![]() |
additional navigation lights.
My Marquis has the little Vav. lights on the sides located almost
midships, and nothing on the bow. I really think that's an odd arrangement but so be it, and I would think that they should actually be located on the bow so the length of the boat can be juddged at night. a couple questions. would it be better to remove them and go with a bow Nav light? or is it legal to run both green/red on bow and sides at the same time? I'm opting for putting a Nav. llight on the bow myself. |
additional navigation lights.
"Tim" wrote in message
... My Marquis has the little Vav. lights on the sides located almost midships, and nothing on the bow. I really think that's an odd arrangement but so be it, and I would think that they should actually be located on the bow so the length of the boat can be juddged at night. a couple questions. would it be better to remove them and go with a bow Nav light? or is it legal to run both green/red on bow and sides at the same time? I'm opting for putting a Nav. llight on the bow myself. No expert here, but I'm betting that you can only have one set that's operating at a time. You could check the rules and/or get in touch with the Coast Guard. http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/rotr_online.htm -- Nom=de=Plume |
additional navigation lights.
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:34:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: My Marquis has the little Vav. lights on the sides located almost midships, and nothing on the bow. I really think that's an odd arrangement but so be it, and I would think that they should actually be located on the bow so the length of the boat can be juddged at night. a couple questions. would it be better to remove them and go with a bow Nav light? or is it legal to run both green/red on bow and sides at the same time? I'm opting for putting a Nav. llight on the bow myself. Actually having them on the sides gives other boats a better picture of what they are dealing with as long as your projected angles of visibility are more or less correct. I'd leave them alone. The best nav light of all is a tri color located as high up as you can get it, easy for sailboats, much more difficult for power boats. It is very important to be seen. Height and brightness are your friends in that respect. |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 20, 11:04*pm, wrote:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:34:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My Marquis has the little Vav. lights on the sides located almost midships, and nothing on the bow. I really think that's an odd arrangement but so be it, and I would think that they should actually be located on the bow so the length of the boat can be juddged at night. a couple questions. would it be better to remove them and go with a bow Nav light? or is it legal to run both green/red on bow and sides at the same time? I'm opting for putting a Nav. llight on the bow myself. Your existing lights are perfectly legal. Most ships have their nav lights mounted on the superstructure. I would imagine so, but to me it doesn't make sense to only be able to judge half the boats length by having a 23' boat look like it's only 12. |
additional navigation lights.
"Tim" wrote in message ... On Mar 20, 11:04 pm, wrote: On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:34:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My Marquis has the little Vav. lights on the sides located almost midships, and nothing on the bow. I really think that's an odd arrangement but so be it, and I would think that they should actually be located on the bow so the length of the boat can be juddged at night. a couple questions. would it be better to remove them and go with a bow Nav light? or is it legal to run both green/red on bow and sides at the same time? I'm opting for putting a Nav. llight on the bow myself. Your existing lights are perfectly legal. Most ships have their nav lights mounted on the superstructure. I would imagine so, but to me it doesn't make sense to only be able to judge half the boats length by having a 23' boat look like it's only 12. The boat's length has nothing to do with it. It's a matter of knowing the orientation of the boat, it's rough heading, and what you need to do (or not do) to avoid a collision. Your nav lights are perfectly suited for that purpose. --Mike |
additional navigation lights.
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:01:38 -0400, I am Tosk
wrote: I would imagine so, but to me it doesn't make sense to only be able to judge half the boats length by having a 23' boat look like it's only 12. I don't think it's as easy to judge length at night, despite where the lights are located. Judging length is actually not that important except with very large boats like freighters, or tug boats pulling a barge. One of the best things a small boat can do to improve its visibility is to install a radar reflector mounted as high off the water as possible. http://www.defender.com/ProductDisplay?id=82874 Mounting can be as simple as suspending from a boat hook held in a fishing rod holder. |
additional navigation lights.
