"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 4/25/10 5:11 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:12:51 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



Nom=de=Plume


We were overspending voraciously before Obama got in. And he has
kicked up
the spending 2-3x.

for good economic reasons as opposed to bush who just killed 4400
US
troops and spent money on tax cuts for the rich

how did the rich use their money? did they give wage increases to
the
middle class?

nope the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 10 y ears.

did they create jobs? nope. no jobs created in 10 years.

what did they do? well...in the last 10 years, the richest 1% have
seen their incomes triple.

They are forecasting trillion dollar deficits for the
next 10 years/ How is this all Bush II's fault?

yeah it is. we have to spend what's needed to get out of the free
market hole we've dug ourselves into.


How about cutting spending
to GM.

peanuts


Point out the good reasons why Obama spending excess amounts of
money
is good. Not some talking point that Bush killed a bunch of
people,
spent a Trillion dollars. Explain it, or go get an education.
Explain
how we are getting more jobs, when California and others reached
record
unemployment this last quarter. Show how many foreclosed houses
are in
inventory, and which areas are selling, and how much discount from
the
last sale. Stop parroting Olberman, etc. He is probably more
biased
and not as smart as Rush.



This has been explained many times, and for the record, the
"amounts"
aren't "excessive." They're what's needed to get the economy moving
again. Feel free to believe otherwise. Already explained the
unemployment situation several times. Re-read the posts.

Rush is an idiot. You're an idiot. Canuck is an idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If your are going to answer for BP, at least do it coherently. Not
some
Olberman talking points or why we do not have the economy moving with
all
the debt spending. If you were ever a lawyer, you were fired for
laziness.



You're an idiot. I'm talking to you.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If I am an idiot, I appear brillian compared to you.




You are only brilliant in comparison to loogy and justhateaturd. In
comparison to someone of ordinary, average intelligence, you are as dumb
as a shoe.



You are so biased, your opinions do not count.

Bias has nothing to do with whether or not an opinion counts. An opinion
is just an opinion. There's no scorecard.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Actually biased opinions do rate lower than reasoned opinions.

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 4/25/10 5:11 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:12:51 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



Nom=de=Plume


We were overspending voraciously before Obama got in. And he
has
kicked up
the spending 2-3x.

for good economic reasons as opposed to bush who just killed 4400
US
troops and spent money on tax cuts for the rich

how did the rich use their money? did they give wage increases to
the
middle class?

nope the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 10 y ears.

did they create jobs? nope. no jobs created in 10 years.

what did they do? well...in the last 10 years, the richest 1%
have
seen their incomes triple.

They are forecasting trillion dollar deficits for the
next 10 years/ How is this all Bush II's fault?

yeah it is. we have to spend what's needed to get out of the free
market hole we've dug ourselves into.


How about cutting spending
to GM.

peanuts


Point out the good reasons why Obama spending excess amounts of
money
is good. Not some talking point that Bush killed a bunch of
people,
spent a Trillion dollars. Explain it, or go get an education.
Explain
how we are getting more jobs, when California and others reached
record
unemployment this last quarter. Show how many foreclosed houses
are in
inventory, and which areas are selling, and how much discount from
the
last sale. Stop parroting Olberman, etc. He is probably more
biased
and not as smart as Rush.



This has been explained many times, and for the record, the
"amounts"
aren't "excessive." They're what's needed to get the economy moving
again. Feel free to believe otherwise. Already explained the
unemployment situation several times. Re-read the posts.

Rush is an idiot. You're an idiot. Canuck is an idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If your are going to answer for BP, at least do it coherently. Not
some
Olberman talking points or why we do not have the economy moving
with all
the debt spending. If you were ever a lawyer, you were fired for
laziness.



You're an idiot. I'm talking to you.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If I am an idiot, I appear brillian compared to you.




You are only brilliant in comparison to loogy and justhateaturd. In
comparison to someone of ordinary, average intelligence, you are as
dumb as a shoe.



