| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours!
I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 24, 2:23*pm, John H wrote:
Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Just like yours and mine. You're just about the most thoughtful guy I know. That's why I've chosen to emulate you and post under your blessed name. Herring is a bait fish, right? |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! More indication that it's actually Harry... Scotty Wrong again, ****forbrains...I've been in downtown DC since shortly after noon, at a museum. Got back at 5:30 or so. Besides, ID spoofing is the game you right-wing nitwits play every day. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
"John H" wrote in message
... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
"I am Tosk" wrote in message
... In article , says... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! More indication that it's actually Harry... Scotty More indication that you're not too bright? Besides, which Harry? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
nom=de=plume wrote:
"I am Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! More indication that it's actually Harry... Scotty More indication that you're not too bright? Besides, which Harry? Not me, the "real" Harry. It's the righties who engage in the ID spoofing every day. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... English is a living language, and this isn't an English class. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... Feel free to look through all my posts and point out the typos if it makes you feel goodly. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 24, 5:07*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? *I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." *Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. *Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... Jesus has taught us all that being a prick isn't the most attractive personality trait so what gives with you? |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:39:40 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... English is a living language, and this isn't an English class. I wan't aware that the tone was critical. Just a spot of fun there. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 24, 5:23*pm, Harry wrote:
I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! More indication that it's actually Harry... Scotty Wrong again, ****forbrains...I've been in downtown DC since shortly after noon, at a museum. Got back at 5:30 or so. Besides, ID spoofing is the game you right-wing nitwits play every day. Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 24, 6:14*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"I am Tosk" wrote in ... In article , says... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! More indication that it's actually Harry... Scotty More indication that you're not too bright? Besides, which Harry? -- Nom=de=Plume D'Plume, unlike you, he is average where you are not. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 24, 7:39*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? *I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." *Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. *Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... English is a living language, and this isn't an English class. -- Nom=de=Plume Avez-vous pensé ceci étiez-vous du Français d'aile du nez de classe ? |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 24, 7:40*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message . .. Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? *I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." *Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. *Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... Feel free to look through all my posts and point out the typos if it makes you feel goodly. -- Nom=de=Plume No need, D'Plume, I'm sure he hasn't a month's time to spare. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 24, 7:41*pm, John Herring wrote:
On Jan 24, 5:07*pm, wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? *I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." *Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. *Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... Jesus has taught us all that being a prick isn't the most attractive personality trait so what gives with you? http://bible.cc/matthew/7-3.htm |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote:
Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. It's not Harry. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On 1/24/10 9:25 PM, thunder wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. It's not Harry. Thunder...it's not fair of you to confuse the morons. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
"thunder" wrote in message
t... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. It's not Harry. That would be "she" is not Harry. :) -- Nom=de=Plume |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:39:40 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message m... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... English is a living language, and this isn't an English class. I wan't aware that the tone was critical. Just a spot of fun there. Ok, well, you sure did go on about it. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On 1/24/10 9:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message t... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. It's not Harry. That would be "she" is not Harry. :) Only the morons think that...the problem is, this newsgroup is full of right-wing morons. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:39:35 -0500, Harry
