|
Obama moving to limit fishing access
I am Tosk wrote:
Maybe if we are lucky, one of those old folks will kill the old *******. Scotty Hey, I agree that advocating murder is a good thing, what with the Dems in control. But don't give Krause an excuse to sue you. You ain't got no money, and the public defenders are mostly Dems. Jim - We need tort reform. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? -- Nom=de=Plume Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe. "Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no! Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening. Closing Gitmo was his first declaration as president. It's still open. I have a huge concern for a president who can't follow through with a relatively simple task, but wants to tackle universal health care - something that less than half of his constituents want under it's current terms. Why do you think it's a relatively simple task? Even Bush wanted to close it, and that brilliant mind of his (Karl Rove) couldn't get it done. Please show me where he's even talking about universal healthcare? He's not, although it would be a great thing... as all other 1st world countries have it. And, just so you're clear on the facts, something like 70% of the public is in favor of a public option. Get real. Closing Gitmo is simple compared to passing a huge health care bill with so many unanswered questions. I guess you should be president then. You're so smart. The last thing I read was that he wanted to push it through and make changes later. That's a health care plan? Google "universal health care". I'm not posting any links here. 70%? I don't know where you read that. I haven't read anything over 50%. Nothing to do with universal health care. The public option (basically Medicare for all) is extremely popular. Sorry if you missed the boat. Same-same. I didn't miss anything. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message ... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? -- Nom=de=Plume Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe. "Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no! Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening. -- Nom=de=Plume The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed. How did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan liquidity? Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some inside information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking point. -- Nom=de=Plume Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain? So far, you haven't shown it in public. -- Nom=de=Plume And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum And another demonstration of your lack of ability to cite facts. You cite old news and incite other people with a lot of BS (cookie?). Care to try to post on-topic once a day, at least? Feel free to do the same. I cited an article but you have nothing to say except it's old. Too bad for you! Old *and* irrelevant. You should read these article _before_ you post them. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? I never said that. I've also never posted a political link - old or current - to a boating group and I'm not going to start now. You're right. You never said it. Yet, you claim it's "old" but won't supply something more recent. Not much of an argument in favor of your position. You do have an opinion right? Sure, but you will be very unhappy to hear that I don't think either side has the right solutions all of the time. Lately the left has failed us and your old news doesn't support it any longer. Please show me where I said either side has all the solutions. Lately, the "left" is not having the intestinal fortitude they should, but compared to the previous admin., they're god-like. That's insane. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
hk wrote:
On 3/19/10 9:03 PM, Larry wrote: hk wrote: On 3/19/10 5:10 PM, Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message ... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:18:33 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe. really? 25% unemployment looks good? oh. i forgot. you're right wing. to the right wing, the middle class should ALWAYS get screwed I am middle class, and my kids are middle class and they are getting screwed by this administration and the Wall Street you hate. How come we still have all this unemployment and middle class with little spending money and Wall Street is giving out billions of bucks in bonus money? Middle class huh? Maybe barely. Why don't you tell us about all the money you made on your patents? Then, you can claim I'm not a PA. -- Nom=de=Plume I did not make a lot of money on my patents. I made a lot of money being a really good engineer and investing the money that I had by living below my means. Thus, you are middle class. Way to go. You show them rich folk. -- Nom=de=Plume \ Don't you wish you could have been a successful patent atty. Don't you wish you could have made 1/4 of the money I made as one? -- Nom=de=Plume I doubt you made much. I doubt you were worth a **** as an attorney. Probably suspended if you were ever an attorney. Your doubts and five bucks will get you a cup of coffee at starbucks. If that is too abstract for you...your doubts are worth...nothing. Why the need to defend her, Harry? She is full of double talk and adds nothing on-topic to this group. I'm not defending anyone. I'm just a bit weary of the gang of right-wing assholes here who gang up and pile on those whose opinions differ from theirs. The gang of right-wing assholes includes Bill McKee (aka bilious bill), herring the racist, scotty the stupid, jackoff, and the bunch of ID spoofing-ID changing retardos, et cetera. If any of them behaved the way they do here in any reasonable bar, they'd be pounded into the pavement every other night by the regulars. Calm down. This was a mild debate at best. No one is ganging up on anyone. