Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name you're
using.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Incompetent troll.

Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.

"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name
you're using.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Incompetent troll.
Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.




Maybe when you do your search on google you have a way of narrowing down the
14K hits. Maybe when I asked him specifically what name it was under and he
replied Bill McKee he should have said William McKee. Is he William McKee,
Jr.?

He's a liar and you're a fool.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name
you're using.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Incompetent troll.
Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.




Maybe when you do your search on google you have a way of narrowing down the
14K hits. Maybe when I asked him specifically what name it was under and he
replied Bill McKee he should have said William McKee. Is he William McKee,
Jr.?

He's a liar and you're a fool.

Right. I type william mckee disk drive patent into google and the very
first entry is http://news.google.com/patents/about?id=wwAjAAAAEBAJ
All the patent info right there. 10 seconds.
It fits what Bill has talked about before.
Difference between me and you is I don't just assume somebody is lying
because I don't agree with their opinions.
Difference between you and Bill is he isn't lying. Even uses his real
name to post.
Don't blame me you can't figure out to find a patent when you have all
the info you need.
You don't get paid for that, do you?
If so, consider yourself a member of "The Bull**** Economy."
People with no real skill finding a niche.
Most home inspectors used by new home lenders fit right in there.
Most don't know squat about homes, but know the formulated moves to
make, the RE agents to butter up and kick back to for referrals, and
what fee the market will bear for their "services."
So it figures you had difficulty finding Bill's patent.
Be proud of yourself. Nice racket you've got.
And go on calling people names when you disagree with them.
Nobody cares, but if it makes you feel good, why not?

"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name
you're using.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Incompetent troll.
Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.




Maybe when you do your search on google you have a way of narrowing down
the 14K hits. Maybe when I asked him specifically what name it was under
and he replied Bill McKee he should have said William McKee. Is he
William McKee, Jr.?

He's a liar and you're a fool.

Right. I type william mckee disk drive patent into google and the very
first entry is http://news.google.com/patents/about?id=wwAjAAAAEBAJ
All the patent info right there. 10 seconds.
It fits what Bill has talked about before.
Difference between me and you is I don't just assume somebody is lying
because I don't agree with their opinions.
Difference between you and Bill is he isn't lying. Even uses his real
name to post.
Don't blame me you can't figure out to find a patent when you have all
the info you need.
You don't get paid for that, do you?
If so, consider yourself a member of "The Bull**** Economy."
People with no real skill finding a niche.
Most home inspectors used by new home lenders fit right in there.
Most don't know squat about homes, but know the formulated moves to
make, the RE agents to butter up and kick back to for referrals, and
what fee the market will bear for their "services."
So it figures you had difficulty finding Bill's patent.
Be proud of yourself. Nice racket you've got.
And go on calling people names when you disagree with them.
Nobody cares, but if it makes you feel good, why not?


Oh, except that he never said what his patent was about. So, typing William
McKee patent in google isn't going to find it. See my comment about you
being a fool for additional information.

Oh, and you're a bozo also.

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:


Oh, except that he never said what his patent was about. So, typing William
McKee patent in google isn't going to find it. See my comment about you
being a fool for additional information.

Oh, and you're a bozo also.

Right. And you're the incompetent patent attorney.
I don't know Bill, and disagree with many of his opinions.
Don't even read all of his posts.
But he has mentioned his disk drive patent more than once here.
Even in this very thread.
Your pettiness has cost you all credibility.
Go soak you head. Or talk to Cannuck.

"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:


Oh, except that he never said what his patent was about. So, typing
William McKee patent in google isn't going to find it. See my comment
about you being a fool for additional information.

Oh, and you're a bozo also.

Right. And you're the incompetent patent attorney.
I don't know Bill, and disagree with many of his opinions.
Don't even read all of his posts.
But he has mentioned his disk drive patent more than once here.
Even in this very thread.
Your pettiness has cost you all credibility.
Go soak you head. Or talk to Cannuck.


Nope... he didn't in the original thread wherein he claimed to me that he
was a patent holder. You said you don't read all of his posts, yet you're
all of a sudden an authority on them.

Don't care what you think about my "credibility."

