On 04/04/2010 5:48 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 02/04/2010 9:35 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articlec89895a8-7002-486a-887a-
,
says...

This guy took Cynthia McKinney's seat, and he's just as stupid as she
is!
Here he is in all his glory:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsFsn8ekyhw

I don't know how the General didn't fall off his seat. That's it folks,
"the best trained Armed Forces in the World"!

Scotty


Looks like the video was pulled. Liberal censorship?

Are you surprised. This thug Administration is nothing but a bunch of
union thugs and a puppet in the White House. How many corps and even
private citizens have been directly attacked by the Oval office, can you
say Joe the Plumber, or Rush Limbaugh?

Scotty

Not really, liberal-democrat fascism is intolerant for liberty and
freedom. In the end, big fat up your arse expensive government will rob
people of their fiscal liberty, wealth and freedom. There was a reason
why forefounders wanted to limit government. Wise men.

I think it is more incidious than union thugs, although they were
certainly instrumental pawns in selling out fellow Americans and
Canadians. If you look at Carlyle, Cerberus for example, they had a lot
to lose and everything to gain by a GM/Chrysler bailout. And the people
who invest in these are mega-billionaires, the whose who of the elite
super rich are their clients. Including Osama Bin Laden's brother!!

And I can't help but think which banks failed and which ones got
bailouts had a lot to do with the names of their top depositors. If you
had a billion cash on deposit with a failing bank, what is spending $2-3
million of greece on DC politicians? Because if the bank goes under,
your not insured.

I thought Bush was OK until he turned bailout taps on, while it was
pushed by senate and congress as well, that turn made me dispise Bush.
I thought for a bit Obama might stop the corruption, but instead he
turned the corruption debt taps wide open.

Our DC and Ottawa governemtns are dripping wet corrupt on these
bailouts. Pretty obvious sitting representatives for the most part
support this corruption.

Hopefully it will change in November.
--
Liberal-statism is an addiction to other peoples money.

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 08:42:01 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:



Not really, liberal-democrat fascism is intolerant for liberty and
freedom. In the end, big fat up your arse expensive government will rob
people of their fiscal liberty, wealth and freedom. There was a reason
why forefounders wanted to limit government. Wise men.

if our govt was as bad as you say it is, we wouldnt be the richest and
most powerful natiion in the world

that alone shows your position is full of ****


I think it is more incidious than union thugs, although they were
certainly instrumental pawns in selling out fellow Americans and
Canadians

i live in PA. do you know why the PA state police was formed?

as a union busting state organization funded by the govt.


.. If you look at Carlyle, Cerberus for example, they had a lot
to lose and everything to gain by a GM/Chrysler bailout. And the people
who invest in these are mega-billionaires, the whose who of the elite
super rich are their clients. Including Osama Bin Laden's brother!!

and who made sure the bin laden family got the hell out of dodge the
day after 9/11?

george bush


And I can't help but think which banks failed and which ones got
bailouts had a lot to do with the names of their top depositors. If you
had a billion cash on deposit with a failing bank, what is spending $2-3
million of greece on DC politicians? Because if the bank goes under,
your not insured.

the right bitches

the right moans

the right destroys

but the right has NO solutions to any problem at all. canuck posts
like he's writing the encyclopedia britannica.

but he never proposes a single solution that will work. his only
bull**** comes from limballs.


Our DC and Ottawa governemtns are dripping wet corrupt on these
bailouts. Pretty obvious sitting representatives for the most part
support this corruption.

Hopefully it will change in November.


funny that the banking system in canada, which was more socialized and
regulated than US banks, didnt suffer as much as US banks did