On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:03:27 +0000, Paul wrote:

Great stories Lloyd. As God is my witness I thought a burl would sink and if
I were on the beach with you I would have bet you 5 bucks.


Well, it WAS heavy, but it was big too. Gut feeling while I was rolling it
down was that it would float.

And I admit I used my calculator to figure out the scope and when it came
out to an even "4" I was properly ashamed. Could/should have done that in my
head but you threw me off with the fathoms.

Actually, it's more complicated, which is why I asked the question.
Everyone who answered assumed a flat bottom, which was not the case.
"Scope" gives the angle between the rode and the bottom, but if the bottom
is sloped, it's not the same as if it's flat. In this case, the actual
scope would be something less than 4:1 since the bottom was sloping out.
(draw a diagram to see what I mean...)

A lot of "sail guys" seem to use
fathoms, do you have your depth sounder set to read in fathoms?


No, I do the conversion in my head. I use fathoms because when I let out
rode, I measure it by stretching my arms wide and letting it belly out a
bit - pretty close to 1 fathom.

Problem is, all Canadian charts now show depths in meters. Yuk!

So what is Angelique going to make with the burl?

It's a maze of roots, with holes, windy things, etc. As I mentioned, she's
going to cut a section out of it and put it in her snake habitat to let
the snake wind around the roots and through the holes. I have some pics of
it on the digital camera, that unfortunately was left onboard. I'll post
them as soon as I get the camera off the boat.

Lloyd Sumpter
"Far Cove" Catalina 36