On Apr 12, 9:00*pm, hk wrote:
On 4/12/10 6:16 PM, Wayne.B wrote:





On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:46:29 -0400,
wrote:

I would agree that there are some unions that assist with, and
encourage, good quality. * The UAW has never impressed me that way.
Whether or not that is ultimately the fault of management is certainly
arguable.What is perfectly clear is that the UAW has an unblemished
* track record for opposing the modernization of work rules and other
* improvements in productivity.

You really do not know what you are talking about in your last
sentence, nor do you have any understanding of the severely adversarial
relationship that has existed between the UAW and the employers of its
members for many, many generations, going back to the 1930's and the
Ford Motor Company attacks on union members, organizers and
pamphleteers. The employers have never let up for a moment in their
attempts to bust the unions.

1930s ?

That's like red necks still fighting the civil war 150 years later.
It's time to move on into the 21st century.

GM and Ford could have busted the unions any time they were willing to
take the big strike and start sub-contracting out *major
sub-assemblies to non-union suppliers. *The short term profit motive
and politics always won out. *The UAW would target the weakest of the
three sisters and everyone else would fall into line.

U.S. automaker policy towards unions has not changed since the 1930's.
It's still relevant.

The union's policy against the very mouths that feed them has not
changed in as many years, Lunacy.


And the rednecks are still fighting the civil war 150 years later...you
need look no farther than the state of virginia and the teabaggers.

Yet it is still the same old scalawags and carpetbaggers that continue
to propagate the civil war. It's over. Get it?