Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
 

On Jan 24, 5:07*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
.. .
Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours!

I'm sure they were all well thought out posts!
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Like I said, you can't not read them.

"Can't not read"? *I wonder if a double contraction is permissible?
Something like "can't't." *Of course if negation is the course for the
day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double
contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't."
Or maybe one 'can't' do that. *Of course, if you're a moral
relativist, everything is permissible...

Jesus has taught us all that being a prick isn't the most attractive
personality trait so what gives with you?

Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
 

On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:39:40 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
...
Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours!

I'm sure they were all well thought out posts!
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H


Like I said, you can't not read them.

"Can't not read"? I wonder if a double contraction is permissible?
Something like "can't't." Of course if negation is the course for the
day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double
contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't."
Or maybe one 'can't' do that. Of course, if you're a moral
relativist, everything is permissible...


English is a living language, and this isn't an English class.

I wan't aware that the tone was critical. Just a spot of fun there.

Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
 

On Jan 24, 5:23*pm, Harry wrote:
I am Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...
Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours!

I'm sure they were all well thought out posts!

More indication that it's actually Harry...

Scotty

Wrong again, ****forbrains...I've been in downtown DC since shortly
after noon, at a museum. Got back at 5:30 or so. Besides, ID spoofing is
the game you right-wing nitwits play every day.

Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to
the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles.

Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
 

On Jan 24, 6:14*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"I am Tosk" wrote in ...

In article ,
says...

Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours!

I'm sure they were all well thought out posts!

More indication that it's actually Harry...

Scotty

More indication that you're not too bright? Besides, which Harry?

--
Nom=de=Plume

D'Plume, unlike you, he is average where you are not.

Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
 

On Jan 24, 7:39*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours!

I'm sure they were all well thought out posts!
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Like I said, you can't not read them.

"Can't not read"? *I wonder if a double contraction is permissible?
Something like "can't't." *Of course if negation is the course for the
day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double
contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't."
Or maybe one 'can't' do that. *Of course, if you're a moral
relativist, everything is permissible...

English is a living language, and this isn't an English class.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Avez-vous pensé ceci étiez-vous du Français d'aile du nez de classe ?

Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
 

On Jan 24, 7:40*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
. ..
Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours!

I'm sure they were all well thought out posts!
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Like I said, you can't not read them.

"Can't not read"? *I wonder if a double contraction is permissible?
Something like "can't't." *Of course if negation is the course for the
day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double
contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't."
Or maybe one 'can't' do that. *Of course, if you're a moral
relativist, everything is permissible...

Feel free to look through all my posts and point out the typos if it makes
you feel goodly.

--
Nom=de=Plume

No need, D'Plume, I'm sure he hasn't a month's time to spare.

Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
 

On Jan 24, 7:41*pm, John Herring wrote:
On Jan 24, 5:07*pm, wrote:



On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
.. .
Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours!

I'm sure they were all well thought out posts!
--

"Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in
others." (Unknown)

John H

Like I said, you can't not read them.

"Can't not read"? *I wonder if a double contraction is permissible?
Something like "can't't." *Of course if negation is the course for the
day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double
contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't."
Or maybe one 'can't' do that. *Of course, if you're a moral
relativist, everything is permissible...

Jesus has taught us all that being a prick isn't the most attractive
personality trait so what gives with you?

http://bible.cc/matthew/7-3.htm

Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
 

On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote:


Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the
time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles.

Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. It's not Harry.

Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
 

On 1/24/10 9:25 PM, thunder wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote:


Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the
time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles.

Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. It's not Harry.


Thunder...it's not fair of you to confuse the morons.

Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
 

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote:


Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the
time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles.

Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. It's not Harry.


That would be "she" is not Harry. :)

--
Nom=de=Plume