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name
you're using.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Incompetent troll.
Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.



I put my name and "patent" in Google. Returned as number two on the list,
the first being a Richard with a last name spelled differently than mine.

I didn't Google using "Eisboch".

I have bad memories of dealing with patent attorneys. When I sold my
company and the buyer began the due diligence process, two patent attorneys
were the first people I met with. One was a corporate type for the buyer,
the other was a hired consultant. Spent the better part of two days with
them, and finally they left to go do whatever it is that they do.

We then went through the (almost 3 month) exhausting process of due
diligence, looking at all our financials, taxes, liabilities, etc. and I was
getting worn out by the whole process. The buyer was a large, public
company and had many resources, including a staff of lawyers, accountants
and marketing types. Any small business owner who goes through this will
understand how grueling the process is and at some point you basically
become committed to the deal, just to get it over with.

The day before the official closing (almost 3 months later) the two patent
attorneys came back with a 3 inch stack of patent copies. They started going
through them, one by one, asking if we built anything like what was on the
patent papers. It was ridiculous. It was like being Ford and the attorney
hands you a patent by Chevrolet and asks if you make anything similar.

The CEO of the acquiring company was a gruff, tough talking, no-nonsense
type and nobody in his company cherished getting on his radar screen. By 8
pm, the evening before the closing, we were only halfway through the stack
of papers that his patent attorneys had prepared. Exasperated, I called
for a break and told them that I had had enough and one of them was going
to have to call the CEO of their company and tell him the closing would have
to be postponed to a later date because we still had a pile of papers to go
through.

The patent attorneys looked at each other with panic in their faces, picked
up the remaining paperwork and stuffed it into their briefcases. They then
announced that everything was fine, there didn't appear to be any patent
conflicts or infringements to be concerned with and left.

The closing occurred on time the next morning.

Eisboch

On 3/8/10 8:00 AM, Eisboch wrote:
om wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message

You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name
you're using.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Incompetent troll.
Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.



I put my name and "patent" in Google. Returned as number two on the list,
the first being a Richard with a last name spelled differently than mine.

I didn't Google using "Eisboch".

I have bad memories of dealing with patent attorneys. When I sold my
company and the buyer began the due diligence process, two patent attorneys
were the first people I met with. One was a corporate type for the buyer,
the other was a hired consultant. Spent the better part of two days with
them, and finally they left to go do whatever it is that they do.

We then went through the (almost 3 month) exhausting process of due
diligence, looking at all our financials, taxes, liabilities, etc. and I was
getting worn out by the whole process. The buyer was a large, public
company and had many resources, including a staff of lawyers, accountants
and marketing types. Any small business owner who goes through this will
understand how grueling the process is and at some point you basically
become committed to the deal, just to get it over with.

The day before the official closing (almost 3 months later) the two patent
attorneys came back with a 3 inch stack of patent copies. They started going
through them, one by one, asking if we built anything like what was on the
patent papers. It was ridiculous. It was like being Ford and the attorney
hands you a patent by Chevrolet and asks if you make anything similar.

The CEO of the acquiring company was a gruff, tough talking, no-nonsense
type and nobody in his company cherished getting on his radar screen. By 8
pm, the evening before the closing, we were only halfway through the stack
of papers that his patent attorneys had prepared. Exasperated, I called
for a break and told them that I had had enough and one of them was going
to have to call the CEO of their company and tell him the closing would have
to be postponed to a later date because we still had a pile of papers to go
through.

The patent attorneys looked at each other with panic in their faces, picked
up the remaining paperwork and stuffed it into their briefcases. They then
announced that everything was fine, there didn't appear to be any patent
conflicts or infringements to be concerned with and left.

The closing occurred on time the next morning.

Eisboch



Sounds like they billed by the hour and wanted to rack up a lot more
hours...


BTW, local paper here had a nice spread about the "third-largest" guitar
manufacturer in the USA being right in our backyards.
Paul Reed Smith Guitars

URL:


http://www.bayweekly.com/year10/issue_9/lead_1.html

On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Frogloogyherringsnacks" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name
you're using.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Incompetent troll.
Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.