You are so biased, your opinions do not count.

Bias has nothing to do with whether or not an opinion counts. An opinion
is just an opinion. There's no scorecard.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Actually biased opinions do rate lower than reasoned opinions.

Please describe an unbiased opinion. It's pretty difficult. Most opinions
have some bias.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:14:55 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
om...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

guess being right wing prevents you from reading.

unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's now,
due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10%

whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools?



Show us a link where unemployment was 10% when Bush left office. With
real
government numbers.

show me a link that says bush had nothing to do with the current
economic crisis.



Sure Bush had a hand in the current crises. So did Bush's daddy and
Clinton. Clinton may have had the most impact. But Obama has not
helped the situation.



According to you. Not according to just about every reputable economist.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Bhaaaa haaaa haaaa. You better do some research.



Sounds like you've been practicing your sheep talk.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:14:55 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
news:mcd9t59anv52a8anvublp5nkk8aj5h0hne@4ax. com...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

guess being right wing prevents you from reading.

unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's
now,
due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10%

whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools?



Show us a link where unemployment was 10% when Bush left office. With
real
government numbers.

show me a link that says bush had nothing to do with the current
economic crisis.



Sure Bush had a hand in the current crises. So did Bush's daddy and
Clinton. Clinton may have had the most impact. But Obama has not
helped the situation.



According to you. Not according to just about every reputable economist.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Bhaaaa haaaa haaaa. You better do some research.



Sounds like you've been practicing your sheep talk.

--
Nom=de=Plume


You are a sheep. From your postings. Sheared most likely.

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 4/25/10 5:11 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:12:51 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



Nom=de=Plume


We were overspending voraciously before Obama got in. And he
has
kicked up
the spending 2-3x.

for good economic reasons as opposed to bush who just killed
4400 US
troops and spent money on tax cuts for the rich

how did the rich use their money? did they give wage increases
to the
middle class?

nope the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 10 y ears.

did they create jobs? nope. no jobs created in 10 years.

what did they do? well...in the last 10 years, the richest 1%
have
seen their incomes triple.

They are forecasting trillion dollar deficits for the
next 10 years/ How is this all Bush II's fault?

yeah it is. we have to spend what's needed to get out of the
free
market hole we've dug ourselves into.


How about cutting spending
to GM.

peanuts


Point out the good reasons why Obama spending excess amounts of
money
is good. Not some talking point that Bush killed a bunch of
people,
spent a Trillion dollars. Explain it, or go get an education.
Explain
how we are getting more jobs, when California and others reached
record
unemployment this last quarter. Show how many foreclosed houses
are in
inventory, and which areas are selling, and how much discount
from the
last sale. Stop parroting Olberman, etc. He is probably more
biased
and not as smart as Rush.



This has been explained many times, and for the record, the
"amounts"
aren't "excessive." They're what's needed to get the economy
moving
again. Feel free to believe otherwise. Already explained the
unemployment situation several times. Re-read the posts.

Rush is an idiot. You're an idiot. Canuck is an idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If your are going to answer for BP, at least do it coherently. Not
some
Olberman talking points or why we do not have the economy moving
with all
the debt spending. If you were ever a lawyer, you were fired for
laziness.



You're an idiot. I'm talking to you.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If I am an idiot, I appear brillian compared to you.




You are only brilliant in comparison to loogy and justhateaturd. In
comparison to someone of ordinary, average intelligence, you are as
dumb as a shoe.



You are so biased, your opinions do not count.

Bias has nothing to do with whether or not an opinion counts. An opinion
is just an opinion. There's no scorecard.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Actually biased opinions do rate lower than reasoned opinions.

Please describe an unbiased opinion. It's pretty difficult. Most opinions
have some bias.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Trolling again I see.