The nav rules read that the red & green lights are to be visible from
"dead ahead to 2 points abaft the port and starboard beam" . So your lights quailfy and are legal. You didn't mention a white light, but that is to be visible in a 32 point arc. Yours is probably over the windshield or at the stern. Happy boating, Norm (boy, do I miss it) |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 9:39*am, (N.L. Eckert) wrote:
The nav rules read that the red & green lights are to be visible from "dead ahead to *2 points abaft the port and starboard beam" . *So your lights quailfy and are legal. *You didn't mention a white light, but that is to be visible *in a *32 point arc. Yours is probably over the windshield or at the stern. Happy boating, *Norm *(boy, do I miss it) Thanks for all the great advice. I suppose I was concerned abotu using Nav. lights on the bow instead of the sides, is because that's what I'm used to seeing. My 27' Chris Craft had a bow light, and this is the first boat I've owned that they were on the sides. the light on the aft is not suspended like what you would think on a pole, but is in the middle of the stern. It kind of reminds you of a back up light if anything else. |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 6:29*am, W1TEF wrote:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:34:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My Marquis has the little Vav. lights on the sides located almost midships, and nothing on the bow. I really think that's an odd arrangement but so be it, and I would think that they should actually be located on the bow so the length of the boat can be juddged at night. a couple questions. would it be better to remove them and go with a bow Nav light? or is it legal to run both green/red on bow and sides at the same time? I'm opting for putting a Nav. llight on the bow myself. Two sets of nav. lights ain't legal. As to positioning, they are fine where they are. *Nav lights aren't used to judge length, but position and bearing. Pick up a copy of the Inland/International navigation rules or read them online - you can also download a copy in PDF format I believe. http://www.amazon.com/Navigation-Rul.../dp/0939837498 http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/rotr_online.htm Thanks for those links, Tom. I will be doing some studying. I suppose the reason I'm asking all these questions about Nav. Lights is I want to update my boat to better standards and make it as safe as I can. |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 5:30*am, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:01:38 -0400, I am Tosk wrote: I would imagine so, but to me it doesn't make sense to only be able to judge half the boats length by having a 23' boat look like it's only 12. I don't think it's as easy to judge length at night, despite where the lights are located. Judging length is actually not that important except with very large boats like freighters, or tug boats pulling a barge. *One of the best things a small boat can do to improve its visibility is to install a radar reflector mounted as high off the water as possible. http://www.defender.com/ProductDisplay?id=82874 Mounting can be as simple as suspending from a boat hook held in a fishing *rod holder. That is taken into consideration as well, Wayne. Thanks! I also have a clip-on white light that is fairly light and battery operated, and can be suspended from the windshield if need be. The D-batteries are down low so there is little weight up top. and it's actually about 3 ft. long so that would be at least 3 ft. above the windshield. |
additional navigation lights.
"W1TEF" wrote in message
... On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:34:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My Marquis has the little Vav. lights on the sides located almost midships, and nothing on the bow. I really think that's an odd arrangement but so be it, and I would think that they should actually be located on the bow so the length of the boat can be juddged at night. a couple questions. would it be better to remove them and go with a bow Nav light? or is it legal to run both green/red on bow and sides at the same time? I'm opting for putting a Nav. llight on the bow myself. Two sets of nav lights ain't legal. As to positioning, they are fine where they are. Nav lights aren't used to judge length, but position and bearing. Pick up a copy of the Inland/International navigation rules or read them online - you can also download a copy in PDF format I believe. http://www.amazon.com/Navigation-Rul.../dp/0939837498 http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/rotr_online.htm I bet they are if you use them at the same time. I don't see any mention of it on the uscg.gov link, but that doesn't mean it's ok. Do you have something you can point to that clarifies? -- Nom=de=Plume |
additional navigation lights.
"mgg" wrote in message ... "Tim" wrote in message ... On Mar 20, 11:04 pm, wrote: On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:34:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My Marquis has the little Vav. lights on the sides located almost midships, and nothing on the bow. I really think that's an odd arrangement but so be it, and I would think that they should actually be located on the bow so the length of the boat can be juddged at night. a couple questions. would it be better to remove them and go with a bow Nav light? or is it legal to run both green/red on bow and sides at the same time? I'm opting for putting a Nav. llight on the bow myself. Your existing lights are perfectly legal. Most ships have their nav lights mounted on the superstructure. I would imagine so, but to me it doesn't make sense to only be able to judge half the boats length by having a 23' boat look like it's only 12. The boat's length has nothing to do with it. It's a matter of knowing the orientation of the boat, it's rough heading, and what you need to do (or not do) to avoid a collision. Your nav lights are perfectly suited for that purpose. --Mike If they are on the bow, then someone is going to figure it is a small skiff. |
additional navigation lights.
