'Bama killing more civilians.
 

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:55:45 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 3:21 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:



Obama is responsible for the deaths of 100s of 1000s of Iragis??????? On
what planet?

Has had 13 onths to stop it.

he is stopping it. number of marines left in iraq?

zero.

And Obama big mouth himself did say at one
point he would end it. I guess you haven't caught on that Obama is not
a man of his word. A polished liar I can believe.

and yet you believe an incompetent liar like bush

go figure

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:50:50 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:50:55 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:30:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk

actually he's not.

US troops are entering an area where terrorists are hiding behind
civilians

and no one killed more civilians than bush.

look at the hundreds of thousands dead in iraq

Well hey, if Bush did it, then it must be OK for Obama to do it!

hmmm....looks like another right whiner who thinks iraq had a role in
9/11

no wonder the right wing is delusional

I wonder why
y'all were doing all the yelling when it happened during the Bush years? Because
it was wrong, or because it was Bush? Hypocrites.

bush spent a trillion dollars and 4400 american lives in iraq

for what?

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:24:48 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:50:50 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:50:55 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:30:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk

actually he's not.

US troops are entering an area where terrorists are hiding behind
civilians

and no one killed more civilians than bush.

look at the hundreds of thousands dead in iraq

Well hey, if Bush did it, then it must be OK for Obama to do it!

hmmm....looks like another right whiner who thinks iraq had a role in
9/11

no wonder the right wing is delusional

I wonder why
y'all were doing all the yelling when it happened during the Bush years? Because
it was wrong, or because it was Bush? Hypocrites.

bush spent a trillion dollars and 4400 american lives in iraq

for what?


FREEDOM!!! Don't ya know? We're spreading Freedom!!!

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:36:18 -0800, jps wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:24:48 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:50:50 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:50:55 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:30:11 -0500, John H
wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk

actually he's not.

US troops are entering an area where terrorists are hiding behind
civilians

and no one killed more civilians than bush.

look at the hundreds of thousands dead in iraq

Well hey, if Bush did it, then it must be OK for Obama to do it!

hmmm....looks like another right whiner who thinks iraq had a role in
9/11

no wonder the right wing is delusional

I wonder why
y'all were doing all the yelling when it happened during the Bush years? Because
it was wrong, or because it was Bush? Hypocrites.

bush spent a trillion dollars and 4400 american lives in iraq

for what?


FREEDOM!!! Don't ya know? We're spreading Freedom!!!

Is that what 'Bama's spreading. Who'da known.

It must be hell seeing your messiah doing the same things you bitched about when
Bush was president. I'd feel like **** in your shoes also.

I sure hope slammer sticks around to add some luminescence to the liberal
chandelier.
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:39:00 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 3:20 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message

So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

Not at all. But democrat liberals will be saying it was Bush;s fault in
100 years from now

you mean 'cuz bush lied and people died?


More like Pelosi lied, and the economy died.

Scotty

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:15:20 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:39:00 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 14/02/2010 3:20 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message

So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

Not at all. But democrat liberals will be saying it was Bush;s fault in
100 years from now

you mean 'cuz bush lied and people died?


More like Pelosi lied, and the economy died.

she's not president. sorry


Scotty

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:04:28 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:36:18 -0800, jps wrote:



FREEDOM!!! Don't ya know? We're spreading Freedom!!!

Is that what 'Bama's spreading. Who'da known.

It must be hell seeing your messiah doing the same things you bitched about when
Bush was president. I'd feel like **** in your shoes also.

really? number of marines withdrawn by bush: zero

number by obama: all of them.

hmmmm....seems the right winger can't count.

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 3:20 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

Not at all. But democrat liberals will be saying it was Bush;s fault in
100 years from now. And it wasn't Bush that did the last years debt spend
and corruption bailouts. It was Obama that did. Doesn't mater how you
cut it, democrats provided the cash via congress, and a democrat president
is signing the checks.