I put my name and "patent" in Google. Returned as number two on the list,
the first being a Richard with a last name spelled differently than mine.

I didn't Google using "Eisboch".

I have bad memories of dealing with patent attorneys. When I sold my
company and the buyer began the due diligence process, two patent attorneys
were the first people I met with. One was a corporate type for the buyer,
the other was a hired consultant. Spent the better part of two days with
them, and finally they left to go do whatever it is that they do.

We then went through the (almost 3 month) exhausting process of due
diligence, looking at all our financials, taxes, liabilities, etc. and I was
getting worn out by the whole process. The buyer was a large, public
company and had many resources, including a staff of lawyers, accountants
and marketing types. Any small business owner who goes through this will
understand how grueling the process is and at some point you basically
become committed to the deal, just to get it over with.

The day before the official closing (almost 3 months later) the two patent
attorneys came back with a 3 inch stack of patent copies. They started going
through them, one by one, asking if we built anything like what was on the
patent papers. It was ridiculous. It was like being Ford and the attorney
hands you a patent by Chevrolet and asks if you make anything similar.

The CEO of the acquiring company was a gruff, tough talking, no-nonsense
type and nobody in his company cherished getting on his radar screen. By 8
pm, the evening before the closing, we were only halfway through the stack
of papers that his patent attorneys had prepared. Exasperated, I called
for a break and told them that I had had enough and one of them was going
to have to call the CEO of their company and tell him the closing would have
to be postponed to a later date because we still had a pile of papers to go
through.

The patent attorneys looked at each other with panic in their faces, picked
up the remaining paperwork and stuffed it into their briefcases. They then
announced that everything was fine, there didn't appear to be any patent
conflicts or infringements to be concerned with and left.

The closing occurred on time the next morning.

Eisboch




Do you know to whom you're responding?
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown)

John H

On 3/8/10 8:15 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 08:00:41 -0500, wrote:


om wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message

You're a liar. Nothing like that is in the database under the name
you're using.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Incompetent troll.
Maybe she doesn't know Bill is short for William?
I don't think so.
I had no trouble finding your patent using google.
No "database" needed. Well, google is essentially a database.
Took all of 10 seconds.
But you're probably right about her being a troll.
The giveaway is "under the name you're using."
Cute. A dishonest way to try to cut somebody down.



I put my name and "patent" in Google. Returned as number two on the list,
the first being a Richard with a last name spelled differently than mine.

I didn't Google using "Eisboch".

I have bad memories of dealing with patent attorneys. When I sold my
company and the buyer began the due diligence process, two patent attorneys
were the first people I met with. One was a corporate type for the buyer,
the other was a hired consultant. Spent the better part of two days with
them, and finally they left to go do whatever it is that they do.

We then went through the (almost 3 month) exhausting process of due
diligence, looking at all our financials, taxes, liabilities, etc. and I was
getting worn out by the whole process. The buyer was a large, public
company and had many resources, including a staff of lawyers, accountants
and marketing types. Any small business owner who goes through this will
understand how grueling the process is and at some point you basically
become committed to the deal, just to get it over with.

The day before the official closing (almost 3 months later) the two patent
attorneys came back with a 3 inch stack of patent copies. They started going
through them, one by one, asking if we built anything like what was on the
patent papers. It was ridiculous. It was like being Ford and the attorney
hands you a patent by Chevrolet and asks if you make anything similar.

The CEO of the acquiring company was a gruff, tough talking, no-nonsense
type and nobody in his company cherished getting on his radar screen. By 8
pm, the evening before the closing, we were only halfway through the stack
of papers that his patent attorneys had prepared. Exasperated, I called
for a break and told them that I had had enough and one of them was going
to have to call the CEO of their company and tell him the closing would have
to be postponed to a later date because we still had a pile of papers to go
through.

The patent attorneys looked at each other with panic in their faces, picked
up the remaining paperwork and stuffed it into their briefcases. They then
announced that everything was fine, there didn't appear to be any patent
conflicts or infringements to be concerned with and left.

The closing occurred on time the next morning.

Eisboch




Do you know to whom you're responding?



Herring doesn't like it when posters respond to those he doesn't like.
He actually believes he is in charge of something. snerk