"CalifBill" wrote in message
... "mgg" wrote in message ... "Tim" wrote in message ... On Mar 20, 11:04 pm, wrote: On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:34:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My Marquis has the little Vav. lights on the sides located almost midships, and nothing on the bow. I really think that's an odd arrangement but so be it, and I would think that they should actually be located on the bow so the length of the boat can be juddged at night. a couple questions. would it be better to remove them and go with a bow Nav light? or is it legal to run both green/red on bow and sides at the same time? I'm opting for putting a Nav. llight on the bow myself. Your existing lights are perfectly legal. Most ships have their nav lights mounted on the superstructure. I would imagine so, but to me it doesn't make sense to only be able to judge half the boats length by having a 23' boat look like it's only 12. The boat's length has nothing to do with it. It's a matter of knowing the orientation of the boat, it's rough heading, and what you need to do (or not do) to avoid a collision. Your nav lights are perfectly suited for that purpose. --Mike If they are on the bow, then someone is going to figure it is a small skiff. Aren't most nav lights on or near the bow of most boats??? -- Nom=de=Plume |
additional navigation lights.
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:06:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: Aren't most nav lights on or near the bow of most boats??? No. |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 12:42*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:54:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 21, 5:30*am, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:01:38 -0400, I am Tosk wrote: I would imagine so, but to me it doesn't make sense to only be able to judge half the boats length by having a 23' boat look like it's only 12. I don't think it's as easy to judge length at night, despite where the lights are located. Judging length is actually not that important except with very large boats like freighters, or tug boats pulling a barge. *One of the best things a small boat can do to improve its visibility is to install a radar reflector mounted as high off the water as possible. http://www.defender.com/ProductDisplay?id=82874 Mounting can be as simple as suspending from a boat hook held in a fishing *rod holder. That is taken into consideration as well, Wayne. Thanks! *I also have a clip-on white light that is fairly light and battery operated, *and can be suspended from *the windshield if need be. The D-batteries are down low so there is little weight up top. and it's actually about 3 ft. long so that would be at least 3 ft. above the windshield. One of the most important things about nav lights, or any other lights is that you should not be able to see them from the helm. Those folks with that big "all around" white light on the stern are not really serious about going out at night. You should have a stern light that points back and a mast head light that points side and forward but not in the helmsman's line of sight. It should be shielded below and not reflected off the boat forward of the helm. Otherwise it destroys your night vision and prompts people to want "headlights" that destroy everyone elses night vision (besides being illegal) If you actually boat anywhere near a big population center it won't really get dark at night anyway. Around the Estero Bay you can see just fine as soon as you let your eyes get used to the dark. You certainly can see something 100' away better than you would with a spotlight. The spotlight only lights up the particular thing you are looking at, not the thing you weren't expecting a few degrees abeam of your light. K. Now this is all starting to make sense to me. Forgive my persistence, because ignorance isn't bliss. |
additional navigation lights.
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:49:22 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote: Pick up a copy of the Inland/International navigation rules or read them online - you can also download a copy in PDF format I believe. http://www.amazon.com/Navigation-Rul.../dp/0939837498 http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/rotr_online.htm Thanks for those links, Tom. I will be doing some studying. I suppose the reason I'm asking all these questions about Nav. Lights is I want to update my boat to better standards and make it as safe as I can. I'd leave the lights alone for now as long as they are working OK since there are probably other things that need a look. Running at night is very tricky even for the experienced, and should really be avoided when possible. Take it real slow, especially the first few times. Everything that looks familiar during daylight looks entirely different in the dark, and distances are much more difficult to judge accurately. Back in my sailboat days I ran literally thousands of miles in the dark with no incidents and no radar but with a few close calls, some way too close for comfort. Now that I've gotten used to running with radar at night I would never operate without it if at all possible. Even radar is not perfect however. Off the coast of the Dominican Republic we were surprised several times by small wooden fishing skiffs operating 12 or more miles offshore with no lights and no radar image at all. They are totally invisible until you are almost on them, even in daylight. They would see us however and either yell or shine a light at us, not a really satisfactory way of navigating. That's one of my reasons for recommending a good radar reflector. |
additional navigation lights.