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:27:46 -0400, Larry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? I never said that. I've also never posted a political link - old or current - to a boating group and I'm not going to start now. You're right. You never said it. Yet, you claim it's "old" but won't supply something more recent. Not much of an argument in favor of your position. You do have an opinion right? Sure, but you will be very unhappy to hear that I don't think either side has the right solutions all of the time. Lately the left has failed us and your old news doesn't support it any longer. Please show me where I said either side has all the solutions. Lately, the "left" is not having the intestinal fortitude they should, but compared to the previous admin., they're god-like. That's insane. I'm waiting for nincdepoop to jump into the pig semen thread with both feet. Should be fun to watch. -- John H For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"Larry" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? -- Nom=de=Plume Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe. "Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no! Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening. Closing Gitmo was his first declaration as president. It's still open. I have a huge concern for a president who can't follow through with a relatively simple task, but wants to tackle universal health care - something that less than half of his constituents want under it's current terms. Why do you think it's a relatively simple task? Even Bush wanted to close it, and that brilliant mind of his (Karl Rove) couldn't get it done. Please show me where he's even talking about universal healthcare? He's not, although it would be a great thing... as all other 1st world countries have it. And, just so you're clear on the facts, something like 70% of the public is in favor of a public option. Get real. Closing Gitmo is simple compared to passing a huge health care bill with so many unanswered questions. I guess you should be president then. You're so smart. The last thing I read was that he wanted to push it through and make changes later. That's a health care plan? Google "universal health care". I'm not posting any links here. 70%? I don't know where you read that. I haven't read anything over 50%. Nothing to do with universal health care. The public option (basically Medicare for all) is extremely popular. Sorry if you missed the boat. Same-same. I didn't miss anything. Isn't same-same. Universal is single-payer. Public option is a choice of public or private. You missed a lot (not counting the facts). -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"Larry" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message ... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? -- Nom=de=Plume Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe. "Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no! Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening. -- Nom=de=Plume The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed. How did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan liquidity? Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some inside information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking point. -- Nom=de=Plume Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain? So far, you haven't shown it in public. -- Nom=de=Plume And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum And another demonstration of your lack of ability to cite facts. You cite old news and incite other people with a lot of BS (cookie?). Care to try to post on-topic once a day, at least? Feel free to do the same. I cited an article but you have nothing to say except it's old. Too bad for you! Old *and* irrelevant. You should read these article _before_ you post them. You should read them and understand them before you comment on them... if that's possible for you. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"Larry" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? I never said that. I've also never posted a political link - old or current - to a boating group and I'm not going to start now. You're right. You never said it. Yet, you claim it's "old" but won't supply something more recent. Not much of an argument in favor of your position. You do have an opinion right? Sure, but you will be very unhappy to hear that I don't think either side has the right solutions all of the time. Lately the left has failed us and your old news doesn't support it any longer. Please show me where I said either side has all the solutions. Lately, the "left" is not having the intestinal fortitude they should, but compared to the previous admin., they're god-like. That's insane. In your "rational" opinion.... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"John H" wrote in message
