On 5/9/10 10:19 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/05/2010 6:55 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 5/8/10 11:46 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when you
were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any
better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups then getting stuck with the bill happened to me once too
many. So I changed my friends, making sure they were not into self
pity,
loser mentality, sub-life slugs and now enjoy it much more.

Can't soar with the eagles when sitting at the bottom getting blood
sucked.



The only way a loser like you could soar with the eagles would be if
you were roadkill, they fed upon you, and flew home some of your
pieces to regurgitate into the mouths of their nestlings.


That would be a bitter meal indeed!

Yep, especiailly since I am in part a carnivor. Had rib-eye last night.
But I suspect we eagles and lions would leave the hk, pbuharic and
de-fumers for the vultures.


Eagles and lions? You're a little putz who lives north of the board.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:16:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/05/2010 4:34 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:46:48 -0600,
wrote:

On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when you were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups

to the right wing, 100,000,000 hard working americans are 'screw ups'.

Majority of them yes, worshiping debt and Obama is not good.

ROFLMAO!! and how did bush treat them? like a baby treats a diaper!
give 8,000,000 of them pink slips. boosted spending more than any
other president in history. spent a TRILLION on a useless war

how'd that work out?

Obama is
just the idiot they chose to appease the sheep, keeps them in line.

uh huh. and what did bush do for them? nothing. you right wingers
think the US economy is failing if unemployment's not at 25%.

bush tortured US citizens. you guys say that's OK. he locked up
americans without trial. right wingers think that'st great

obama is black. that's the ONLY reason you hate him

Hard to believe, but in some ways we see eye to eye, just that you think
Obama is some kind of saviour when he is just another piece in the game
to manage the herd.

i don't think he's a savior. i think he's the least objectionable
choice.


Obama was picked as he could sell a good line of bull****.

and how would palin have worked out? once mccain had a fatal stroke,
you feel palin would have done a fine job defending the rights of
working folks?

she's never done it in her history. but she's defended the rich. to
you that's all that matters

On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:20:11 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/05/2010 4:36 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:36:42 -0600,
wrote:



And true. That is why business are not starting up hiring,

guess he's too busy lying to notice business created 200,000 jobs last
month...the most in years..

But this story will be far over the heads of our liberal weasels. They
do not have the cranial capacity to understand it.


biggest spenders in history: conservatives

Your problem is you have to get the facts right first. Obviously you can't.

your problem is the only fact you care about is the fact
unemployment's not at 25%. you have blinders on

On 09/05/2010 8:25 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/9/10 10:19 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/05/2010 6:55 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 5/8/10 11:46 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when
you
were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any
better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups then getting stuck with the bill happened to me once too
many. So I changed my friends, making sure they were not into self
pity,
loser mentality, sub-life slugs and now enjoy it much more.

Can't soar with the eagles when sitting at the bottom getting blood
sucked.



The only way a loser like you could soar with the eagles would be if
you were roadkill, they fed upon you, and flew home some of your
pieces to regurgitate into the mouths of their nestlings.


That would be a bitter meal indeed!

Yep, especiailly since I am in part a carnivor. Had rib-eye last night.
But I suspect we eagles and lions would leave the hk, pbuharic and
de-fumers for the vultures.


Eagles and lions? You're a little putz who lives north of the board.

Border not board.

Sure beats being a sheep.

--
There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are
counting on it.

On 09/05/2010 8:29 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:20:11 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/05/2010 4:36 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:36:42 -0600,
wrote:



And true. That is why business are not starting up hiring,

guess he's too busy lying to notice business created 200,000 jobs last
month...the most in years..

But this story will be far over the heads of our liberal weasels. They
do not have the cranial capacity to understand it.


biggest spenders in history: conservatives

Your problem is you have to get the facts right first. Obviously you can't.

your problem is the only fact you care about is the fact
unemployment's not at 25%. you have blinders on

Actually, i would like unemployment to be 3%. Everybody wins. But it
will not happen for at least a decade maybe 2 or 3. he reality is the
US government is bankrupt and floundering like a fish on a hot deck.

The statists think they can maintain the ponzi debt management to
prosperity, but as we can see, the age old adage, "You can't debt-spend
your way out of debt!" is reality.

Obamanomics is a bust, an utter failure. Sad joke on Americans. DC
corruption gone mad. Obama has almost already spent about what Reagan
and Bush spent in 16 years but did it in 2!

Unadjusted, unemployment will hit 25++% and it might be as early as this
fall. The more the government debt-spends and taxes, the worse it will get.
--
There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are
counting on it.

On 5/9/2010 10:25 AM, hk wrote:
On 5/9/10 10:19 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/05/2010 6:55 AM, YukonBound wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 5/8/10 11:46 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when
you
were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any
better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups then getting stuck with the bill happened to me once too
many. So I changed my friends, making sure they were not into self
pity,
loser mentality, sub-life slugs and now enjoy it much more.

Can't soar with the eagles when sitting at the bottom getting blood
sucked.



The only way a loser like you could soar with the eagles would be if
you were roadkill, they fed upon you, and flew home some of your
pieces to regurgitate into the mouths of their nestlings.


That would be a bitter meal indeed!

