'Bama killing more civilians.
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.


Quoting from Wiki:

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement
of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[ It was signed into law by
President Bill Clinton.

The Act found that between 1980 and 1998 Iraq had:

1.. committed various and significant violations of International Law,
2.. had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed
following the Gulf War and
3.. further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security
Council.
"He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an
arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you
he'll use the arsenal.... President Clinton ~ 1998"

Bush lied?

Eisboch

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:22:13 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:29:09 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:39:00 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 3:20 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC
when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary
was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for
the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

Not at all. But democrat liberals will be saying it was Bush;s fault in
100 years from now. And it wasn't Bush that did the last years debt
spend and corruption bailouts. It was Obama that did. Doesn't mater
how you cut it, democrats provided the cash via congress, and a democrat
president is signing the checks.

But really does not mater, just finished reading how congress quietly
passed a bill to prevent the US government from going into debt default,
turns out some of the US federal debt is coming up and no one is lending
them money any more. So congress has raised the ponzip fiat money debt
limit to $14.5 trillion. And many economists believe this is the break
point for the US.

The break point is where it can no longer be expected that the debt will
ever be paid off and still ahve a working government.

Which means be it this year or 5 years from now, the US currency will
melt down. And government owing $14.5 trillion can't afford 10%
interest rates so in fact, hyper-stagflation and a worthless greenback
is looking more like probability than possibility. US will be like
Greece today, beggars.

Nor was it Bush's fault that Clinton railed about Saddam and his weapons
of mass
destruction.

Liberal selective memory, or mammary in nindepoop's case.
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


Another lie from a moron.

No mammaries? Sorry.
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


I thought you plonked me. Yet another lie. Did you learn that from Rush or
Palin?

Do you think plonking must be permanent? Everyone likes a good laugh, and you,
nincdepoop, provide the best.

Maybe I'll talk to you again next month.

Don't hold that lovely breath though!

LOL!
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:44:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.


Quoting from Wiki:

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement
of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[ It was signed into law by
President Bill Clinton.

The Act found that between 1980 and 1998 Iraq had:

1.. committed various and significant violations of International Law,
2.. had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed
following the Gulf War and
3.. further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security
Council.
"He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an
arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you
he'll use the arsenal.... President Clinton ~ 1998"

Bush lied?

yeah. because he was president AFTER clinton

and he had evidence...which he disregarded...that there were NO WMD's
in iraq.

clinton sent ZERO troops into iraq.

you right wingers....so let's summarize what you believe:

-obama's been president for 9 years
-clinton invaded iraq

amazing what you'll believe

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:44:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for
the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.


Quoting from Wiki:

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement
of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[ It was signed into law by
President Bill Clinton.

The Act found that between 1980 and 1998 Iraq had:

1.. committed various and significant violations of International Law,
2.. had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed
following the Gulf War and
3.. further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security
Council.
"He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an
arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee
you
he'll use the arsenal.... President Clinton ~ 1998"

Bush lied?

yeah. because he was president AFTER clinton

and he had evidence...which he disregarded...that there were NO WMD's
in iraq.

clinton sent ZERO troops into iraq.

you right wingers....so let's summarize what you believe:

-obama's been president for 9 years
-clinton invaded iraq

amazing what you'll believe


*I* believe that it's time for most of you lefties to pull your head out of
the sand
and get a eyeful of reality.

Obama is.

Eisboch

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:20:42 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"bpuharic" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:44:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


amazing what you'll believe


*I* believe that it's time for most of you lefties to pull your head out of
the sand
and get a eyeful of reality.

oh. you mean you want us to quit looking at the real world

and believe the fairy tales you think rush tells you are true.

sorry sport. i like to think for myself

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:22:13 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:29:09 -0800, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:39:00 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 3:20 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC
when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even
Hillary
was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok
for
the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

Not at all. But democrat liberals will be saying it was Bush;s fault
in
100 years from now. And it wasn't Bush that did the last years debt
spend and corruption bailouts. It was Obama that did. Doesn't mater
how you cut it, democrats provided the cash via congress, and a
democrat
president is signing the checks.