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:06:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Aren't most nav lights on or near the bow of most boats??? No. Really? Just about every sailboat I've seen at marina have bow lights and a stern light. Some have lights at the top of the mast also. I think I've seen the same at the bow for most powerboats, but I didn't really look. -- Nom=de=Plume |
additional navigation lights.
On 3/21/10 5:27 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:06:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Aren't most nav lights on or near the bow of most boats??? No. Really? Just about every sailboat I've seen at marina have bow lights and a stern light. Some have lights at the top of the mast also. I think I've seen the same at the bow for most powerboats, but I didn't really look. W'hine's counted all the boats and those are his results. -- If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher) then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer. |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 4:21*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:49:22 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: Pick up a copy of the Inland/International navigation rules or read them online - you can also download a copy in PDF format I believe. http://www.amazon.com/Navigation-Rul.../dp/0939837498 http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/rotr_online.htm Thanks for those links, Tom. I will be doing some studying. I suppose the reason I'm asking all these questions about Nav. Lights is I want to update my boat *to better standards and make it as safe as I can. I'd leave the lights alone for now as long as they are working OK since there are probably other things that need a look. * Running at night is very tricky even for the experienced, and should really be avoided when possible. *Take it real slow, especially the first few times. * Everything that looks familiar during daylight looks entirely different in the dark, and distances are much more difficult to judge accurately. Back in my sailboat days I ran literally thousands of miles in the dark with no incidents and no radar but with a few close calls, some way too close for comfort. *Now that I've gotten used to running with radar at night I would never operate without it if at all possible. * Even radar is not perfect however. *Off the coast of the Dominican Republic we were surprised several times by small wooden fishing skiffs operating 12 or more miles offshore with no lights and no radar image at all. *They are totally invisible until you are almost on them, even in daylight. *They would see us however and either yell or shine a light at us, not a really satisfactory way of navigating. That's one of my reasons for recommending a good radar reflector. Well, the lights arn't a big issue to mount or detach, so it's going into the 'things--to-do-list... Now I understand why you mentioned the radar deflector, Wayne. Not that it's some whirlie gig but it actually helps others who run radar to detect you. Thanks! |
additional navigation lights.
nom=de=plume wrote:
"CalifBill" wrote in message ... "mgg" wrote in message ... "Tim" wrote in message ... On Mar 20, 11:04 pm, wrote: On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:34:34 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: My Marquis has the little Vav. lights on the sides located almost midships, and nothing on the bow. I really think that's an odd arrangement but so be it, and I would think that they should actually be located on the bow so the length of the boat can be juddged at night. a couple questions. would it be better to remove them and go with a bow Nav light? or is it legal to run both green/red on bow and sides at the same time? I'm opting for putting a Nav. llight on the bow myself. Your existing lights are perfectly legal. Most ships have their nav lights mounted on the superstructure. I would imagine so, but to me it doesn't make sense to only be able to judge half the boats length by having a 23' boat look like it's only 12. The boat's length has nothing to do with it. It's a matter of knowing the orientation of the boat, it's rough heading, and what you need to do (or not do) to avoid a collision. Your nav lights are perfectly suited for that purpose. --Mike If they are on the bow, then someone is going to figure it is a small skiff. Aren't most nav lights on or near the bow of most boats??? no |
additional navigation lights.
