"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:50:52 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:45:26 -0400, Larry wrote:



That works so well for welfare. Breeding more deadbeats and getting
others to pay for it ****es me off. Now you want to add a whole new
level? Welfare checks *and* free health care?

how about welfare for wall street?

you right wingers.....i laugh when i read you because it's obvious
your abso-****in-lutely clueless


I am against that also. Why does Obama give Wall Street all they want?

because george bush and other rich, white frat boys, rigged the system
so we have no choice. it's either bail out the rich or let the banking
system go down in flames...like in 29.

that's why the banks are fighting so hard against regulation. and why
people like richard shelby, GOP of alabama...are carrying their water
for them. protect the rich



The banking system would not have failed. Some brokerage houses would have.
Big F'n deal! Someone else would have taken over the pieces. Citigroup
made $3billion profit in the first quarter, record profits, during a
recession. Mostly because they get all the money they want from the Fed for
0.25% and buy T bills paying 3.5%. Buying the T-bills hides the Governments
debt, and gives the Fed more money to loan at 0.25%. Helps only Citigroup
and the other "banks" doing the same thing. Plus hiding government wasteful
spending. The money is flowing to those rich folks. And it is costing you
and I money. Lots of money. The devaluing of the dollar by government
excess spending is a tax on all of us. Even those of us making less than
$250k. Even the guy on welfare. Happy with the Democrat controlled
Congress who gave us TARP? TARP with no controls. Was not George Bush who
gave us TARP. Was Congress. Bush screwed up and signed the bill, but the
Executive branch can only spend money Congress allocates. Go take a Civics
class, and learn about our form of govenment.