But really does not mater, just finished reading how congress quietly
passed a bill to prevent the US government from going into debt
default,
turns out some of the US federal debt is coming up and no one is
lending
them money any more. So congress has raised the ponzip fiat money
debt
limit to $14.5 trillion. And many economists believe this is the
break
point for the US.

The break point is where it can no longer be expected that the debt
will
ever be paid off and still ahve a working government.

Which means be it this year or 5 years from now, the US currency will
melt down. And government owing $14.5 trillion can't afford 10%
interest rates so in fact, hyper-stagflation and a worthless greenback
is looking more like probability than possibility. US will be like
Greece today, beggars.

Nor was it Bush's fault that Clinton railed about Saddam and his
weapons
of mass
destruction.

Liberal selective memory, or mammary in nindepoop's case.
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


Another lie from a moron.

No mammaries? Sorry.
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


I thought you plonked me. Yet another lie. Did you learn that from Rush or
Palin?

Do you think plonking must be permanent? Everyone likes a good laugh, and
you,
nincdepoop, provide the best.

Maybe I'll talk to you again next month.

Don't hold that lovely breath though!

LOL!
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


Basically, then, you're a liar. Got it.

--
Nom=de=Plume

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.


Quoting from Wiki:

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement
of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[ It was signed into law by
President Bill Clinton.

The Act found that between 1980 and 1998 Iraq had:

1.. committed various and significant violations of International Law,
2.. had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed
following the Gulf War and
3.. further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security
Council.
"He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an
arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee
you he'll use the arsenal.... President Clinton ~ 1998"

Bush lied?

Eisboch



And, Clinton invaded Iraq when? And, Bush claimed that WMDs where where?
Bush listened to Clinton about anything??? Keep defending Bush. You're doing
so well!


--
Nom=de=Plume

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:44:12 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for
the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.


Quoting from Wiki:

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional
statement
of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[ It was signed into law by
President Bill Clinton.

The Act found that between 1980 and 1998 Iraq had:

1.. committed various and significant violations of International Law,
2.. had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed
following the Gulf War and
3.. further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security
Council.
"He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an
arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee
you
he'll use the arsenal.... President Clinton ~ 1998"

Bush lied?

yeah. because he was president AFTER clinton

and he had evidence...which he disregarded...that there were NO WMD's
in iraq.

clinton sent ZERO troops into iraq.

you right wingers....so let's summarize what you believe:

-obama's been president for 9 years
-clinton invaded iraq

amazing what you'll believe


*I* believe that it's time for most of you lefties to pull your head out
of the sand
and get a eyeful of reality.

Obama is.

Eisboch



Basically, you have no argument other than "it was Clinton's fault." Keep
trying.

--
Nom=de=Plume

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:44:12 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


Quoting from Wiki:

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional
statement of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[ It was signed
into law by President Bill Clinton.

The Act found that between 1980 and 1998 Iraq had:

1.. committed various and significant violations of International Law,
2.. had failed to comply with the obligations to which it had agreed
following the Gulf War and
3.. further had ignored Resolutions of the United Nations Security
Council.
"He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an
arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee
you he'll use the arsenal.... President Clinton ~ 1998"

Bush lied?

Bush invaded Iraq in 1998? If he had, his argument about WMD might of
been accurate. The question remains, did Saddam have WMD in 2003? As it
was, in 1998, when Clinton bombed Iraq in Operation Desert Fox,
Republicans were claiming it was to distract the country from Clinton's
impeachment trial. Remember Wag the Dog?

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:25:23 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:04:28 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:36:18 -0800, jps wrote:



FREEDOM!!! Don't ya know? We're spreading Freedom!!!

Is that what 'Bama's spreading. Who'da known.

It must be hell seeing your messiah doing the same things you bitched about when
Bush was president. I'd feel like **** in your shoes also.

really? number of marines withdrawn by bush: zero

number by obama: all of them.

hmmmm....seems the right winger can't count.

Herring...

Bitches and moans about how bad the government is but never left their
employ. Went from one gov't tit to another. Ended up teaching math
to our kids.

No wonder the US' arithmetic skills are dropping into the toilet. Son
of a bitch can't think straight.