... On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:27:46 -0400, Larry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? I never said that. I've also never posted a political link - old or current - to a boating group and I'm not going to start now. You're right. You never said it. Yet, you claim it's "old" but won't supply something more recent. Not much of an argument in favor of your position. You do have an opinion right? Sure, but you will be very unhappy to hear that I don't think either side has the right solutions all of the time. Lately the left has failed us and your old news doesn't support it any longer. Please show me where I said either side has all the solutions. Lately, the "left" is not having the intestinal fortitude they should, but compared to the previous admin., they're god-like. That's insane. I'm waiting for nincdepoop to jump into the pig semen thread with both feet. Should be fun to watch. Apparently, you're right at home there. I wouldn't want to disturb you in your glorious splendor. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message ... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? -- Nom=de=Plume Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe. "Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no! Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening. -- Nom=de=Plume The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed. How did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan liquidity? Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some inside information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking point. -- Nom=de=Plume Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain? So far, you haven't shown it in public. -- Nom=de=Plume And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum And another demonstration of your lack of ability to cite facts. You cite old news and incite other people with a lot of BS (cookie?). Care to try to post on-topic once a day, at least? Feel free to do the same. I cited an article but you have nothing to say except it's old. Too bad for you! Old *and* irrelevant. You should read these article _before_ you post them. You should read them and understand them before you comment on them... if that's possible for you. I did and it was OLD news. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"Larry" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message ... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? -- Nom=de=Plume Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe. "Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no! Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening. -- Nom=de=Plume The only reason the layoffs are slowing is at least 20% of the workforce is out of work. Lots of the working at underemployed. How did that bank bailout help? Stopped foreclosures? Helped in loan liquidity? Really? The only reason. And you know this because you have some inside information? Or, more likely, you're listening to someone's talking point. -- Nom=de=Plume Nope, I have an analytical brain. You have a brain? So far, you haven't shown it in public. -- Nom=de=Plume And another brainless comment by nom-de-dum And another demonstration of your lack of ability to cite facts. You cite old news and incite other people with a lot of BS (cookie?). Care to try to post on-topic once a day, at least? Feel free to do the same. I cited an article but you have nothing to say except it's old. Too bad for you! Old *and* irrelevant. You should read these article _before_ you post them. You should read them and understand them before you comment on them... if that's possible for you. I did and it was OLD news. Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"hk" wrote in message m... On 3/20/10 10:42 AM, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 20, 10:26 am, wrote: On 3/20/10 9:57 AM, I am Tosk wrote: Harry and his crew specialize in ripping off retirement funds from old folks... He probably should have gone to jail after Uuilco, who knows, maybe he did. It might explain why he never seems to get outside. No pensioner or future pensioner lost a penny of pension or insurance benefit with ULLICO managing or investing the funds, **** for brains. Of course, you wouldn't understand that, having neither a pension or insurance benefit in your name. -- If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher) then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer. Gee, that's not what a few seconds of Google searching turns up......for instance: http://www.m-f-d.org/article/finnamore/wz2rqr5y5hp.php http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/au...ulli-a29.shtml Please highlight the passages in those articles that indicate the pensioners or future pensioners or insurance patrons that lost a penny of pension or insurance benefit, **** for brains... -- If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher) then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer. Any money ripped by the stewards reduces returns to the pensioners. Either through direct loss, or the time value of the ripped money. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
On 3/21/10 1:38 AM, CalifBill wrote:
wrote in message m... On 3/20/10 10:42 AM, Loogypicker wrote: On Mar 20, 10:26 am, wrote: On 3/20/10 9:57 AM, I am Tosk wrote: Harry and his crew specialize in ripping off retirement funds from old folks... He probably should have gone to jail after Uuilco, who knows, maybe he did. It might explain why he never seems to get outside. No pensioner or future pensioner lost a penny of pension or insurance benefit with ULLICO managing or investing the funds, **** for brains. Of course, you wouldn't understand that, having neither a pension or insurance benefit in your name. -- If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher) then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer. Gee, that's not what a few seconds of Google searching turns up......for instance: http://www.m-f-d.org/article/finnamore/wz2rqr5y5hp.php http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/au...ulli-a29.shtml Please highlight the passages in those articles that indicate the pensioners or future pensioners or insurance patrons that lost a penny of pension or insurance benefit, **** for brains... -- If the X-MimeOLE "header" doesn't say: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 (or higher) then it isn't me, it's an ID spoofer. Any money ripped by the stewards reduces returns to the pensioners. Either through direct loss, or the time value of the ripped money. snerk Sorry, but you have no understanding of the situation there at that time. Pensioners got and will continue to receive every penny, same as those with life and/or health insurance. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
