Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/27/10 1:50 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message m... On 4/27/10 1:01 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... I read an editorial somewhere concerning the small oil spill from the oil rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico saying that windmills do not explode or foul the environment but in reality windmills do kill wildlife. In fact the average windmill kills hundreds of birds and you can see vids of this on Youtube. One can also see vids of a windmill “exploding” as it gets of balance as well. In fact, the average windfarm probably kills more birds than this small oil spill will. You're crazy. It's spilling 40,000 barrels per DAY. If they can't cap it, it'll spill that much for months until another hole can be drilled. It's projected to pollute the coast of four states. Are oil barrels 55 gallons? If so, multiply 40,000 x 55...sheesh. To righties like Froggy, spilled oil is not a problem, and neither is the death of coal miners. Nope, 42 gallons. Thanks. Obviously, then, to Froggy, it is a far smaller problem. :) -- The Tea Party's teabaggers are just the Republican base by another name. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:01:07 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... I read an editorial somewhere concerning the small oil spill from the oil rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico saying that windmills do not explode or foul the environment but in reality windmills do kill wildlife. In fact the average windmill kills hundreds of birds and you can see vids of this on Youtube. One can also see vids of a windmill “exploding” as it gets of balance as well. In fact, the average windfarm probably kills more birds than this small oil spill will. You're crazy. It's spilling 40,000 barrels per DAY. If they can't cap it, it'll spill that much for months until another hole can be drilled. It's projected to pollute the coast of four states. Well, in today's news the report is that the CG is planning to set the oil on fire. I guess now we'll have to worry about the little fishes. Eddie |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Eddie" wrote in message
... On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:01:07 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Frogwatch" wrote in message ... I read an editorial somewhere concerning the small oil spill from the oil rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico saying that windmills do not explode or foul the environment but in reality windmills do kill wildlife. In fact the average windmill kills hundreds of birds and you can see vids of this on Youtube. One can also see vids of a windmill "exploding" as it gets of balance as well. In fact, the average windfarm probably kills more birds than this small oil spill will. You're crazy. It's spilling 40,000 barrels per DAY. If they can't cap it, it'll spill that much for months until another hole can be drilled. It's projected to pollute the coast of four states. Well, in today's news the report is that the CG is planning to set the oil on fire. I guess now we'll have to worry about the little fishes. Eddie I heard that also... a controlled burn. Oh, it was 40,000 gallons per day, but still... 2000 sq. miles or something like that. That's a lot of burning. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 27, 9:36*pm, "A.Boater" wrote:
More like whirling piles of bull****. Maybe you should post citations rather than try to accurately remember something you thought you might have read somewhere. The truth is: "Danger to birds is often the main complaint against the installation of a wind turbine. However, the Audubon Society finds that, for each unit of electricity generated, wind power kills around 1/15th the number of birds killed by fossil fuels.[7] *The number of birds killed by wind turbines is also negligible when compared to the number that die as a result of other human activities such as traffic, hunting, electric power transmission and high-rise buildings, the introduction of feral and roaming domestic cats,[8] *and especially the environmental impacts of using non-clean power sources." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environ...nd_power#Birds Besides being dangerous to wildlife and the food chain, that massive oil spill in the Gulf will cost small businesses such as fishermen, restaurants, motels, etc. a BUNDLE. Even large corporations will probably take a big ass kicking from this environmental disaster's toll on tourism. The spill is already costing BIG money. And the Coast Guard hasn't even given there numbers yet. It's costing BP $6 million a day, the relief well will top $100 million, and Transocean's stock is tanking. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Apr 27, 9:36 pm, "A.Boater" wrote: More like whirling piles of bull****. Maybe you should post citations rather than try to accurately remember something you thought you might have read somewhere. The truth is: "Danger to birds is often the main complaint against the installation of a wind turbine. However, the Audubon Society finds that, for each unit of electricity generated, wind power kills around 1/15th the number of birds killed by fossil fuels.[7] The number of birds killed by wind turbines is also negligible when compared to the number that die as a result of other human activities such as traffic, hunting, electric power transmission and high-rise buildings, the introduction of feral and roaming domestic cats,[8] and especially the environmental impacts of using non-clean power sources." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environ...nd_power#Birds Besides being dangerous to wildlife and the food chain, that massive oil spill in the Gulf will cost small businesses such as fishermen, restaurants, motels, etc. a BUNDLE. Even large corporations will probably take a big ass kicking from this environmental disaster's toll on tourism. The spill is already costing BIG money. And the Coast Guard hasn't even given there numbers yet. It's costing BP $6 million a day, the relief well will top $100 million, and Transocean's stock is tanking. Tanking? When's the last time you got a quote? |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 28, 1:22*pm, "D.Duck" wrote:
"Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Apr 27, 9:36 pm, "A.Boater" wrote: More like whirling piles of bull****. Maybe you should post citations rather than try to accurately remember something you thought you might have read somewhere. The truth is: "Danger to birds is often the main complaint against the installation of a wind turbine. However, the Audubon Society finds that, for each unit of electricity generated, wind power kills around 1/15th the number of birds killed by fossil fuels.[7] *The number of birds killed by wind turbines is also negligible when compared to the number that die as a result of other human activities such as traffic, hunting, electric power transmission and high-rise buildings, the introduction of feral and roaming domestic cats,[8] *and especially the environmental impacts of using non-clean power sources." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environ...nd_power#Birds Besides being dangerous to wildlife and the food chain, that massive oil spill in the Gulf will cost small businesses such as fishermen, restaurants, motels, etc. a BUNDLE. Even large corporations will probably take a big ass kicking from this environmental disaster's toll on tourism. The spill is already costing BIG money. And the Coast Guard hasn't even given there numbers yet. It's costing BP $6 million a day, the relief well will top $100 million, and Transocean's stock is tanking. Tanking? *When's the last time you got a quote?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Guess you didn't see the 5 day graph, huh? http://www.marke****ch.com/investing/stock/RIG |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Apr 28, 1:22 pm, "D.Duck" wrote: "Loogypicker" wrote in message ... On Apr 27, 9:36 pm, "A.Boater" wrote: More like whirling piles of bull****. Maybe you should post citations rather than try to accurately remember something you thought you might have read somewhere. The truth is: "Danger to birds is often the main complaint against the installation of a wind turbine. However, the Audubon Society finds that, for each unit of electricity generated, wind power kills around 1/15th the number of birds killed by fossil fuels.[7] The number of birds killed by wind turbines is also negligible when compared to the number that die as a result of other human activities such as traffic, hunting, electric power transmission and high-rise buildings, the introduction of feral and roaming domestic cats,[8] and especially the environmental impacts of using non-clean power sources." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environ...nd_power#Birds Besides being dangerous to wildlife and the food chain, that massive oil spill in the Gulf will cost small businesses such as fishermen, restaurants, motels, etc. a BUNDLE. Even large corporations will probably take a big ass kicking from this environmental disaster's toll on tourism. The spill is already costing BIG money. And the Coast Guard hasn't even given there numbers yet. It's costing BP $6 million a day, the relief well will top $100 million, and Transocean's stock is tanking. Tanking? When's the last time you got a quote?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Guess you didn't see the 5 day graph, huh? http://www.marke****ch.com/investing/stock/RIG You call 2~3% "tanking"? Not much of an investor, eh? Drillers and equipment is a good place to be today. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|