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:06:43 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Aren't most nav lights on or near the bow of most boats??? No. All the ones in the marina have them at the bow. I don't know about all the possible configurations of powerboats, but the ones I recall had them at the bow. So, where are you getting this claim? -- Nom=de=Plume |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 11:42*am, wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:54:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Mar 21, 5:30*am, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:01:38 -0400, I am Tosk wrote: I would imagine so, but to me it doesn't make sense to only be able to judge half the boats length by having a 23' boat look like it's only 12. I don't think it's as easy to judge length at night, despite where the lights are located. Judging length is actually not that important except with very large boats like freighters, or tug boats pulling a barge. *One of the best things a small boat can do to improve its visibility is to install a radar reflector mounted as high off the water as possible. http://www.defender.com/ProductDisplay?id=82874 Mounting can be as simple as suspending from a boat hook held in a fishing *rod holder. That is taken into consideration as well, Wayne. Thanks! *I also have a clip-on white light that is fairly light and battery operated, *and can be suspended from *the windshield if need be. The D-batteries are down low so there is little weight up top. and it's actually about 3 ft. long so that would be at least 3 ft. above the windshield. One of the most important things about nav lights, or any other lights is that you should not be able to see them from the helm. Those folks with that big "all around" white light on the stern are not really serious about going out at night. You should have a stern light that points back and a mast head light that points side and forward but not in the helmsman's line of sight. It should be shielded below and not reflected off the boat forward of the helm. Otherwise it destroys your night vision and prompts people to want "headlights" that destroy everyone elses night vision (besides being illegal) If you actually boat anywhere near a big population center it won't really get dark at night anyway. Around the Estero Bay you can see just fine as soon as you let your eyes get used to the dark. You certainly can see something 100' away better than you would with a spotlight. The spotlight only lights up the particular thing you are looking at, not the thing you weren't expecting a few degrees abeam of your light.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Pardner, I see what you're saying now... http://content.answers.com/main/cont...g/f0196-01.jpg |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 10:45*am, Tim wrote:
the light on the aft is not suspended like what you would think on a pole, but is in the middle of the stern. It kind of reminds you of a back up light if anything else. http://bestvaluexpress.com/images/uploads/33077.gif |
additional navigation lights.
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:30:50 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:01:38 -0400, I am Tosk wrote: I would imagine so, but to me it doesn't make sense to only be able to judge half the boats length by having a 23' boat look like it's only 12. I don't think it's as easy to judge length at night, despite where the lights are located. Judging length is actually not that important except with very large boats like freighters, or tug boats pulling a barge. One of the best things a small boat can do to improve its visibility is to install a radar reflector mounted as high off the water as possible. http://www.defender.com/ProductDisplay?id=82874 Mounting can be as simple as suspending from a boat hook held in a fishing rod holder. Another reason these $5 million dollar boats should have rod holders. I knew it. -- John H For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 8:39*am, (N.L. Eckert) wrote:
The nav rules read that the red & green lights are to be visible from "dead ahead to *2 points abaft the port and starboard beam" . *So your lights quailfy and are legal. *You didn't mention a white light, but that is to be visible *in a *32 point arc. Yours is probably over the windshield or at the stern. Happy boating, *Norm *(boy, do I miss it) Thanks Norm. I would suppose my set up would be described like this w/ exception of the 'radar tower' light http://www.safeboating.org.au/images...ure%20shot.jpg |
additional navigation lights.
the light on the aft is not suspended like what you would think on a pole, but is in the middle of the stern. It kind of reminds you of a back up light if anything else. Based on that nugget of information, it would appear that your boat is lit under international rules versus inland rules. That means there is a companion to the stern light you describe. There should be a forward-facing white light on a pole that plugs into a socket of some sort, probably located on your upper windshield frame. It could also be a light on a pole that is permanently attached, but can be folded down. This forward facing white light, combined with the stern light on the transom combine to satisfy the 32 points of required coverage. Suggest you focus your efforts on finding that other white light (unless you have it and just failed to mention it) rather than the worrying about the red and green lights, which are just fine where they are. |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 3:21*pm, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:49:22 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: Pick up a copy of the Inland/International navigation rules or read them online - you can also download a copy in PDF format I believe. http://www.amazon.com/Navigation-Rul.../dp/0939837498 http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/rotr_online.htm Thanks for those links, Tom. I will be doing some studying. I suppose the reason I'm asking all these questions about Nav. Lights is I want to update my boat *to better standards and make it as safe as I can. I'd leave the lights alone for now as long as they are working OK since there are probably other things that need a look. * Running at night is very tricky even for the experienced, and should really be avoided when possible. *Take it real slow, especially the first few times. * Everything that looks familiar during daylight looks entirely different in the dark, and distances are much more difficult to judge accurately. Back in my sailboat days I ran literally thousands of miles in the dark with no incidents and no radar but with a few close calls, some way too close for comfort. *Now that I've gotten used to running with radar at night I would never operate without it if at all possible. * Even radar is not perfect however. *Off the coast of the Dominican Republic we were surprised several times by small wooden fishing skiffs operating 12 or more miles offshore with no lights and no radar image at all. *They are totally invisible until you are almost on them, even in daylight. *They would see us however and either yell or shine a light at us, not a really satisfactory way of navigating. That's one of my reasons for recommending a good radar reflector. Wayne, I don't want to run at night, even on my wide Carlyle Lake. And I dont' plan to, but I wan't my boat to be set up better'n spec. |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 7:42*pm, John H wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:30:50 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 05:01:38 -0400, I am Tosk wrote: I would imagine so, but to me it doesn't make sense to only be able to judge half the boats length by having a 23' boat look like it's only 12. I don't think it's as easy to judge length at night, despite where the lights are located. Judging length is actually not that important except with very large boats like freighters, or tug boats pulling a barge. *One of the best things a small boat can do to improve its visibility is to install a radar reflector mounted as high off the water as possible. http://www.defender.com/ProductDisplay?id=82874 Mounting can be as simple as suspending from a boat hook held in a fishing *rod holder. Another reason these $5 million dollar boats should have rod holders. I knew it. -- John H For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - John, If you bump up to billion dollar boats, they come with rod holders as standard equipment! http://armchairhawaii.com/Attraction...eship/guns.jpg |
additional navigation lights.
