Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
news ![]() On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:41:10 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Eddie" wrote in message . .. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100206/..._care_overhaul If it does, expect a doubling in HC costs by 2019... from about $8K per person on average to $16K/person. I didn't see anything in the Senate bill to stop that. Neither did I, but I did see plenty in the House bill that would. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 10:27:00 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If it does, expect a doubling in HC costs by 2019... from about $8K per person on average to $16K/person. I didn't see anything in the Senate bill to stop that. Neither did I, but I did see plenty in the House bill that would. The house bill was DOA in a democratically controlled Senate. What was there was irrelevant. I never even looked at it. Umm... just as the Senate bill is DOA in the House. What's your point? -- Nom=de=Plume |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 17:19:34 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 10:27:00 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: If it does, expect a doubling in HC costs by 2019... from about $8K per person on average to $16K/person. I didn't see anything in the Senate bill to stop that. Neither did I, but I did see plenty in the House bill that would. The house bill was DOA in a democratically controlled Senate. What was there was irrelevant. I never even looked at it. Umm... just as the Senate bill is DOA in the House. What's your point? It would have been possible to get the senate bill through committee. The house bill would never make it. You absolutely don't know that. In real life I doubt anyone has actually spent that much time analysing the house bill since they knew it was dead. It is another omnibus thousand page pork fest. Except the CBO. If either one of these bills had actually done something to provide cheaper care (not just artificially limit the price or subsidize it by the taxpayer) it might have gotten some traction. Nope. The House bill did all that and more. It wasn't perfect, but it was darn good. We need to increase the supply of care givers if we are going to reduce cost but the AMA will never let that happen. Come on... suddenly the AMA controls the world?? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|