Did you get stupid or were you born that way. Obama came into office _after_
TARP and after something like $1.3T

http://bailout.propublica.org/main/timeline/index


But really does not mater, just finished reading how congress quietly
passed a bill to prevent the US government from going into debt default,
turns out some of the US federal debt is coming up and no one is lending
them money any more. So congress has raised the ponzip fiat money debt
limit to $14.5 trillion. And many economists believe this is the break
point for the US.

Not to you. You're not an American, and you're not even allowed back in the
country.


The break point is where it can no longer be expected that the debt will
ever be paid off and still ahve a working government.

Which means be it this year or 5 years from now, the US currency will melt
down. And government owing $14.5 trillion can't afford 10% interest rates
so in fact, hyper-stagflation and a worthless greenback is looking more
like probability than possibility. US will be like Greece today, beggars.

Chicken Little is alive and well!

--
Nom=de=Plume

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:39:00 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

On 14/02/2010 3:20 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary
was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for
the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

Not at all. But democrat liberals will be saying it was Bush;s fault in
100 years from now. And it wasn't Bush that did the last years debt
spend and corruption bailouts. It was Obama that did. Doesn't mater
how you cut it, democrats provided the cash via congress, and a democrat
president is signing the checks.

But really does not mater, just finished reading how congress quietly
passed a bill to prevent the US government from going into debt default,
turns out some of the US federal debt is coming up and no one is lending
them money any more. So congress has raised the ponzip fiat money debt
limit to $14.5 trillion. And many economists believe this is the break
point for the US.

The break point is where it can no longer be expected that the debt will
ever be paid off and still ahve a working government.

Which means be it this year or 5 years from now, the US currency will
melt down. And government owing $14.5 trillion can't afford 10%
interest rates so in fact, hyper-stagflation and a worthless greenback
is looking more like probability than possibility. US will be like
Greece today, beggars.

Nor was it Bush's fault that Clinton railed about Saddam and his weapons
of mass
destruction.

Liberal selective memory, or mammary in nindepoop's case.
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


Another lie from a moron.

--
Nom=de=Plume

'Bama killing more civilians.
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:49:02 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:39:00 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

On 14/02/2010 3:20 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 14/02/2010 12:38 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
http://tinyurl.com/yhsqavk
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


And I'm sure there are those here who remember you marching on DC
when
Bush
invaded Iraq for no reason.... You are a hypocrite.

What part of the democrat involvement that you choose to forget?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

Don't worry, liberal-democrats do have short memories. Even Hillary
was
FOR the resultion. Go figure.


So, when a group makes an error and admits it, that means it's ok for
the
group that perpetrated the hoax to get off the hook.

Not at all. But democrat liberals will be saying it was Bush;s fault in
100 years from now. And it wasn't Bush that did the last years debt
spend and corruption bailouts. It was Obama that did. Doesn't mater
how you cut it, democrats provided the cash via congress, and a democrat
president is signing the checks.

But really does not mater, just finished reading how congress quietly
passed a bill to prevent the US government from going into debt default,
turns out some of the US federal debt is coming up and no one is lending
them money any more. So congress has raised the ponzip fiat money debt
limit to $14.5 trillion. And many economists believe this is the break
point for the US.

The break point is where it can no longer be expected that the debt will
ever be paid off and still ahve a working government.

Which means be it this year or 5 years from now, the US currency will
melt down. And government owing $14.5 trillion can't afford 10%
interest rates so in fact, hyper-stagflation and a worthless greenback
is looking more like probability than possibility. US will be like
Greece today, beggars.

Nor was it Bush's fault that Clinton railed about Saddam and his weapons
of mass
destruction.

Liberal selective memory, or mammary in nindepoop's case.

Here, Liberals, refresh your memory.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i87cZ...eature=related
--
*I never thought the greatest threat to the American way of life
would be our President!*

John H


More like selective youtubing... try again dummy.

--
Nom=de=Plume