In article ced8cd5d-d10e-4792-8c2a-
, says... On Mar 21, 3:21*pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:49:22 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: Pick up a copy of the Inland/International navigation rules or read them online - you can also download a copy in PDF format I believe. http://www.amazon.com/Navigation-Rul.../dp/0939837498 http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/rotr_online.htm Thanks for those links, Tom. I will be doing some studying. I suppose the reason I'm asking all these questions about Nav. Lights is I want to update my boat *to better standards and make it as safe as I can. I'd leave the lights alone for now as long as they are working OK since there are probably other things that need a look. * Running at night is very tricky even for the experienced, and should really be avoided when possible. *Take it real slow, especially the first few times. * Everything that looks familiar during daylight looks entirely different in the dark, and distances are much more difficult to judge accurately. Back in my sailboat days I ran literally thousands of miles in the dark with no incidents and no radar but with a few close calls, some way too close for comfort. *Now that I've gotten used to running with radar at night I would never operate without it if at all possible. * Even radar is not perfect however. *Off the coast of the Dominican Republic we were surprised several times by small wooden fishing skiffs operating 12 or more miles offshore with no lights and no radatr image at all. *They are totally invisible until you are almost on them, even in daylight. *They would see us however and either yell or shine a light at us, not a really satisfactory way of navigating. That's one of my reasons for recommending a good radar reflector. Wayne, I don't want to run at night, even on my wide Carlyle Lake. And I dont' plan to, but I wan't my boat to be set up better'n spec. Oh man, being out at night on an open area is awesome. Make sure your lights are set up right like they said so you don't see them from the cockpit and they don't reflect off of anything back at you. Then keep the radio off, and always keep the big spotlight moving. If you have two sets of eyes, and two lights, it's even better. Anchored is a bit more complicated but if you set yourself right and keep alert, you are usually ok. Again, I wouldn't do it without a couple of those million candle power lights, hand held and moving around a lot. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 7:45*pm, "RG" wrote:
the light on the aft is not suspended like what you would think on a pole, but is in the middle of the stern. It kind of reminds you of a back up light if anything else. Based on that nugget of information, it would appear that your boat is lit under international rules versus inland rules. *That means there is a companion to the stern light you describe. *There should be a forward-facing white light on a pole that plugs into a socket of some sort, probably located on your upper windshield frame. *It could also be a light on a pole that is permanently attached, but can be folded down. *This forward facing white light, combined with the stern light on the transom combine to satisfy the 32 points of required coverage. *Suggest you focus your efforts on finding that other white light (unless you have it and just failed to mention it) rather than the worrying about the red and green lights, which are just fine where they are. Thanks! I think I remember an un-used socket of some sort up around the windshield area. This boat was origionally used on Lake Erie and the people fished a lot. Could it turely be this boat was set for int'l specs? Odd for a 23 ft. boat, though. |
additional navigation lights.
Could it turely be this boat was set for int'l specs? Odd for a 23 ft. boat, though. It's not odd at all. That's about the size of boat where international lighting starts to become very common. It has nothing to do with where the boat was manufactured or where it is used. Domestic manufacturers will use the international lighting scheme on boats that size and above simply because it is the proper choice for larger vessels. It's also the reason your port and starboard lights are mounted where they are and not as a small combo light on the bow. You really need to buy a copy of Chapman's and study it. Seriously. |
additional navigation lights.
