"Bill McKee" wrote in message
news

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:12:51 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



Nom=de=Plume


We were overspending voraciously before Obama got in. And he has
kicked up
the spending 2-3x.

for good economic reasons as opposed to bush who just killed 4400 US
troops and spent money on tax cuts for the rich

how did the rich use their money? did they give wage increases to the
middle class?

nope the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 10 y ears.

did they create jobs? nope. no jobs created in 10 years.

what did they do? well...in the last 10 years, the richest 1% have
seen their incomes triple.

They are forecasting trillion dollar deficits for the
next 10 years/ How is this all Bush II's fault?

yeah it is. we have to spend what's needed to get out of the free
market hole we've dug ourselves into.


How about cutting spending
to GM.

peanuts


Point out the good reasons why Obama spending excess amounts of money
is good. Not some talking point that Bush killed a bunch of people,
spent a Trillion dollars. Explain it, or go get an education.
Explain how we are getting more jobs, when California and others
reached record unemployment this last quarter. Show how many
foreclosed houses are in inventory, and which areas are selling, and
how much discount from the last sale. Stop parroting Olberman, etc.
He is probably more biased and not as smart as Rush.



This has been explained many times, and for the record, the "amounts"
aren't "excessive." They're what's needed to get the economy moving
again. Feel free to believe otherwise. Already explained the
unemployment situation several times. Re-read the posts.

Rush is an idiot. You're an idiot. Canuck is an idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If your are going to answer for BP, at least do it coherently. Not some
Olberman talking points or why we do not have the economy moving with
all the debt spending. If you were ever a lawyer, you were fired for
laziness.



You're an idiot. I'm talking to you.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If I am an idiot, I appear brillian compared to you.



Brillian? You are Brazilian? Yes, you're an idiot. It's spelled I D I O T.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 4/25/10 5:11 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:12:51 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



Nom=de=Plume


We were overspending voraciously before Obama got in. And he has
kicked up
the spending 2-3x.

for good economic reasons as opposed to bush who just killed 4400
US
troops and spent money on tax cuts for the rich

how did the rich use their money? did they give wage increases to
the
middle class?

nope the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 10 y ears.

did they create jobs? nope. no jobs created in 10 years.

what did they do? well...in the last 10 years, the richest 1% have
seen their incomes triple.

They are forecasting trillion dollar deficits for the
next 10 years/ How is this all Bush II's fault?

yeah it is. we have to spend what's needed to get out of the free
market hole we've dug ourselves into.


How about cutting spending
to GM.

peanuts


Point out the good reasons why Obama spending excess amounts of
money
is good. Not some talking point that Bush killed a bunch of people,
spent a Trillion dollars. Explain it, or go get an education.
Explain
how we are getting more jobs, when California and others reached
record
unemployment this last quarter. Show how many foreclosed houses are
in
inventory, and which areas are selling, and how much discount from
the
last sale. Stop parroting Olberman, etc. He is probably more
biased
and not as smart as Rush.



This has been explained many times, and for the record, the "amounts"
aren't "excessive." They're what's needed to get the economy moving
again. Feel free to believe otherwise. Already explained the
unemployment situation several times. Re-read the posts.

Rush is an idiot. You're an idiot. Canuck is an idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If your are going to answer for BP, at least do it coherently. Not
some
Olberman talking points or why we do not have the economy moving with
all
the debt spending. If you were ever a lawyer, you were fired for
laziness.



You're an idiot. I'm talking to you.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If I am an idiot, I appear brillian compared to you.




You are only brilliant in comparison to loogy and justhateaturd. In
comparison to someone of ordinary, average intelligence, you are as dumb
as a shoe.



You are so biased, your opinions do not count.

Bias has nothing to do with whether or not an opinion counts. An opinion is
just an opinion. There's no scorecard.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 25/04/2010 11:42 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:12:51 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



Nom=de=Plume


We were overspending voraciously before Obama got in. And he has
kicked up
the spending 2-3x.

for good economic reasons as opposed to bush who just killed 4400 US
troops and spent money on tax cuts for the rich

how did the rich use their money? did they give wage increases to the
middle class?

nope the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 10 y ears.

did they create jobs? nope. no jobs created in 10 years.

what did they do? well...in the last 10 years, the richest 1% have
seen their incomes triple.

They are forecasting trillion dollar deficits for the
next 10 years/ How is this all Bush II's fault?

yeah it is. we have to spend what's needed to get out of the free
market hole we've dug ourselves into.


How about cutting spending
to GM.

peanuts


Point out the good reasons why Obama spending excess amounts of money
is
good. Not some talking point that Bush killed a bunch of people,
spent
a Trillion dollars. Explain it, or go get an education. Explain how
we
are getting more jobs, when California and others reached record
unemployment this last quarter. Show how many foreclosed houses are
in
inventory, and which areas are selling, and how much discount from the
last sale. Stop parroting Olberman, etc. He is probably more biased
and not as smart as Rush.



