On 24/04/2010 11:12 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:04:23 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/04/2010 12:35 AM, jps wrote:

This is an excellent monologue by Bill Maher on American debt...

http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/pla...G6MZ081W3BC750

That was good! To the point, I like the satirial humor he has. In
Canada he would be called a baby killing anti-christ for suggesting
smaller government. But it is a coming. Wish our government controlled
media up here would put on his show.

it's funny. he doesn't even know that the canadian govt has proposed a
20% cut in expenditures. something that americans would never go for
because it reeks of 'centralized govt' making decisions.

Funny... making stuff up are we? What kind of meds did you say you take?

While technically I think the situation can be reversed, factoring in
politics and the lack of reality of the masses of voters, might as well
plan for the worst and hope the leftist big spenders come to grips with
reality. USA is broke.

notice he says zip about the biggest spenders in US history:

conservatives

Dream on. Obama is headed to hold the two top debtor spots in Amrican
history, 2009 and 2010. Even congress needs to double taxes or Obama
might hold the 4 top years of debt-spend.


--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:00:34 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/04/2010 11:12 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:04:23 -0600,
wrote:

On 24/04/2010 12:35 AM, jps wrote:

This is an excellent monologue by Bill Maher on American debt...

http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/pla...G6MZ081W3BC750

That was good! To the point, I like the satirial humor he has. In
Canada he would be called a baby killing anti-christ for suggesting
smaller government. But it is a coming. Wish our government controlled
media up here would put on his show.

it's funny. he doesn't even know that the canadian govt has proposed a
20% cut in expenditures. something that americans would never go for
because it reeks of 'centralized govt' making decisions.

Funny... making stuff up are we? What kind of meds did you say you take?

really? here's a reference from teh ultra right wing economist
veronique de rugy...the canadian govt cut spending by 20% between 1992
and 1997

http://corner.nationalreview.com/pos...llOGZjN2ViNjQ=


While technically I think the situation can be reversed, factoring in
politics and the lack of reality of the masses of voters, might as well
plan for the worst and hope the leftist big spenders come to grips with
reality. USA is broke.

notice he says zip about the biggest spenders in US history:

conservatives

Dream on. Obama is headed to hold the two top debtor spots in Amrican
history, 2009 and 2010. Even congress needs to double taxes or Obama
might hold the 4 top years of debt-spend.

notice he says nothing about the FACTS:

-unemployment is down
-housing market has stablized
-economy is growing

and our debt position was worse after ww2 than it is now.

AND he admits that HIS view would lead to MASSIVE unemployment...but
he doesnt care...after all, the rich would be protected


but he's an economic cripple

On 24/04/2010 3:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:

it's funny. he doesn't even know that the canadian govt has proposed a
20% cut in expenditures. something that americans would never go for
because it reeks of 'centralized govt' making decisions.

Funny... making stuff up are we? What kind of meds did you say you take?

really? here's a reference from teh ultra right wing economist
veronique de rugy...the canadian govt cut spending by 20% between 1992
and 1997

http://corner.nationalreview.com/pos...llOGZjN2ViNjQ=

National Review? That should tell you it is BS. Jean Chrétien was part
of ad-scam, theft of government moneys. So crooked many said he lied
out of both sides of his mouth in two languages at the same time. Paul
Martian can after, just wanted to make sure his Canada Steam Ships tax
loophole was kept open.

Government didn't cut spending, it raised taxes, GST was introduced in
1991 at 7%, a national VAT like tax. Yep, buy a $20K auto and write the
government a $1400 cheque over and above other taxes, local sales taxes
extra. Liberals promised to cancel it to get elected but decided they
loved the spending.

What the federal government did was jack the taxes and then make health
care a provincial responsibility, keeping the federal cash cow taxes
high. And the provinces jacked the taxes to compensate.

Result, working Canadians got tax screwed in both ears at once.

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:25:11 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 24/04/2010 3:00 PM, bpuharic wrote:

it's funny. he doesn't even know that the canadian govt has proposed a
20% cut in expenditures. something that americans would never go for
because it reeks of 'centralized govt' making decisions.

Funny... making stuff up are we? What kind of meds did you say you take?

really? here's a reference from teh ultra right wing economist
veronique de rugy...the canadian govt cut spending by 20% between 1992
and 1997

http://corner.nationalreview.com/pos...llOGZjN2ViNjQ=

National Review? That should tell you it is BS.

ROFLMAO!! they hate obama almost as much as you do. they love the rich
almost as much as you do.


Government didn't cut spending, it raised taxes,

hey, dont argue with me. your friends on hte right have your number,
sport. there are few economists as far right as de rugy.