On 3/21/10 4:55 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articlep4OdnaSkAoTj9TjWnZ2dnUVZ_jMAAAAA@giganews. com, says... hk wrote: On 3/19/10 9:03 PM, Larry wrote: hk wrote: On 3/19/10 5:10 PM, Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message ... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:18:33 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe. really? 25% unemployment looks good? oh. i forgot. you're right wing. to the right wing, the middle class should ALWAYS get screwed I am middle class, and my kids are middle class and they are getting screwed by this administration and the Wall Street you hate. How come we still have all this unemployment and middle class with little spending money and Wall Street is giving out billions of bucks in bonus money? Middle class huh? Maybe barely. Why don't you tell us about all the money you made on your patents? Then, you can claim I'm not a PA. -- Nom=de=Plume I did not make a lot of money on my patents. I made a lot of money being a really good engineer and investing the money that I had by living below my means. Thus, you are middle class. Way to go. You show them rich folk. -- Nom=de=Plume \ Don't you wish you could have been a successful patent atty. Don't you wish you could have made 1/4 of the money I made as one? -- Nom=de=Plume I doubt you made much. I doubt you were worth a **** as an attorney. Probably suspended if you were ever an attorney. Your doubts and five bucks will get you a cup of coffee at starbucks. If that is too abstract for you...your doubts are worth...nothing. Why the need to defend her, Harry? She is full of double talk and adds nothing on-topic to this group. I'm not defending anyone. I'm just a bit weary of the gang of right-wing assholes here who gang up and pile on those whose opinions differ from theirs. The gang of right-wing assholes includes Bill McKee (aka bilious bill), herring the racist, scotty the stupid, jackoff, and the bunch of ID spoofing-ID changing retardos, et cetera. If any of them behaved the way they do here in any reasonable bar, they'd be pounded into the pavement every other night by the regulars. Calm down. This was a mild debate at best. No one is ganging up on anyone. Harry has way more than a decade of making it up as he goes along here. He is as dishonest as JPS, and vulgar as Slammer the panty sniffer. I would have thought you would have all that by now. Scotty Speaking of right-wing assholes, here we have more b.s. from Scotty Ingersoll, the unemployed, unemployable dipstick who hates the idea of health care insurance reform, but sees nothing wrong with sticking a local hospital with a bill for $25,000. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
On 3/20/10 8:29 PM, Larry wrote:
hk wrote: On 3/19/10 9:03 PM, Larry wrote: hk wrote: On 3/19/10 5:10 PM, Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message ... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:18:33 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe. really? 25% unemployment looks good? oh. i forgot. you're right wing. to the right wing, the middle class should ALWAYS get screwed I am middle class, and my kids are middle class and they are getting screwed by this administration and the Wall Street you hate. How come we still have all this unemployment and middle class with little spending money and Wall Street is giving out billions of bucks in bonus money? Middle class huh? Maybe barely. Why don't you tell us about all the money you made on your patents? Then, you can claim I'm not a PA. -- Nom=de=Plume I did not make a lot of money on my patents. I made a lot of money being a really good engineer and investing the money that I had by living below my means. Thus, you are middle class. Way to go. You show them rich folk. -- Nom=de=Plume \ Don't you wish you could have been a successful patent atty. Don't you wish you could have made 1/4 of the money I made as one? -- Nom=de=Plume I doubt you made much. I doubt you were worth a **** as an attorney. Probably suspended if you were ever an attorney. Your doubts and five bucks will get you a cup of coffee at starbucks. If that is too abstract for you...your doubts are worth...nothing. Why the need to defend her, Harry? She is full of double talk and adds nothing on-topic to this group. I'm not defending anyone. I'm just a bit weary of the gang of right-wing assholes here who gang up and pile on those whose opinions differ from theirs. The gang of right-wing assholes includes Bill McKee (aka bilious bill), herring the racist, scotty the stupid, jackoff, and the bunch of ID spoofing-ID changing retardos, et cetera. If any of them behaved the way they do here in any reasonable bar, they'd be pounded into the pavement every other night by the regulars. Calm down. This was a mild debate at best. No one is ganging up on anyone. You and the right-wing retards sure are... |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
On 3/20/10 8:36 PM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:27:46 -0400, wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? I never said that. I've also never posted a political link - old or current - to a boating group and I'm not going to start now. You're right. You never said it. Yet, you claim it's "old" but won't supply something more recent. Not much of an argument in favor of your position. You do have an opinion right? Sure, but you will be very unhappy to hear that I don't think either side has the right solutions all of the time. Lately the left has failed us and your old news doesn't support it any longer. Please show me where I said either side has all the solutions. Lately, the "left" is not having the intestinal fortitude they should, but compared to the previous admin., they're god-like. That's insane. I'm waiting for nincdepoop to jump into the pig semen thread with both feet. Should be fun to watch. -- John H No piling on, eh, larry? |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
