"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:39:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 25/04/2010 5:04 PM, bpuharic wrote:

For the 1%, take a look at the long term unemployed numbers now on a
record high since been record since 1963 or something, the ones
unemployed for more than 6 months not counted in the 9.7%.

so you admit unemployment is coming down under obama? thanks. i
already knew that

Nope:

guess you missed the BLS stats....unemployment is down 10% under
obama...

but, then, rush hasn't told you this yet. kind of like the n.korean
dear leader telling his subjects about what to believe


http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Econ...spx?Symbol=USD

But does make the case that the 2006 democrat congress royally screwed
up with it's cheap easy artificially low debt money management.

guess he doesnt know the fed, not congress, is responsible for setting
interest rates, and the money supply

oh well. he's right wing. not bright. not informed....but what he
lacks in quality he makes up for in quantity.

Bush
did pretty good until those democrat easy debt congress types messed up
pretty big time.

and the biggest spender in history was bush....even before the 2006
congress.

but he's rich. and white. so he's blameless


And the dip so far is nothing more than people rolling off of
unemployment benefits.

except that the direction is the other way. people who've gone OFF the
job search are coming back into the market as unemployment drops

you really are an economic cripple, aren't you?


Down 1% from the nearly 11% it rose to under Obama. He is responsible for 5
points of gain. Happened on his watch.