Yep, especiailly since I am in part a carnivor. Had rib-eye last night.
But I suspect we eagles and lions would leave the hk, pbuharic and
de-fumers for the vultures.


Eagles and lions? You're a little putz who lives north of the board.


Whose board? What board?

On 09/05/2010 8:29 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:20:11 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/05/2010 4:36 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:36:42 -0600,
wrote:



And true. That is why business are not starting up hiring,

guess he's too busy lying to notice business created 200,000 jobs last
month...the most in years..

But this story will be far over the heads of our liberal weasels. They
do not have the cranial capacity to understand it.


biggest spenders in history: conservatives

Your problem is you have to get the facts right first. Obviously you can't.

your problem is the only fact you care about is the fact
unemployment's not at 25%. you have blinders on

Real unemplyment is closer to 25% than 3%. I don't like the government
adjusted numbers.

Even I did a double take when big mouth bull****ing Obama said it was
better, unemplyment from 9.7 to 9.9. What is that fool think he is
doing? Has not Obama any integrity at all?

And it was supposed to be a hiring month...whew... no wonder the market
tanked on Thursday. Saw right through Obama/democrat bull****.

--
There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are
counting on it.

On May 9, 8:25*am, Canuck57 wrote:
On 09/05/2010 8:29 AM, bpuharic wrote:



On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:20:11 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/05/2010 4:36 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:36:42 -0600,
wrote:

And true. *That is why business are not starting up hiring,

guess he's too busy lying to notice business created 200,000 jobs last
month...the most in years..

But this story will be far over the heads of our liberal weasels. *They
do not have the cranial capacity to understand it.

biggest spenders in history: conservatives

Your problem is you have to get the facts right first. *Obviously you can't.

your problem is the only fact you care about is the fact
unemployment's not at 25%. you have blinders on

Real unemplyment is closer to 25% than 3%. *I don't like the government
adjusted numbers.

Even I did a double take when big mouth bull****ing Obama said it was
better, unemplyment from 9.7 to 9.9. *What is that fool think he is
doing? *Has not Obama any integrity at all?

And it was supposed to be a hiring month...whew... no wonder the market
tanked on Thursday. *Saw right through Obama/democrat bull****.

--
There is a sucker born every minute, liberals and our politicians are
counting on it.

Those of us who would normally be doing stuff that generates jobs are
now sitting back (and going to the bahamas) and shaking our heads at
the stupidity of those who complain about the lack of jobs. Why
should we take chances so they can then punish us for creating jobs?
No thanks, I'll figure out ways to do stuff without any more workers
or simply not do stuff that requires workers. Whoa, triple dip
recession due to Obamonomics stupidity. Obama does not care about
Americans, he has done nearly nothing and goes golfing while Nashville
floods under the greatest disaster TN has had since the Civil war.
Economic expansion is now taking place overseas and those of us who
want to do stuff are working with businesses over there, screw the
Demomorons.

On Sun, 09 May 2010 09:17:07 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/05/2010 8:29 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:20:11 -0600,
wrote:

your problem is the only fact you care about is the fact
unemployment's not at 25%. you have blinders on

Actually, i would like unemployment to be 3%

except, of course, the economic policies you push would drive
unemployment to 25%.


The statists think they can maintain the ponzi debt management to
prosperity, but as we can see, the age old adage, "You can't debt-spend
your way out of debt!" is reality.

the conservatives are the statists. they cut taxes on the rich, passed
the bill to the middle class and creates socialism for the rich


Obamanomics is a bust, an utter failure

you mean because the economy is growing? strange definition of failure
you have. guess you forgot that bush spent us into a depression and
spent a trillion on a useless war

.. Sad joke on Americans. DC
corruption gone mad. Obama has almost already spent about what Reagan
and Bush spent in 16 years but did it in 2!

guess you don't know what happens during a depression, do you?
figures. right whiners value ideology over facts


Unadjusted, unemployment will hit 25++% and it might be as early as this
fall. The more the government debt-spends and taxes, the worse it will get.

again you don't know what happens to unemployment when a depression
ends, do you? you think it initially goes down

it does not. it goes up. but you're a right winger so are unable to
understand.

On Sun, 09 May 2010 09:25:03 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/05/2010 8:29 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:20:11 -0600,
wrote:


Your problem is you have to get the facts right first. Obviously you can't.

your problem is the only fact you care about is the fact
unemployment's not at 25%. you have blinders on

Real unemplyment is closer to 25% than 3%. I don't like the government
adjusted numbers.

real unemployment under bush, then, was over 15%. and it's rocketed up
because of the bush depression.


Even I did a double take when big mouth bull****ing Obama said it was
better, unemplyment from 9.7 to 9.9. What is that fool think he is
doing? Has not Obama any integrity at all?

guess you think unemployment goes down when a depression ends.

it does not. in fact it's standard economics: when a depression ends
unemployment goes UP because more discouraged people re-enter the
workforce

but you're too stupid to understand that.


And it was supposed to be a hiring month...whew... no wonder the market
tanked on Thursday. Saw right through Obama/democrat bull****.

the economy created more jobs last month than any month in 4 years.

but, again, you're too stupid to see that.