On 25/04/2010 3:36 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:46:53 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

http://www.bls.gov/ the US bureau of labor statistics

unemployment reached its peak at 10.7%. it's now 9.7%. a 1% drop in
10% unemployment is TEN PERCENT

you are SUCH an IDIOT!!



Me an idiot? You are frigging immensely stupid. You said Obama had reduced
unemployment 10% since he came in to office. Let me show you your quote
"the FACT is unemployment has dropped by 10% since Obama took office.
"
It dropped 10% from the highest it was since he came in to office and it may
just be a small perturbation from the census worker hiring. He pushed for
the stimulus to keep unemployment under 8%. IT went from 10.7 to 9.7% last
month. He has gone up since he took over office. Gone up lots. In Feb.
2008 was 5.2%.

guess being right wing prevents you from reading.

unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's now,
due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10%

whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools?

What am I missing? 10% - 9.7% = 1%. Not 10%.

Trouble with you brain farts is you are mostly wrong, and never admit it.

..... hahahaha...

And lets take a look at a real chart:

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD

When Obama took office it was about 6.9% to 7.7%. Funny how it peeked
10 months after Bush left office.

Take your bull**** elsewhere.

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:29:10 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/04/2010 3:36 PM, bpuharic wrote:


unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's now,
due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10%

whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools?

What am I missing? 10% - 9.7% = 1%. Not 10%.

hey genius. whatsamatter? dont they teach math at right wing mental
institutions?

1/10 is 10%

hell. you cant even do simple math.


Trouble with you brain farts is you are mostly wrong, and never admit it.

.... hahahaha...

And lets take a look at a real chart:

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD

When Obama took office it was about 6.9% to 7.7%. Funny how it peeked
10 months after Bush left office.

yep. we have...or had...a 14 trillion dollar economy. it took a long
time for bush's disaster to be rescued by obama


Take your bull**** elsewhere.

On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote:

For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a
record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones
unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%.

so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i
already knew that

Nope:

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD

But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed
up with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management. Bush
did pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up
pretty big time.

And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of
unemployment benefits.

Just more bpuharic / Obama BS...

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote:

For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a
record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones
unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%.

so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i
already knew that

Nope:

guess you missed the BLS stats....unemployment is down 10% under
obama...

but, then, rush hasn't told you this yet. kind of like the n.korean
dear leader telling his subjects about what to believe


http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD

But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed
up with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management.

guess he doesnt know the fed, not congress, is responsible for setting
interest rates, and the money supply

oh well. he's right wing. not bright. not informed....but what he
lacks in quality he makes up for in quantity.

Bush
did pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up
pretty big time.

and the biggest spender in history was bush....even before the 2006
congress.

but he's rich. and white. so he's blameless


And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of
unemployment benefits.

except that the direction is the other way. people who've gone OFF the
job search are coming back into the market as unemployment drops

you really are an economic cripple, aren't you?

"hk" wrote in message
m...
On 4/25/10 5:11 PM, Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:12:51 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:



Nom=de=Plume


We were overspending voraciously before Obama got in. And he has
kicked up
the spending 2-3x.

for good economic reasons as opposed to bush who just killed 4400 US
troops and spent money on tax cuts for the rich

how did the rich use their money? did they give wage increases to
the
middle class?

nope the middle class hasnt had a pay increase in 10 y ears.

did they create jobs? nope. no jobs created in 10 years.

what did they do? well...in the last 10 years, the richest 1% have
seen their incomes triple.

They are forecasting trillion dollar deficits for the
next 10 years/ How is this all Bush II's fault?

yeah it is. we have to spend what's needed to get out of the free
market hole we've dug ourselves into.


How about cutting spending
to GM.

peanuts


Point out the good reasons why Obama spending excess amounts of money
is good. Not some talking point that Bush killed a bunch of people,
spent a Trillion dollars. Explain it, or go get an education.
Explain
how we are getting more jobs, when California and others reached
record
unemployment this last quarter. Show how many foreclosed houses are
in
inventory, and which areas are selling, and how much discount from
the
last sale. Stop parroting Olberman, etc. He is probably more biased
and not as smart as Rush.



This has been explained many times, and for the record, the "amounts"
aren't "excessive." They're what's needed to get the economy moving
again. Feel free to believe otherwise. Already explained the
unemployment situation several times. Re-read the posts.

Rush is an idiot. You're an idiot. Canuck is an idiot.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If your are going to answer for BP, at least do it coherently. Not
some
Olberman talking points or why we do not have the economy moving with
all
the debt spending. If you were ever a lawyer, you were fired for
laziness.



You're an idiot. I'm talking to you.

--
Nom=de=Plume


If I am an idiot, I appear brillian compared to you.




You are only brilliant in comparison to loogy and justhateaturd. In
comparison to someone of ordinary, average intelligence, you are as dumb
as a shoe.



You are so biased, your opinions do not count.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 22:46:53 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

http://www.bls.gov/ the US bureau of labor statistics

unemployment reached its peak at 10.7%. it's now 9.7%. a 1% drop in
10% unemployment is TEN PERCENT

you are SUCH an IDIOT!!



Me an idiot? You are frigging immensely stupid. You said Obama had
reduced
unemployment 10% since he came in to office. Let me show you your quote
"the FACT is unemployment has dropped by 10% since Obama took office.
"
It dropped 10% from the highest it was since he came in to office and it
may
just be a small perturbation from the census worker hiring. He pushed for
the stimulus to keep unemployment under 8%. IT went from 10.7 to 9.7%
last
month. He has gone up since he took over office. Gone up lots. In Feb.
2008 was 5.2%.

guess being right wing prevents you from reading.

unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's now,
due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10%

whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools?



Show us a link where unemployment was 10% when Bush left office. With real
government numbers.

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote:

For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a
record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones
unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%.

so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i
already knew that

Nope:

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD

But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed up
with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management. Bush did
pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up pretty
big time.

And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of unemployment
benefits.

Just more bpuharic / Obama BS...

--
Socialism and statism are great as long as someone else pays for it.

The dip is probably real. Those thousands hired temporarily for the CENSUS.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote:

For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a
record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones
unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%.

so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i
already knew that

Nope:

guess you missed the BLS stats....unemployment is down 10% under
obama...

but, then, rush hasn't told you this yet. kind of like the n.korean
dear leader telling his subjects about what to believe


http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD

But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed
up with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management.

guess he doesnt know the fed, not congress, is responsible for setting
interest rates, and the money supply

oh well. he's right wing. not bright. not informed....but what he
lacks in quality he makes up for in quantity.

Bush
did pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up
pretty big time.

and the biggest spender in history was bush....even before the 2006
congress.

but he's rich. and white. so he's blameless


And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of
unemployment benefits.

except that the direction is the other way. people who've gone OFF the
job search are coming back into the market as unemployment drops

you really are an economic cripple, aren't you?


Down 1% from the nearly 11% it rose to under Obama. He is responsible for 5
points of gain. Happened on his watch.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:14:55 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 14:17:49 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

guess being right wing prevents you from reading.

unemployment due to bush's policy, reached a high of 10.7%. it's now,
due to obama's policies, 9.7. that's about 10%

whatsamatter? don't they teach math in right wing remedial schools?



Show us a link where unemployment was 10% when Bush left office. With real
government numbers.

show me a link that says bush had nothing to do with the current
economic crisis.

On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:18:37 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


you really are an economic cripple, aren't you?


Down 1% from the nearly 11% it rose to under Obama. He is responsible for 5
points of gain. Happened on his watch.

which is like blaming lincoln for the civil war.