"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...


Please read previous response.

Why do people like yourself automatically jump to the conclusion that
a statement of fact that may illuminate a broader influence on a
controversial subject means that the author of that statement is a
"rightie" or Bush supporter? This is exactly the type of current
political animosity that has divided this country. Now-a-days you
are either left or right apparently. There's no middle ground
anymore.

I have never "defended" Bush without reservation. I have, on
occasion, expressed support for some of Obama's initiatives. I don't
agree with much of how he is trying to accomplish them however.

The first step to getting this country back on track is to stop the
stupid finger pointing.

Eisboch



If that's the case, why bring up something that was always obvious. I
notice you didn't mention Bush the First's invasion either. Or,
Rumsfeld's or Cheney's previous involvement with Saddam. You didn't
mention the British establishing Iraq to begin with either. The first
step to getting this country back on track is to be intellectually
honest.



Based on the few posts of yours that I have read, I would respectfully
suggest that you lead the way.

Eisboch


Really? Please show me where I've done finger pointing without cause.
I've been vilified here for being female, not "beautiful", "vacuous", a
"typical" liberal (which I'm not even), told I'm not a patent attorney, a
liar, etc. I've hardly ever even responded to those posters, especially
not at that level.


No offense, but I don't have a clue who you are, what you are
professionally, what you look like or if you are male or female, nor to I
care. I've only read a handful of your posts. My take is that your mind
is pretty well made up about anything and everything. Maybe wrong, but
that's the impression I have.

Carry on. Didn't mean to interrupt. I have other things to do.

Eisboch

So, basically, you're unwilling to admit that you don't have any supporting
facts... just your "opinion" based on "a handful" of posts you won't
identify. Typical.

--
Nom=de=Plume