Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:24:56 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 25/04/2010 12:02 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:24:23 -0600, wrote: Just like any other monkey this planet. You should read Maslow ah. i see your problem. you're an authoritarian. you believe in sacred texts and can't think on your own. that's why you're a right whiner. Why make the same mistakes people made 100 years ago? I am not authoritarian but respect authority to a point. says the guy who thinks we should repeat the mistakes of 1929 ironic, isn't it? yes. i know about maslow. i minored in psychology, and went to nursing school Somehow I think you are bull****ing. If you really had a degree in basic psychology you would know people are motivated by their needs and their greeds. And greed isn't just about money, it could be recognition, self worth, entitlement, manipulation... now let's see...i said i MINORED in psychology...to him that means i got a degree in psych. gee. and he claims he can read. and he's been to college! the funny thing about maslow...from the viewpoint of a physical scientist...there's precious little DATA to back him up. his is a heuristic view of the world. good in its own doman, but pretty much useless for actually looking at how the world works None of these theries have proof and are "perfect". Just Maslow made a lot of sense to me and use it to this day as it seems to be one that works. i have no problem with accepting maslow as a guide. in nursing school we used it to priortize treatment of patients. but treating it as gospel to guide economic policy? i dont THINK so... you have no capability for independent thought, so NATURALLY think in terms of authority, stereotypes and cliches. I repeat, why make the same mistakes people made 100 years ago? says the guy who wants to repeat the mistakes of 1929? why? you think mistakes of 80 years ago are better than those made 100 years ago? -when it's pointed out unemployment has dropped under obama? you want to change HOW it's measured I question those with shakey numbers, fast taking abd bull****. gee. the measurement method has been the same for decades. yet you question it only for the darkie president. strange...almost as if you thought race should be a factor... -when it's pointed out the US is the LEAST redistributionist economy on earth? you say you don't care, that your theology requires it's the MOST balanced. So? Borrowing from a wise statement of the day, is this about same rewards for all or equal access to opportunity? you have a remarkable gullibility. you think that, if someone is rich, they know what they're doing and deserve to be rich any proof of that? nope. -when it's pointed out the economy is growing you say it cant be growing or you'd be wrong. Because I don't think one dimensionally. GDP can grow but does not mean people are employed or making more money or happier. gee. i use a multidimensional analysis...GDP growth...unemployment drop, etc you? you want to change the goalposts every single time a measurement disagrees with your right wing theology. . We all be needy and greedy, it defines us all. Just what is your need and focus of your greed. Motivates people well when you understand that. gee. greed. no patriotism. no honor. no pride in a hard day's work Again, you are thinking one dimensionally. If one has a need to be honorable, pride etc., as most do, then they will become that to satisfy the need. It fits. somehow i don't think a medal of honor winner's 'greed' is the same as a wall street banker's greed. i'm sure, to a right winger, they're the same, since a rich wall street banker is a hero... but some of us see it differently you despise the middle class Nope. you hate working people. Nope. They are the back bone of society. But governance is ****ing on them with debt and bailouts robbing their wealth. says the guy who routinely calls 100,000,000 middle class americans dupes for being raped by wall street. One thing I always admired about Americans is their pride in their country. Much to be proud off, never before have so many lived so well with the foundation of less but functional government and equal access to opportunity. Mutual repect and foundation of law. except, in your view, for the middle class who are just a bunch of sheep since they're not rich. Now it is decaying. you? you despise them all unless they're rich Not as a rule. Just the ones that envy and want to use governemnt to steal from successful people. ah. successful people. like wall street bankers who have done SO much for the middle class. your hero worship...your worship of wall street leaves alot of room between you and working folks. Governemnt taxation should not be used for GM, Citi, Chrysler, BAC and a long list of other corrupted entities. And people who support this rape of wealth, well, they have lost their values. and, it seems, you ignore the fact your view was tried. somehow evidence has no effect on your thinking typical right winger. really? then, perhaps, you can tell me why the US had a higher debt/GDP ratio after ww2 and built a world class economy. How much debt is functional and how much debt you can afford is not related at all to GDP. It is just a way to turd polish a bad situation. more doubletalk. the fact is that, for 30 years, we've had right wing free market fundamentalism drive up the secdtion of GDP based on the financial sector to 40%. and the right said NOTHING about it... except for people like you who worship the 'successful' rich How much you can borrow is related to how much you can pay. With a middle class in debt up to it's ass, unlike WW II, today does not have the payment elasticity of WW II. gee...let's see...in ww2, the rich at least gave the middle class a decent living TODAY the rich doesnt even give the middle class a pay raise. in 10 years, productivity has increased 28%. and the amount given to the middle class? zero. nothing. not a dime. yet wall street bitches that the middle class isn't spending and folks like you bitch at the middle class because you think we should starve our children to finance wall street rich bankers oh. you don't know bet you dont even know what percentage of the US budget goes for debt service, do you? http://www.usdebtclock.org/ But know that with interest rates being so artificially low, that $193 billion each year or so could easily become a trillion with fair market rates. As they are only paying a little under 1.4%. It really should be 5%. They have also created a lot of Federal Reserve inflationary funny money which means the interest rates will go up or the value of the USD will go down and the truth will be inbetween. the basis of the US economy is hte middle class...middle class spending... 30 years ago i remember wall street used to INCREASE when unemployment went UP because they thought it reduced corporate debt. today it goes DOWN because even wall street realizes we need at least SOMETHING of a middle class how long is it going to take the right wing to realize we need low unemployment and a decent raise every year? so far you guys believe that the middle class should be a permanent rape victim Good news is individual debt is going down as smart people are getting rid of debt anticipating higher interest rates. Just that the stumps like you are so biased and closed minded you never put credence to others, thought history would not repeat etc. says the guy who thinks greed is good... how'd that work out for wall street? US holdings, pretty dam good for 2009 and so far in 2010. Up about 53% in the last 4 years. And you? and the other 100,000,000 americans? oh. i forgot. you'd be happy if their children were in the streets |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Teabaggers Mount New Protest | General | |||
Gingrich Quote | General | |||
Texas teabaggers boo conservative Repubicans | General | |||
TeaBaggers Manipulated by Faux News | General | |||
Gingrich blasts our Iraq policy | General |