"mmc" wrote in message
g.com...

"Steve" wrote in message
...

On 5-Apr-2010, hk wrote:

advertise for? "Help wanted: Incompetent lardasses that have no
original
thoughts and resent having to work at all to fill the positions of
making
the public that pays their obscene "wages" frustrated with your
incompetence."?

Sounds like you are describing corporate America's wall street money
managers and manufacturing execs...

I doubt either of you could qualify for any medium or higher lever job
with the federal government.

That is absolutely correct - I would not condone the useless bureaucracy.
If only 20% of the public quit condoning the incompetence and corruption,
there would be 10 to 15 million unemployed lackies. Their wages could be
put
into productive enterprise.

I couldn't qualify since I have the work ethic required to actually earn
my wages. This is neither required or tolerated in government jobs.
I think you could probably do well in gov't, Harry. Probably fit right in
and the transition from doing nothing to almost nothing shouldn't be too
painful.



Really? All gov't jobs? More total bs.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 05/04/2010 2:20 PM, Steve wrote:
On 5-Apr-2010, wrote:

DAMN! That means pretty soon we'll need even more illegal Mexicans!
(Legitimate Mexicans are building cars, TV's, electronics, home
appliances
etc. in Mexico, doing the jobs "Americans" just won't do.)

You can NEVER have enough low wage retail clerks, car wash attendants
and
government lackies.

The problem with the government lackies is that if you were to do a cost
to
value analysis (actual hours worked vs paid for) you end up in
$100s/hour.

Let's outsourse them all.

You CAN'T outsource them - what would a functional commercial enterprise
advertise for? "Help wanted: Incompetent lardasses that have no original
thoughts and resent having to work at all to fill the positions of making
the public that pays their obscene "wages" frustrated with your
incompetence."? Before you know it every loon from the post office and
DMV
and people that buy foreign cars would be beating thewir doors down.

Obama has the answer, we all work for the government pushing paper.

--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.


We? You don't live nor can you enter the US, apparently.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 5-Apr-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

I couldn't qualify since I have the work ethic required to actually earn

my wages. This is neither required or tolerated in government jobs.
I think you could probably do well in gov't, Harry. Probably fit right
in
and the transition from doing nothing to almost nothing shouldn't be too

painful.



Really? All gov't jobs? More total bs.

2/3 of federal, state and local governments could be eliminated with nothing
but positive repurcussions. The whine and beg class will never let that
happen.

On 4/6/10 7:27 AM, Steve wrote:
On 5-Apr-2010, wrote:

I couldn't qualify since I have the work ethic required to actually earn

my wages. This is neither required or tolerated in government jobs.
I think you could probably do well in gov't, Harry. Probably fit right
in
and the transition from doing nothing to almost nothing shouldn't be too

painful.



Really? All gov't jobs? More total bs.

2/3 of federal, state and local governments could be eliminated with nothing
but positive repurcussions.

Another drug-induced analyses?



--
http://tinyurl.com/ykxp2ym

"Steve" wrote in message
...

On 5-Apr-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

I couldn't qualify since I have the work ethic required to actually
earn

my wages. This is neither required or tolerated in government jobs.
I think you could probably do well in gov't, Harry. Probably fit right
in
and the transition from doing nothing to almost nothing shouldn't be
too

painful.



Really? All gov't jobs? More total bs.

2/3 of federal, state and local governments could be eliminated with
nothing
but positive repurcussions. The whine and beg class will never let that
happen.


According to you. Wow. You should run for something. How about the ice cream
truck.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 6-Apr-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

2/3 of federal, state and local governments could be eliminated with
nothing
but positive repurcussions. The whine and beg class will never let that
happen.


According to you. Wow. You should run for something. How about the ice
cream
truck.

Waste of time. The panderers have the upper hand. It is not possibe to
bring the United States back to a structure of production, solid, profitable
core industries, a majprity middle class, or civilized social standards. It
likely won't become 3rd world (maybe in 4 to 5 generations) but 2nd world is
solidly in place. No sense in getting upset about it. It's done, and
strangely, enthusiastically endorsed by the masses. 537 scumbags in D.C.
cannot change what 2/3 or a population of 300 million define.

"Steve" wrote in message
...

On 6-Apr-2010, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

2/3 of federal, state and local governments could be eliminated with
nothing
but positive repurcussions. The whine and beg class will never let
that
happen.


According to you. Wow. You should run for something. How about the ice
cream
truck.

Waste of time. The panderers have the upper hand. It is not possibe to
bring the United States back to a structure of production, solid,
profitable
core industries, a majprity middle class, or civilized social standards.
It
likely won't become 3rd world (maybe in 4 to 5 generations) but 2nd world
is
solidly in place. No sense in getting upset about it. It's done, and
strangely, enthusiastically endorsed by the masses. 537 scumbags in D.C.
cannot change what 2/3 or a population of 300 million define.


Well, I disagree. We won't return to the environment we had, say in the
1950s, but the world has changed. We're innovators. We adapt.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:54:06 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:


Well, I disagree. We won't return to the environment we had, say in the
1950s, but the world has changed. We're innovators. We adapt.

Funny, we are still the world's third largest exporter.

On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:16:35 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:54:06 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:


Well, I disagree. We won't return to the environment we had, say in the
1950s, but the world has changed. We're innovators. We adapt.

Funny, we are still the world's third largest exporter.

Unfortunately, one of our major exports has become talent.

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:54:06 -0700, nom=de=plume wrote:


Well, I disagree. We won't return to the environment we had, say in the
1950s, but the world has changed. We're innovators. We adapt.

Funny, we are still the world's third largest exporter.


I guess we're doomed then.

--
Nom=de=Plume