On 5/4/10 4:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:
On 4-May-2010, wrote:

Prove it


That doesn't take a lot of effort.
http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2133


You're dealing with Boatless Flajim there, whose wife left him for a
cucumber.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

On May 4, 4:31*pm, hk wrote:
On 5/4/10 4:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

On *4-May-2010, *wrote:

Prove it

That doesn't take a lot of effort.
http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2133

You're dealing with Boatless Flajim there, whose wife left him for a
cucumber.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

A. Boater: What a silly propaganda article. They repeatedly mention
the herring yet both NOAA and the AK fisheries commission says herring
had record catches 3 years AFTER the spill and then were reduced to
25% probably due to overfishing.
NOAA says you can find oil under th sand and in tidal pools but they
also show data on the oil and find that because the volatile
components are gone that its toxicity is low enough for organisms to
live with it. This is why the sediment fauna is slowly recovering
(once again, see the NOAA data). Of course, there are species that
rely on herring that was overfished. Draw a linear trend through the
data and you get 50 years for recovery to pre-spill. In reality,
populations do not grow linearly, the grow exponentially so we should
probably expect recovery to pre-spill within 30 years from now.

In the Gulf of Mexico, where the UV index gives nearly 3X the amount
of UV light and there is a lot more bio-degradation, we should expect
a recovery at 6X the rate as in AK.
Data ALWAYS trumps emotionalism.

On 5/4/10 4:45 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On May 4, 4:31 pm, wrote:
On 5/4/10 4:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:

On 4-May-2010, wrote:

Prove it

That doesn't take a lot of effort.
http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2133

You're dealing with Boatless Flajim there, whose wife left him for a
cucumber.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

A. Boater: What a silly propaganda article. They repeatedly mention
the herring yet both NOAA and the AK fisheries commission says herring
had record catches 3 years AFTER the spill and then were reduced to
25% probably due to overfishing.
NOAA says you can find oil under th sand and in tidal pools but they
also show data on the oil and find that because the volatile
components are gone that its toxicity is low enough for organisms to
live with it. This is why the sediment fauna is slowly recovering
(once again, see the NOAA data). Of course, there are species that
rely on herring that was overfished. Draw a linear trend through the
data and you get 50 years for recovery to pre-spill. In reality,
populations do not grow linearly, the grow exponentially so we should
probably expect recovery to pre-spill within 30 years from now.

In the Gulf of Mexico, where the UV index gives nearly 3X the amount
of UV light and there is a lot more bio-degradation, we should expect
a recovery at 6X the rate as in AK.
Data ALWAYS trumps emotionalism.


Well, what the hell, just 30 years. snerk

Your attempts to minimize the disaster make you like like more of a
lunatic than thought.



--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

On 5/4/2010 4:31 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/4/10 4:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:
On 4-May-2010, wrote:

Prove it


That doesn't take a lot of effort.
http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2133


You're dealing with Boatless Flajim there, whose wife left him for a
cucumber.

A.Boater is one of your many aliases; is it not?

On 5/4/10 5:39 PM, anon-e-moose wrote:
On 5/4/2010 4:31 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/4/10 4:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:
On 4-May-2010, wrote:

Prove it


That doesn't take a lot of effort.
http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2133


You're dealing with Boatless Flajim there, whose wife left him for a
cucumber.

A.Boater is one of your many aliases; is it not?


Nope. Sorry, ****-for-brains, it isn't me. Maybe it is a result of your
months of ID spoofing here.

It is only happenstance that I opened this post of yours. Usually, I
simply skip over your posts, as all you are here is a right-wing troll.

Flajim - no wife, no job, no kids, no boat. It really must suck to be
you, eh? No wonder you behave like the ultimate asshole here.

Perhaps you could adopt Loogy. He's got potential to be your sort of moron.

--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

On 5/4/2010 5:49 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/4/10 5:39 PM, anon-e-moose wrote:
On 5/4/2010 4:31 PM, hk wrote:
On 5/4/10 4:27 PM, A.Boater wrote:
On 4-May-2010, wrote:

Prove it


That doesn't take a lot of effort.
http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2133


You're dealing with Boatless Flajim there, whose wife left him for a
cucumber.

A.Boater is one of your many aliases; is it not?


Nope. Sorry, ****-for-brains, it isn't me. Maybe it is a result of your
months of ID spoofing here.

It is only happenstance that I opened this post of yours. Usually, I
simply skip over your posts, as all you are here is a right-wing troll.

Flajim - no wife, no job, no kids, no boat. It really must suck to be
you, eh? No wonder you behave like the ultimate asshole here.

Perhaps you could adopt Loogy. He's got potential to be your sort of moron.

The ultimate asshole. That would be you, and It's not an act.

Up until now I have had a pristine gulf to boat in unlike the cesspool
you boat in. And a job would interfere with the many pleasures in life I
enjoy. Sorry you need to work at your advanced age. But Karen's got
another twenty to work and you can't stop till she does. Do you think
you can make it? It must really suck awfully bad to be you. Snerk

Why don't you have a nice Kosher gherkin salad for supper. Your bride
could warm them up for you.

PS It's in the national interest to get that spill cleaned up post
haste. I hope your boy has a plan. It's getting pretty messy out there
and time's a wasting.

hk wrote:

You're dealing with Boatless Flajim there, whose wife left him for a
cucumber.

It'd be interesting to hear why your first wife left you. My money is on
emotional abuse.

Johnson

In article ,
says...

hk wrote:

You're dealing with Boatless Flajim there, whose wife left him for a
cucumber.

It'd be interesting to hear why your first wife left you. My money is on
emotional abuse.

I'd bet there is some physical abuse that goes along with the emotional
abuse.

On 5/5/10 7:31 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleAZWdnczMNIfaP3zWnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

hk wrote:

You're dealing with Boatless Flajim there, whose wife left him for a
cucumber.

It'd be interesting to hear why your first wife left you. My money is on
emotional abuse.

I'd bet there is some physical abuse that goes along with the emotional
abuse.


You would, would you? You would be wrong on both counts. As a guy who
barely completed high school and couldn't get into college, and joined
the marines as a consolation prize, and never even got an overseas
posting, you sure have lot of ill-informed opinions. No wonder you're a
conserva-thug.


--
The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name.

In article ,
says...

On 5/5/10 7:31 PM, BAR wrote:
In articleAZWdnczMNIfaP3zWnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

hk wrote:

You're dealing with Boatless Flajim there, whose wife left him for a
cucumber.

It'd be interesting to hear why your first wife left you. My money is on
emotional abuse.

I'd bet there is some physical abuse that goes along with the emotional
abuse.


You would, would you? You would be wrong on both counts. As a guy who
barely completed high school and couldn't get into college, and joined
the marines as a consolation prize, and never even got an overseas
posting, you sure have lot of ill-informed opinions. No wonder you're a
conserva-thug.

You are just jealous because I own my home. I have a six figure income
and I've done more in my life then you will ever hope to do in your
life.