OT
 

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:20:17 -0400, Larry wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:

I was just chain-pulling. I knew you felt that way. I'd add gender change
operations to the list that taxpayers shouldn't pay for.


Is this something you're planning? I've heard March Madness is when
vasectomy operations increase in frequency.


Gender changing and vasectomys are unrelated.

Vacuous. Unreal. The person for whom the word 'twit' was developed.

Hopefully you taught her something.
--
John H

For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v

OT
 

On Mar 20, 10:47*am, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article ,
says...



Don't bother listening to Harry, Jps, and Slammer. They really have no idea
what they are talking about, and of course don't have the character to care...

Scotty

I hope your progress towards blowing a gasket on the exercise bike is
going well, stumpy.

Who are you?

Pffft, it's the panty sniffer, slammer... He must have taken the old rotted
corpse out of the freezer again for the weekend. He will get drunk and go nuts
because he has been shouting at me for months and I fianlly answered.. Next,
will end up getting drunk and ranting off like the cowardly little prick he is,
chase me around the net, then end up in rehab for another 30 days. Here is our
yellow toothed pedophile in all his glory:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HEb1zfGgvw

Watch it with the sound off, it's just as funny. It was bad last time he chased
me to a group with loads of elderly and women (a cooking group) and spewed his
usual "progressive" intolerance and vulgarities. They pretty much laughed at
him, especially when I showed them his videos on the chat channel...snerk.

Scotty

--
Rowdy Mouse Racing, no crybabies!

Keep on the Exerbike, asshole...you'll die soon enough.Your news of a
"heart condition" couldnt have made me happier. Back to the exerbike,
asswipe.
It'll be absolutely hilarious, knowing your lying on a Gurney in the
hallway, because they wont give you much attention, seeing as how you
ripped off the Hospital for 25,000 bucks.
You could, however, do us all a favour and paddle up that muddy creek
with your six-pack and die.......

Hope your long-suffering Wife has your life insurance paid
up....she'll need it once your skanky ass expires. Couldn't happen
fast enough. Then, she can place your stumpy ass in your " punt ", set
in the rest of the kindling, and light it up.... Viking Funeral for a
Coward, COCKSUCKER. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

OT
 

On Mar 20, 10:58*am, hk wrote:
On 3/20/10 10:47 AM, I am Tosk wrote:



In ,
says...

Don't bother listening to Harry, Jps, and Slammer. They really have no idea
what they are talking about, and of course don't have the character to care...

Scotty

I hope your progress towards blowing a gasket on the exercise bike is
going well, stumpy.

Who are you?

Pffft, it's the panty sniffer, slammer... He must have taken the old rotted
corpse out of the freezer again for the weekend. He will get drunk and go nuts
because he has been shouting at me for months and I fianlly answered.. Next,
will end up getting drunk and ranting off like the cowardly little prick he is,
chase me around the net, then end up in rehab for another 30 days. Here is our
yellow toothed pedophile in all his glory:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HEb1zfGgvw

Watch it with the sound off, it's just as funny. It was bad last time he chased
me to a group with loads of elderly and women (a cooking group) and spewed his
usual "progressive" intolerance and vulgarities. They pretty much laughed at
him, especially when I showed them his videos on the chat channel...snerk.

Scotty

SnottyScotty actually believes people pay attention to him.

Have they seen your photos, snotty? You look like a fat, hair-covered
little greaseball.

--

If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say:

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8)
Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher)

then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer.

Obviously not, but I can remedy that........ Notice how the little
troll uses other people in his fights....STILL. He is truly the king "
turd blossom " here.

OT
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

I was just chain-pulling. I knew you felt that way. I'd add gender
change
operations to the list that taxpayers shouldn't pay for.


Is this something you're planning? I've heard March Madness is when
vasectomy operations increase in frequency.


Gender changing and vasectomys are unrelated.


I was going to make that point to her/him, but realized I was wasting my
time.

Eisboch



You've had one or both already?

--
Nom=de=Plume

OT
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Larry" wrote in message
...

The plan they are voting on is nothing like either of these. It really
isn't a plan at all. The fact that Obama wants it passed, with the
admission that they will tweak it later, ****es me off. This is
unprecedented. He's on some personal time frame and doesn't seem to
really care what the meat of the plan is.


I feel the same way. I've been watching interviews with some of the
Congress members who are on the fence regarding their vote on Sunday.
Most are still seeking specific definitions of certain details of "the
plan".