nom=de=plume wrote:
Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose. In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot - including your dumb questions about navigation lights. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"Larry" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose. In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot - including your dumb questions about navigation lights. Never asked any dumb question about lights. I made several statements. However, I have seen a lot of your dumb posts, mostly about how everyone else is wrong but you're always right. You must be brilliant. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"Larry" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose. In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot - including your dumb questions about navigation lights. I'm sure you mean On Topic. OT generally abbreviates Off Topic... around here anyway. ;-) --Mike |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"mgg" wrote in message
... "Larry" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose. In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot - including your dumb questions about navigation lights. I'm sure you mean On Topic. OT generally abbreviates Off Topic... around here anyway. ;-) --Mike Don't post an old link on the subject. Larry will get upset! -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose. In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot - including your dumb questions about navigation lights. Never asked any dumb question about lights. I made several statements. Right!!!!! I won't filter back through your droppings to find them, but I'm willing to bet you asked or said some pretty dumb things. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:49:26 -0700, "mgg" wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message m... nom=de=plume wrote: Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose. In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot - including your dumb questions about navigation lights. I'm sure you mean On Topic. OT generally abbreviates Off Topic... around here anyway. ;-) --Mike Yup, he must have made a typo. Nincdepoop has posted over 4500 in the short time she's been here. I think maybe three that I've seen were on topic. -- John H For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"anon-e-moose" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "Larry" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose. In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot - including your dumb questions about navigation lights. Never asked any dumb question about lights. I made several statements. Right!!!!! I won't filter back through your droppings to find them, but I'm willing to bet you asked or said some pretty dumb things. Feel free to bury your head in the sand, no problem here! -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"John H" wrote in message
... On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:49:26 -0700, "mgg" wrote: "Larry" wrote in message om... nom=de=plume wrote: Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose. In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot - including your dumb questions about navigation lights. I'm sure you mean On Topic. OT generally abbreviates Off Topic... around here anyway. ;-) --Mike Yup, he must have made a typo. Nincdepoop has posted over 4500 in the short time she's been here. I think maybe three that I've seen were on topic. -- John H For a great time, go here first... http://tinyurl.com/ygqxs5v Why don't you tell us about your racist political view again John. I'm sure we all want to hear them. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
nom=de=plume wrote:
"anon-e-moose" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Larry" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose. In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot - including your dumb questions about navigation lights. Never asked any dumb question about lights. I made several statements. Right!!!!! I won't filter back through your droppings to find them, but I'm willing to bet you asked or said some pretty dumb things. Feel free to bury your head in the sand, no problem here! There you go. You did it again. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"anon-e-moose" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "anon-e-moose" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Larry" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose. In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot - including your dumb questions about navigation lights. Never asked any dumb question about lights. I made several statements. Right!!!!! I won't filter back through your droppings to find them, but I'm willing to bet you asked or said some pretty dumb things. Feel free to bury your head in the sand, no problem here! There you go. You did it again. My mistake. Feel free to bury your head in your butt. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
mgg wrote:
"Larry" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: Yet you offer nothing new... perhaps you should post something relevant or comment on the information in detail. Or not I suppose. In my short time here I have more OT posts than you by a long shot - including your dumb questions about navigation lights. I'm sure you mean On Topic. OT generally abbreviates Off Topic... around here anyway. ;-) --Mike You are correct. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com