On Sun, 09 May 2010 08:16:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/05/2010 4:34 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2010 21:46:48 -0600,
wrote:

On 08/05/2010 7:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

If the 2 richest guys were in the 91% bracket, like they were when you were
born, there probably wouldn't be a problem. Your economist isn't any better
at drama that he is at economics.

I can say this is true from personal experience. Going out for beers
(and meals) and listening to excuses, envy, embitterment, self pitty
from screwups

to the right wing, 100,000,000 hard working americans are 'screw ups'.

Majority of them yes, worshiping debt and Obama is not good.

ROFLMAO!! and how did bush treat them? like a baby treats a diaper!
give 8,000,000 of them pink slips. boosted spending more than any
other president in history. spent a TRILLION on a useless war

how'd that work out?

Obama is
just the idiot they chose to appease the sheep, keeps them in line.

uh huh. and what did bush do for them? nothing. you right wingers
think the US economy is failing if unemployment's not at 25%.

bush tortured US citizens. you guys say that's OK. he locked up
americans without trial. right wingers think that'st great

obama is black. that's the ONLY reason you hate him

Hard to believe, but in some ways we see eye to eye, just that you think
Obama is some kind of saviour when he is just another piece in the game
to manage the herd.

i don't think he's a savior. i think he's the least objectionable
choice.


Obama was picked as he could sell a good line of bull****.

and how would palin have worked out? once mccain had a fatal stroke,
you feel palin would have done a fine job defending the rights of
working folks?

she's never done it in her history. but she's defended the rich. to
you that's all that matters