It has been debated for a year and they still aren't sure what they are
voting for?

In the end it will pass due to an enormous amount of arm twisting and
backroom deals. Heh. One member of Congress was calling this bill "the
most transparent" proposal (to the public) that he had ever witnessed in
his 40 years of elected office. But when pressed for specific answers, he
still wasn't sure exactly what some parts of the bill were, what the
language meant or what the ramifications would be.

But, he's leaning towards a "Yes".

Eisboch

And, Obama is pushing it through... how's that? Is he using The Force?

You really need to stop listening to Rush/Beck/Rove.

--
Nom=de=Plume

OT
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...

It's actually going to be even more complicated than that. Every
country that I'm aware of with universal coverage has some sort of
implicit or explicit rationing of care, i.e., if you don't have a
condition that is immediately life threatening, you go on a waiting
list which can stretch out for months or even years.

Should an individual who can afford to pay be allowed to seek out a
doctor or hospital that can provide the care immediately?

I argue yes, otherwise the whole plan reeks of socialism.


The health care system certainly needs a major overhaul. The existing
mess of a system not only affects those individuals who can't afford high
premiums for decent insurance, it affects the whole basis of our economic
system. Small businesses can no longer afford to offer a decent health
plan package for employees. Large businesses are outsourcing as much as
they can to stay competitive in a global economy, contributing to the
unemployment rate.

Yet, the Republicans stand for the status quo. How enlightening. How
effective.

Contrary to the opinion of some here, the primary purpose of a corporation
(large or small) is not to provide a happy, secure shell of existence for
employees. The purpose is to manufacture or provide services at a
profit. The profit can be applied to growth and/or increased income and
benefits for those employed. If there is no profit, benefits have to be
cut and jobs eliminated.

No argument from me. They just shouldn't be in the business of healthcare,
since the pofit motive is diametrically opposed to public health.

I recently got a snapshot of how my former company is doing. Second to
pay, health insurance premiums (the company paid 75 percent when I owned
it) is the largest financial cost to the company. It was when I owned it
and it continues now, except the monthly cost per employee has almost
doubled in less than 10 years.

If I owned the company right now, I suspect I'd be facing a very difficult
decision ... or the decision would be already have been made for me.
Shut the place down. Fortunately, the current owners have deep pockets
and are betting on a single, major technology to recover the financing
they are pouring into it to keep the doors open.

I was also thinking the other day of how ironic some things have become.
Back in 1985 I visited the People's Republic of China. The Chinese
government was experimenting with concepts of capitalism in some remote
sections of the country and my company was invited to visit and explore
possible technology exchanges and marketing opportunities. Prior to this
time, the general Chinese population were mostly kept in the dark with
respect to what the rest of the world was doing and relied upon a
socialistic/communistic form of government to provide for them. During
my visit I remember thinking it was like a time warp, and I had traveled
back about 200 years in time.

Fast forward now to 2010. The experiments in capitalism have led to
China becoming a leading economic world power. The city I visited (Wuxi)
is bustling with business activity. When I was there I witnessed
thousands of people riding around on bicycles or scooters with maybe one
or two automobiles mixed in driven by government officials. I recently
found pictures of the current city of Wuxi. The roads are packed with new
cars owned by the local citizens. Very few bicycles left.

One of the most controlled economies in the world... China. A shining
example?

Meanwhile, the USA is accelerating quickly towards socialism.

Right. This is just looney. You're just terrified of someone. I wonder who
that might be....

Maybe this is acceptable to the "enlightened" ones. As an old fart to
whom this country afforded great opportunities and rewards, I am saddened.

You're also frightened. Grow up.

--
Nom=de=Plume

OT
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Larry" wrote in message
...

The plan they are voting on is nothing like either of these. It really
isn't a plan at all. The fact that Obama wants it passed, with the
admission that they will tweak it later, ****es me off. This is
unprecedented. He's on some personal time frame and doesn't seem to
really care what the meat of the plan is.


I feel the same way. I've been watching interviews with some of the
Congress members who are on the fence regarding their vote on Sunday.
Most are still seeking specific definitions of certain details of "the
plan".

It has been debated for a year and they still aren't sure what they are
voting for?

In the end it will pass due to an enormous amount of arm twisting and
backroom deals. Heh. One member of Congress was calling this bill
"the most transparent" proposal (to the public) that he had ever
witnessed in his 40 years of elected office. But when pressed for
specific answers, he still wasn't sure exactly what some parts of the
bill were, what the language meant or what the ramifications would be.

