On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:45:26 -0400, Larry wrote:



That works so well for welfare. Breeding more deadbeats and getting
others to pay for it ****es me off. Now you want to add a whole new
level? Welfare checks *and* free health care?

how about welfare for wall street?

you right wingers.....i laugh when i read you because it's obvious
your abso-****in-lutely clueless

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:45:26 -0400, Larry wrote:



That works so well for welfare. Breeding more deadbeats and getting
others to pay for it ****es me off. Now you want to add a whole new
level? Welfare checks *and* free health care?

how about welfare for wall street?

you right wingers.....i laugh when i read you because it's obvious
your abso-****in-lutely clueless


I am against that also. Why does Obama give Wall Street all they want?

On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:50:52 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:45:26 -0400, Larry wrote:



That works so well for welfare. Breeding more deadbeats and getting
others to pay for it ****es me off. Now you want to add a whole new
level? Welfare checks *and* free health care?

how about welfare for wall street?

you right wingers.....i laugh when i read you because it's obvious
your abso-****in-lutely clueless


I am against that also. Why does Obama give Wall Street all they want?

because george bush and other rich, white frat boys, rigged the system
so we have no choice. it's either bail out the rich or let the banking
system go down in flames...like in 29.

that's why the banks are fighting so hard against regulation. and why
people like richard shelby, GOP of alabama...are carrying their water
for them. protect the rich

On 30/03/2010 4:14 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:50:52 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:45:26 -0400, wrote:



That works so well for welfare. Breeding more deadbeats and getting
others to pay for it ****es me off. Now you want to add a whole new
level? Welfare checks *and* free health care?

how about welfare for wall street?

you right wingers.....i laugh when i read you because it's obvious
your abso-****in-lutely clueless


I am against that also. Why does Obama give Wall Street all they want?

because george bush and other rich, white frat boys, rigged the system
so we have no choice. it's either bail out the rich or let the banking
system go down in flames...like in 29.

that's why the banks are fighting so hard against regulation. and why
people like richard shelby, GOP of alabama...are carrying their water
for them. protect the rich

You seem to forget it was democrat congress that created TARP and Obama
was all for it. In fact, he spent the his share (and then some) once in
office.

Bailouts should have never occured. They are all bad be it Bush or
Obama. Just corruption.

--
--------------
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.

In article ,
says...

On 30/03/2010 4:14 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:50:52 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:45:26 -0400, wrote:



That works so well for welfare. Breeding more deadbeats and getting
others to pay for it ****es me off. Now you want to add a whole new
level? Welfare checks *and* free health care?

how about welfare for wall street?

you right wingers.....i laugh when i read you because it's obvious
your abso-****in-lutely clueless


I am against that also. Why does Obama give Wall Street all they want?

because george bush and other rich, white frat boys, rigged the system
so we have no choice. it's either bail out the rich or let the banking
system go down in flames...like in 29.

that's why the banks are fighting so hard against regulation. and why
people like richard shelby, GOP of alabama...are carrying their water
for them. protect the rich

You seem to forget it was democrat congress that created TARP and Obama
was all for it. In fact, he spent the his share (and then some) once in
office.

Funny how the liars here and in the media forget that fact..

Scotty

Bailouts should have never occured. They are all bad be it Bush or
Obama. Just corruption.



--
For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v

"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

On 30/03/2010 4:14 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:50:52 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:45:26 -0400,
wrote:



That works so well for welfare. Breeding more deadbeats and getting
others to pay for it ****es me off. Now you want to add a whole new
level? Welfare checks *and* free health care?

how about welfare for wall street?

you right wingers.....i laugh when i read you because it's obvious
your abso-****in-lutely clueless


I am against that also. Why does Obama give Wall Street all they
want?

because george bush and other rich, white frat boys, rigged the system
so we have no choice. it's either bail out the rich or let the banking
system go down in flames...like in 29.

that's why the banks are fighting so hard against regulation. and why
people like richard shelby, GOP of alabama...are carrying their water
for them. protect the rich

You seem to forget it was democrat congress that created TARP and Obama
was all for it. In fact, he spent the his share (and then some) once in
office.

Funny how the liars here and in the media forget that fact..


Like you? TARP wasn't "created" by Congress. It was passed by Congress. It
was created by Treasury (i.e., Paulson) and was promoted to Congress as
make-or-break funding to stabilize the economy, which, after some revisions
did as advertised.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:16:31 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...


You seem to forget it was democrat congress that created TARP and Obama
was all for it. In fact, he spent the his share (and then some) once in
office.

Funny how the liars here and in the media forget that fact..

typical right winger. all bitching. no solutions. 25% unemployment?
great. collapse of the economic system? fantastic

as long as the rich are protected.

and TARP was started under bush...he needed to bail out his rich
buddies.

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:41:48 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 30/03/2010 4:14 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:50:52 -0700, "Bill McKee"


that's why the banks are fighting so hard against regulation. and why
people like richard shelby, GOP of alabama...are carrying their water
for them. protect the rich

You seem to forget it was democrat congress that created TARP and Obama
was all for it. In fact, he spent the his share (and then some) once in
office.

as recommended by rich frat boy george bush. and you're missing the
point...no surprise, given you're a right winger

the right wing is, AGAIN, protecting the banks and the rich


Bailouts should have never occured. They are all bad be it Bush or
Obama. Just corruption.

wrong. you have no solution. a big mouth. a racist attitude.

no solution. typical right winger. always bitching. no solutions

In article ,
says...


no solution. typical right winger. always bitching. no solutions


They say never argue with somebody who buys ink by the ton.
Same goes for arguing with a motormouth.
You won't beat this guy down.
Look at Carl Rove. Still won't shut up.
Ever hear about the leg bone being connected to the hip bone?
This is a case of the mouth being connected to the stupid gland.
That gland never dies until its owner leave this troubled earth.
Probably why the ancients took to cutting out tongues.

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:50:52 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:45:26 -0400, Larry wrote:



That works so well for welfare. Breeding more deadbeats and getting
others to pay for it ****es me off. Now you want to add a whole new
level? Welfare checks *and* free health care?

how about welfare for wall street?

you right wingers.....i laugh when i read you because it's obvious
your abso-****in-lutely clueless


I am against that also. Why does Obama give Wall Street all they want?

because george bush and other rich, white frat boys, rigged the system
so we have no choice. it's either bail out the rich or let the banking
system go down in flames...like in 29.

that's why the banks are fighting so hard against regulation. and why
people like richard shelby, GOP of alabama...are carrying their water
for them. protect the rich



The banking system would not have failed. Some brokerage houses would have.
Big F'n deal! Someone else would have taken over the pieces. Citigroup
made $3billion profit in the first quarter, record profits, during a
recession. Mostly because they get all the money they want from the Fed for
0.25% and buy T bills paying 3.5%. Buying the T-bills hides the Governments
debt, and gives the Fed more money to loan at 0.25%. Helps only Citigroup
and the other "banks" doing the same thing. Plus hiding government wasteful
spending. The money is flowing to those rich folks. And it is costing you
and I money. Lots of money. The devaluing of the dollar by government
excess spending is a tax on all of us. Even those of us making less than
$250k. Even the guy on welfare. Happy with the Democrat controlled
Congress who gave us TARP? TARP with no controls. Was not George Bush who
gave us TARP. Was Congress. Bush screwed up and signed the bill, but the
Executive branch can only spend money Congress allocates. Go take a Civics
class, and learn about our form of govenment.