhaps you should have a significant other to spend your idle hours with. Too bad for you. I guess you can leave if you want. Watching your postings is more fun than a barrel of monkeys. Why would I leave? -- If the shoe fits: Your "informative and interesting boating posts" are non-existent, (your name here), and, therefore, are in the same category as those of the rest of the left-wing scumbags here. There's no incentive to write up much for this newsgroup when it is infested with left-wing trolls, most of whom have no boats, no balls, and no interest in boats. Borrowed from HK with slight modification |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:48 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com