In article ,
says... In article ced8cd5d-d10e-4792-8c2a- , says... On Mar 21, 3:21*pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:49:22 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: Pick up a copy of the Inland/International navigation rules or read them online - you can also download a copy in PDF format I believe. http://www.amazon.com/Navigation-Rul.../dp/0939837498 http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/rotr_online.htm Thanks for those links, Tom. I will be doing some studying. I suppose the reason I'm asking all these questions about Nav. Lights is I want to update my boat *to better standards and make it as safe as I can. I'd leave the lights alone for now as long as they are working OK since there are probably other things that need a look. * Running at night is very tricky even for the experienced, and should really be avoided when possible. *Take it real slow, especially the first few times. * Everything that looks familiar during daylight looks entirely different in the dark, and distances are much more difficult to judge accurately. Back in my sailboat days I ran literally thousands of miles in the dark with no incidents and no radar but with a few close calls, some way too close for comfort. *Now that I've gotten used to running with radar at night I would never operate without it if at all possible. * Even radar is not perfect however. *Off the coast of the Dominican Republic we were surprised several times by small wooden fishing skiffs operating 12 or more miles offshore with no lights and no radatr image at all. *They are totally invisible until you are almost on them, even in daylight. *They would see us however and either yell or shine a light at us, not a really satisfactory way of navigating. That's one of my reasons for recommending a good radar reflector. Wayne, I don't want to run at night, even on my wide Carlyle Lake. And I dont' plan to, but I wan't my boat to be set up better'n spec. Oh man, being out at night on an open area is awesome. Make sure your lights are set up right like they said so you don't see them from the cockpit and they don't reflect off of anything back at you. Then keep the radio off, and always keep the big spotlight moving. If you have two sets of eyes, and two lights, it's even better. Anchored is a bit more complicated but if you set yourself right and keep alert, you are usually ok. Again, I wouldn't do it without a couple of those million candle power lights, hand held and moving around a lot. Scotty I should note that when I say keep the radio off, I don't mean communication radio, I mean keep the tunes off and pay attention to what is around you. One thing I learned was not to necessarily look out for other boats, but look up too! One day I saw this star moving across the sky and realized it was the top light of a tug, moving a huge barge right at me. yikes. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 8:54*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article ced8cd5d-d10e-4792-8c2a- , says... On Mar 21, 3:21*pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:49:22 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: Pick up a copy of the Inland/International navigation rules or read them online - you can also download a copy in PDF format I believe.. http://www.amazon.com/Navigation-Rul.../dp/0939837498 http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/rotr_online.htm Thanks for those links, Tom. I will be doing some studying. I suppose the reason I'm asking all these questions about Nav. Lights is I want to update my boat *to better standards and make it as safe as I can. |
additional navigation lights.
In article 9020e94a-088d-4c28-8c27-cc99cbe7b610@
15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com, says... On Mar 21, 8:54*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article ced8cd5d-d10e-4792-8c2a- , says... On Mar 21, 3:21*pm, Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:49:22 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: Pick up a copy of the Inland/International navigation rules or read them online - you can also download a copy in PDF format I believe. http://www.amazon.com/Navigation-Rul.../dp/0939837498 http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/rotr_online.htm Thanks for those links, Tom. I will be doing some studying. I suppose the reason I'm asking all these questions about Nav. Lights is I want to update my boat *to better standards and make it as safe as I can. I'd leave the lights alone for now as long as they are working OK since there are probably other things that need a look. * Running at night is very tricky even for the experienced, and should really be avoided when possible. *Take it real slow, especially the first few times. * Everything that looks familiar during daylight looks entirely different in the dark, and distances are much more difficult to judge accurately. Back in my sailboat days I ran literally thousands of miles in the dark with no incidents and no radar but with a few close calls, some way too close for comfort. *Now that I've gotten used to running with radar at night I would never operate without it if at all possible. * Even radar is not perfect however. *Off the coast of the Dominican Republic we were surprised several times by small wooden fishing skiffs operating 12 or more miles offshore with no lights and no radatr image at all. *They are totally invisible until you are almost on them, even in daylight. *They would see us however and either yell or shine a light at us, not a really satisfactory way of navigating. That's one of my reasons for recommending a good radar reflector. Wayne, I don't want to run at night, even on my wide Carlyle Lake. And I dont' plan to, but I wan't my boat to be set up better'n spec. Oh man, being out at night on an open area is awesome. Make sure your lights are set up right like they said so you don't see them from the cockpit and they don't reflect off of anything back at you. Then keep the radio off, and always keep the big spotlight moving. If you have two sets of eyes, and two lights, it's even better. Anchored is a bit more complicated but if you set yourself right and keep alert, you are usually ok. Again, I wouldn't do it without a couple of those million candle power lights, hand held and moving around a lot. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first...http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v I have a 3 mil. cp. light that on the lake when it's late and dark especially with no moon, that I will turn on occasionally and do a look around but I think like Gregg said, that could be frowned upon. And I don't run break-neck speed either. Yeah, I am very strict with the kids about the light. They are not to let it shine or reflect into anybody s yard, home, or boat unless you are particularly trying to get their attention. Scotty -- For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
additional navigation lights.