This has been explained many times, and for the record, the "amounts"
aren't "excessive." They're what's needed to get the economy moving
again. Feel free to believe otherwise. Already explained the
unemployment
situation several times. Re-read the posts.

Rush is an idiot. You're an idiot. Canuck is an idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If your are going to answer for BP, at least do it coherently. Not some
Olberman talking points or why we do not have the economy moving with
all
the debt spending. If you were ever a lawyer, you were fired for
laziness.



You're an idiot. I'm talking to you.

So? What was the reason your were fired?

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.


Fired? Like you? No. I work for a living.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 25/04/2010 11:42 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:12:51 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



Nom=de=Plume


We were overspending voraciously before Obama got in. And he has
kicked up
the spending 2-3x.

for good economic reasons as opposed to bush who just killed 4400 US
troops and spent money on tax cuts for the rich

how did the rich use their money? did they give wage increases to the
middle class?

nope the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 10 y ears.

did they create jobs? nope. no jobs created in 10 years.

what did they do? well...in the last 10 years, the richest 1% have
seen their incomes triple.

They are forecasting trillion dollar deficits for the
next 10 years/ How is this all Bush II's fault?

yeah it is. we have to spend what's needed to get out of the free
market hole we've dug ourselves into.


How about cutting spending
to GM.

peanuts


Point out the good reasons why Obama spending excess amounts of money
is
good. Not some talking point that Bush killed a bunch of people,
spent
a Trillion dollars. Explain it, or go get an education. Explain how
we
are getting more jobs, when California and others reached record
unemployment this last quarter. Show how many foreclosed houses are
in
inventory, and which areas are selling, and how much discount from the
last sale. Stop parroting Olberman, etc. He is probably more biased
and not as smart as Rush.



This has been explained many times, and for the record, the "amounts"
aren't "excessive." They're what's needed to get the economy moving
again. Feel free to believe otherwise. Already explained the
unemployment
situation several times. Re-read the posts.

Rush is an idiot. You're an idiot. Canuck is an idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If your are going to answer for BP, at least do it coherently. Not some
Olberman talking points or why we do not have the economy moving with
all
the debt spending. If you were ever a lawyer, you were fired for
laziness.



You're an idiot. I'm talking to you.

We won't talk to you if you don't talk to us.


Yes! I agree. That's what Bush and Cheney did. How did that no talky no
thinky work out for you.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:14:55 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

guess being right wing prevents you from reading.

unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's now,
due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10%

whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools?



Show us a link where unemployment was 10% when Bush left office. With
real
government numbers.

show me a link that says bush had nothing to do with the current
economic crisis.



Sure Bush had a hand in the current crises. So did Bush's daddy and
Clinton. Clinton may have had the most impact. But Obama has not helped
the situation.

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:14:55 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

guess being right wing prevents you from reading.

unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's now,
due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10%

whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools?



Show us a link where unemployment was 10% when Bush left office. With
real
government numbers.

show me a link that says bush had nothing to do with the current
economic crisis.



Sure Bush had a hand in the current crises. So did Bush's daddy and
Clinton. Clinton may have had the most impact. But Obama has not helped
the situation.



According to you. Not according to just about every reputable economist.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:42:05 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .


Show us a link where unemployment was 10% when Bush left office. With
real
government numbers.

show me a link that says bush had nothing to do with the current
economic crisis.



Sure Bush had a hand in the current crises. So did Bush's daddy and
Clinton. Clinton may have had the most impact. But Obama has not helped
the situation.

sure obama's helped. unemployment is down. corporate profits are up.
GDP is increasing

if that's failure, i'll take it any time.

and hand waving bush's role away while foaming at the mouth at obama
is delusional

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:14:55 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

guess being right wing prevents you from reading.

unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's now,
due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10%

whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools?



Show us a link where unemployment was 10% when Bush left office. With
real
government numbers.

show me a link that says bush had nothing to do with the current
economic crisis.



Sure Bush had a hand in the current crises. So did Bush's daddy and
Clinton. Clinton may have had the most impact. But Obama has not helped
the situation.



According to you. Not according to just about every reputable economist.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Bhaaaa haaaa haaaa. You better do some research.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:42:05 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..


Show us a link where unemployment was 10% when Bush left office. With
real
government numbers.

show me a link that says bush had nothing to do with the current
economic crisis.



Sure Bush had a hand in the current crises. So did Bush's daddy and
Clinton. Clinton may have had the most impact. But Obama has not helped
the situation.

sure obama's helped. unemployment is down. corporate profits are up.
GDP is increasing

if that's failure, i'll take it any time.

and hand waving bush's role away while foaming at the mouth at obama
is delusional



Unemployment is not down. Maybe 1% to 10%, but is lot higher than when he
took over the office. About the only corporate gains are in guns and
financials. GDP is increasing how? How much is deficit spending by the
government?

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:18:37 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


you really are an economic cripple, aren't you?


Down 1% from the nearly 11% it rose to under Obama. He is responsible for
5
points of gain. Happened on his watch.

which is like blaming lincoln for the civil war.



Nope, you blame Bush for 9/11. Can not have it both ways.