On 2/7/2010 1:08 PM, Harry wrote:
On 2/7/10 1:00 PM, Don White wrote:


No, actually I am very proud

Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.

Now...go stick that hand in that jar of vaseline and play with Jack Goff.

Harry, I am glad to see you are not going to engage that jerkoff, he
seems to know too much about your lies, and would just end up making you
look a sad old man.

On 2/7/10 1:50 PM, Don White wrote:
On 2/7/2010 1:08 PM, Harry wrote:
On 2/7/10 1:00 PM, Don White wrote:


No, actually I am very proud

Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.

Now...go stick that hand in that jar of vaseline and play with Jack Goff.

Harry, I am glad

Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.

Harry wrote:


Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.

Harry, quit "engaging" the spoofers even with this type of reply.
It just lowers the group to their level.
Sometimes turning the other cheek is your friend.

On 2/7/10 2:11 PM, Jim wrote:
Harry wrote:


Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.

Harry, quit "engaging" the spoofers even with this type of reply.
It just lowers the group to their level.
Sometimes turning the other cheek is your friend.


Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.

On 2/7/2010 2:16 PM, Harry wrote:
On 2/7/10 2:11 PM, Jim wrote:
Harry wrote:


Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.

Harry, quit "engaging" the spoofers even with this type of reply.
It just lowers the group to their level.
Sometimes turning the other cheek is your friend.


Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.

You are very smart not to engage these ass-holes, they always make you
look pathetic.

Harry wrote:
On 2/7/10 2:11 PM, Jim wrote:
Harry wrote:


Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.

Harry, quit "engaging" the spoofers even with this type of reply.
It just lowers the group to their level.
Sometimes turning the other cheek is your friend.


Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.


Okay. Have it your way.
But I suspect the spoofers don't want to engage you.
They just want you to go away.
Don't know why, but that's what I suspect from watching 'em.
Maybe if you stopped the name calling and joined the GOP things would
cool down.
Give it some thought.

On 2/7/10 2:27 PM, Jim wrote:
Harry wrote:
On 2/7/10 2:11 PM, Jim wrote:
Harry wrote:


Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.

Harry, quit "engaging" the spoofers even with this type of reply.
It just lowers the group to their level.
Sometimes turning the other cheek is your friend.


Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.


Okay. Have it your way.
But I suspect the spoofers don't want to engage you.
They just want you to go away.
Don't know why, but that's what I suspect from watching 'em.
Maybe if you stopped the name calling and joined the GOP things would
cool down.
Give it some thought.


Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.

In article , says...

Harry wrote:


Sorry, ****head...you're an ID spoofer and here under false pretenses.
No need to "engage" you.

Harry, quit "engaging" the spoofers even with this type of reply.
It just lowers the group to their level.
Sometimes turning the other cheek is your friend.

Pfffft, it's what he is here for. He more likely is doing at least half
of the spoofing. Remember, before the spoofing started, he was being
pretty much ignored, now he is being engaged on a regular basis again,
and having nice conversations with himself

Scotty

In article ,
lid says...

On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:24:48 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


Scotty

This thread has been abandoned. Please move along, I have you blocked.

Snotty

Poor Harry...

FOAD

Scotty

On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:24:48 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


Scotty

This thread has been abandoned. Please move along, I have you blocked.

Snotty