But, he's leaning towards a "Yes".

Eisboch

And, Obama is pushing it through... how's that? Is he using The Force?

You really need to stop listening to Rush/Beck/Rove.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Actually I was watching Chris Matthews on MSNBC. I don't even know what
channel Fox News is on and, other than newsclips, have never listened to
Rush.

Eisboch

OT
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...


You're also frightened. Grow up.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Sure. Right away. Care to send me one of your 'enlightenment' pills?

Eisboch

OT
 

On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:01:37 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:

I was just chain-pulling. I knew you felt that way. I'd add gender
change
operations to the list that taxpayers shouldn't pay for.


Is this something you're planning? I've heard March Madness is when
vasectomy operations increase in frequency.


Gender changing and vasectomys are unrelated.


I was going to make that point to her/him, but realized I was wasting my
time.

Eisboch

Oh, so you're not a slob, you're a snot.

OT
 

On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:02:39 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
.. .

It's actually going to be even more complicated than that. Every
country that I'm aware of with universal coverage has some sort of
implicit or explicit rationing of care, i.e., if you don't have a
condition that is immediately life threatening, you go on a waiting
list which can stretch out for months or even years.

Should an individual who can afford to pay be allowed to seek out a
doctor or hospital that can provide the care immediately?

I argue yes, otherwise the whole plan reeks of socialism.


The health care system certainly needs a major overhaul. The existing mess
of a system not only affects those individuals who can't afford high
premiums for decent insurance, it affects the whole basis of our economic
system. Small businesses can no longer afford to offer a decent health plan
package for employees. Large businesses are outsourcing as much as they can
to stay competitive in a global economy, contributing to the unemployment
rate.

Contrary to the opinion of some here, the primary purpose of a corporation
(large or small) is not to provide a happy, secure shell of existence for
employees. The purpose is to manufacture or provide services at a profit.
The profit can be applied to growth and/or increased income and benefits for
those employed. If there is no profit, benefits have to be cut and jobs
eliminated.

I recently got a snapshot of how my former company is doing. Second to
pay, health insurance premiums (the company paid 75 percent when I owned it)
is the largest financial cost to the company. It was when I owned it and it
continues now, except the monthly cost per employee has almost doubled in
less than 10 years.

If I owned the company right now, I suspect I'd be facing a very difficult
decision ... or the decision would be already have been made for me. Shut
the place down. Fortunately, the current owners have deep pockets and are
betting on a single, major technology to recover the financing they are
pouring into it to keep the doors open.

I was also thinking the other day of how ironic some things have become.
Back in 1985 I visited the People's Republic of China. The Chinese
government was experimenting with concepts of capitalism in some remote
sections of the country and my company was invited to visit and explore
possible technology exchanges and marketing opportunities. Prior to this
time, the general Chinese population were mostly kept in the dark with
respect to what the rest of the world was doing and relied upon a
socialistic/communistic form of government to provide for them. During my
visit I remember thinking it was like a time warp, and I had traveled back
about 200 years in time.

Fast forward now to 2010. The experiments in capitalism have led to China
becoming a leading economic world power. The city I visited (Wuxi) is
bustling with business activity. When I was there I witnessed thousands of
people riding around on bicycles or scooters with maybe one or two
automobiles mixed in driven by government officials. I recently found
pictures of the current city of Wuxi. The roads are packed with new cars
owned by the local citizens. Very few bicycles left.

Meanwhile, the USA is accelerating quickly towards socialism.

Maybe this is acceptable to the "enlightened" ones. As an old fart to whom
this country afforded great opportunities and rewards, I am saddened.

Eisboch

I knew this would culminate with a head-in-the-ass comment and you did
not disappoint.

Socialism? You been watching Glenn Beck?

China doesn't give a **** if their citizens are exposed to myriad
chemicals that are known carcinogens. Their water is often
contaminated with those same chemicals because they don't have to
spend money controlling their disposal. They make a fraction of
what's required for a living wage in the USA.

I suppose that's okay with you in the name of Chinese profit.

You'd like to recreate China in the US? You'd have to take us back to
the beginning of the industrial revolution when child labor was common
and health care was primitive.

You haven't offered a solution but you've used bumper sticker logic to
back up your position.

How bloody sad that your facile mind cannot travel further than that.