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 4/25/10 5:11 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:12:51 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



Nom=de=Plume


We were overspending voraciously before Obama got in. And he
has
kicked up
the spending 2-3x.

for good economic reasons as opposed to bush who just killed
4400 US
troops and spent money on tax cuts for the rich

how did the rich use their money? did they give wage increases
to the
middle class?

nope the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 10 y ears.

did they create jobs? nope. no jobs created in 10 years.

what did they do? well...in the last 10 years, the richest 1%
have
seen their incomes triple.

They are forecasting trillion dollar deficits for the
next 10 years/ How is this all Bush II's fault?

yeah it is. we have to spend what's needed to get out of the
free
market hole we've dug ourselves into.


How about cutting spending
to GM.

peanuts


Point out the good reasons why Obama spending excess amounts of
money
is good. Not some talking point that Bush killed a bunch of
people,
spent a Trillion dollars. Explain it, or go get an education.
Explain
how we are getting more jobs, when California and others reached
record
unemployment this last quarter. Show how many foreclosed houses
are in
inventory, and which areas are selling, and how much discount
from the
last sale. Stop parroting Olberman, etc. He is probably more
biased
and not as smart as Rush.



This has been explained many times, and for the record, the
"amounts"
aren't "excessive." They're what's needed to get the economy
moving
again. Feel free to believe otherwise. Already explained the
unemployment situation several times. Re-read the posts.

Rush is an idiot. You're an idiot. Canuck is an idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If your are going to answer for BP, at least do it coherently.
Not some
Olberman talking points or why we do not have the economy moving
with all
the debt spending. If you were ever a lawyer, you were fired for
laziness.



You're an idiot. I'm talking to you.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If I am an idiot, I appear brillian compared to you.




You are only brilliant in comparison to loogy and justhateaturd. In
comparison to someone of ordinary, average intelligence, you are as
dumb as a shoe.



You are so biased, your opinions do not count.

Bias has nothing to do with whether or not an opinion counts. An
opinion is just an opinion. There's no scorecard.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Actually biased opinions do rate lower than reasoned opinions.

Please describe an unbiased opinion. It's pretty difficult. Most opinions
have some bias.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Trolling again I see.



Refusing to answer a simple question I see.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:14:55 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
news:mcd9t59anv52a8anvublp5nkk8aj5h0hne@4ax .com...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

guess being right wing prevents you from reading.

unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's
now,
due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10%

whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools?



Show us a link where unemployment was 10% when Bush left office.
With real
government numbers.

show me a link that says bush had nothing to do with the current
economic crisis.



Sure Bush had a hand in the current crises. So did Bush's daddy and
Clinton. Clinton may have had the most impact. But Obama has not
helped the situation.



According to you. Not according to just about every reputable
economist.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Bhaaaa haaaa haaaa. You better do some research.



Sounds like you've been practicing your sheep talk.

--
Nom=de=Plume


You are a sheep. From your postings. Sheared most likely.



Yeah, that's why your a failed inventor, who's mightily ****ed off at the
world.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:29:39 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Bill McKee" wrote in message



Trolling again I see.



Refusing to answer a simple question I see.

the right generally calls the truth 'trolling'

On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:25:59 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:42:05 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



sure obama's helped. unemployment is down. corporate profits are up.
GDP is increasing

if that's failure, i'll take it any time.

and hand waving bush's role away while foaming at the mouth at obama
is delusional



Unemployment is not down. Maybe 1% to 10%, but is lot higher than when he
took over the office.

which is like blaming the surgeon for stopping blood loss. so you
admit it's down from the bush caused depression

thanks. i already knew that

About the only corporate gains are in guns and
financials. GDP is increasing how? How much is deficit spending by the
government?

corporate gains? intel record profits. guess you forgot about that...

deficit spending? better than we were after ww2.

you right wingers....you don't know history

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:29:39 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Bill McKee" wrote in message



Trolling again I see.



Refusing to answer a simple question I see.

the right generally calls the truth 'trolling'


OIC

--
Nom=de=Plume