On Mar 21, 9:03*pm, "RG" wrote:
Could it turely be this boat was set for int'l specs? *Odd for a 23 ft. boat, though. It's not odd at all. *That's about the size of boat where international lighting starts to become very common. *It has nothing to do with where the boat was manufactured or where it is used. *Domestic manufacturers will use the international lighting scheme on boats that size and above simply because it is the proper choice for larger vessels. *It's also the reason your port and starboard lights are mounted where they are and not as a small combo light on the bow. *You really need to buy a copy of Chapman's and study it. *Seriously. I'm looking into it, man. Seriously. |
additional navigation lights.
On 3/21/10 10:46 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:09:47 -0700, "nom=de=plume" wrote: All the ones in the marina have them at the bow. Then you are at a marina with nothing but small boats. What an ass you are, w'hine. -- If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher) then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer. |
additional navigation lights.
On 3/21/10 11:23 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , says... On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:54:11 -0400, I am Tosk wrote: Again, I wouldn't do it without a couple of those million candle power lights, hand held and moving around a lot. Sound advice for ruining your night vision. Hrummmph...snort a lot depends on where you boat. I am in smaller, closer water than most here. Most times when we are moving at night it's in skinny water, by oar, with one hanging off the bow with a light and net looking for blue crabs. Don't get all snooty on me here. All of the other traffic in the area will be outfitted similarly in most cases. Scotty Liar. You don't boat...and if you are looking for crabs, just check your underwear. -- If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher) then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer. |
additional navigation lights.
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:12:40 -0400, W1TEF
wrote: Chapman's is a great investment for anyone who is even remotely interested in boats. Hopefully that includes everyone in this group and I know it applies to Tim. I got my first copy sometime back in the early 70s and still refer to it once in a while. I have two copies of "American Practical Navigator" - one published in 1914 and the latest that has all the more modern changes. The differences between the two are significant. My Paternal Grandfather had a copy of "The New American Practical Navigator" which was the book that Bowditch's AMP is based on. It was written in 1802. It now resides in the Peabody Museum in Salem, MA. Personally, Chapman's is great for all around boating, but Bowditch is the Master Course. :) Do you have a copy of Dutton's also? My copy dates back to the 70s or 80s. I believe it was the official navigation text at the the US Naval Academy at that time but I always found Bowditch more useful for most things. Dutton's had information on electronic navigation but that's way out of date at this point. |
additional navigation lights.
On 3/22/10 7:43 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:12:40 -0400, wrote: Chapman's is a great investment for anyone who is even remotely interested in boats. Hopefully that includes everyone in this group and I know it applies to Tim. I got my first copy sometime back in the early 70s and still refer to it once in a while. I have two copies of "American Practical Navigator" - one published in 1914 and the latest that has all the more modern changes. The differences between the two are significant. My Paternal Grandfather had a copy of "The New American Practical Navigator" which was the book that Bowditch's AMP is based on. It was written in 1802. It now resides in the Peabody Museum in Salem, MA. Personally, Chapman's is great for all around boating, but Bowditch is the Master Course. :) Do you have a copy of Dutton's also? My copy dates back to the 70s or 80s. I believe it was the official navigation text at the the US Naval Academy at that time but I always found Bowditch more useful for most things. Dutton's had information on electronic navigation but that's way out of date at this point. snerk -- If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher) then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com