wrote: On 1/24/10 9:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message t... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. It's not Harry. That would be "she" is not Harry. :) Only the morons think that...the problem is, this newsgroup is full of right-wing morons. Of course this isn't Harry. It's Keith Olberman! I suppose, though, it doesn't matter who it is. It's pointless vituperation all the same. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:06:31 -0500, Harry
wrote: wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:39:35 -0500, Harry wrote: On 1/24/10 9:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message t... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. It's not Harry. That would be "she" is not Harry. :) Only the morons think that...the problem is, this newsgroup is full of right-wing morons. Of course this isn't Harry. It's Keith Olberman! I suppose, though, it doesn't matter who it is. It's pointless vituperation all the same. We could discuss your contributions here, but, of course, there aren't any. Of course not. You're nemeses are simply the irritating products of your peculiar delusions. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 24, 9:28*pm, Harry wrote:
wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:19:46 -0600, wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:06:31 -0500, Harry wrote: wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:39:35 -0500, Harry wrote: On 1/24/10 9:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message news:nd2dnT4aFueMnMDWnZ2dnUVZ_uNi4p2d@posted .gtinet... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. *It's not Harry. That would be "she" is not Harry. :) Only the morons think that...the problem is, this newsgroup is full of right-wing morons. Of course this isn't Harry. *It's Keith Olberman! *I suppose, though, it doesn't matter who it is. *It's pointless vituperation all the same. We could discuss your contributions here, but, of course, there aren't any. Of course not. *You're nemeses... Naturally, my nemesis is not proofing before submitting. You also don't know the difference between "your" and "you're," and probably "yore." Nah, that s me! But considering J.'s contributions here, I've seen hsi vids that he's posted about going through locks on the ohio river with his houseboat and and asking for repair tips on a chrysler engine on the same craft, last sumemr i think |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:28:25 -0500, Harry
wrote: wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:19:46 -0600, wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:06:31 -0500, Harry wrote: wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:39:35 -0500, Harry wrote: On 1/24/10 9:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message t... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. It's not Harry. That would be "she" is not Harry. :) Only the morons think that...the problem is, this newsgroup is full of right-wing morons. Of course this isn't Harry. It's Keith Olberman! I suppose, though, it doesn't matter who it is. It's pointless vituperation all the same. We could discuss your contributions here, but, of course, there aren't any. Of course not. You're nemeses... Naturally, my nemesis is not proofing before submitting. You also don't know the difference between "your" and "you're," and probably "yore." Apparently I do or I wouldn't have lamented not proof-reading the post. But that's trivial, to say the least. I'm still working on reconciling 'pointless vituperation' with 'meaningful contributions.' No doubt, you'll 'contribute' meaningfully to that dilemma. I suspect that the Infinite Monkey strategy that you seem to have adopted may work for you, in this case. The odds are in your favor at this late stage in the game. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:34:52 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Jan 24, 9:28*pm, Harry wrote: wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:19:46 -0600, wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:06:31 -0500, Harry wrote: wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:39:35 -0500, Harry wrote: On 1/24/10 9:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message news:nd2dnT4aFueMnMDWnZ2dnUVZ_uNi4p2d@posted .gtinet... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. *It's not Harry. That would be "she" is not Harry. :) Only the morons think that...the problem is, this newsgroup is full of right-wing morons. Of course this isn't Harry. *It's Keith Olberman! *I suppose, though, it doesn't matter who it is. *It's pointless vituperation all the same. We could discuss your contributions here, but, of course, there aren't any. Of course not. *You're nemeses... Naturally, my nemesis is not proofing before submitting. You also don't know the difference between "your" and "you're," and probably "yore." Nah, that s me! But considering J.'s contributions here, I've seen hsi vids that he's posted about going through locks on the ohio river with his houseboat and and asking for repair tips on a chrysler engine on the same craft, last sumemr i think Hey, Tim. I have more vids that I've been intending to upload. I've been in complete procrastination mode, though. I should have more time, now, that I'm back in Peoria. (I've wanted to edit my unfortunate contributions to those vids :) |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 24, 9:56*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:34:52 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Jan 24, 9:28*pm, Harry wrote: wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:19:46 -0600, wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:06:31 -0500, Harry wrote: wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:39:35 -0500, Harry wrote: On 1/24/10 9:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message news:nd2dnT4aFueMnMDWnZ2dnUVZ_uNi4p2d@posted .gtinet... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. *It's not Harry.. That would be "she" is not Harry. :) Only the morons think that...the problem is, this newsgroup is full of right-wing morons. Of course this isn't Harry. *It's Keith Olberman! *I suppose, though, it doesn't matter who it is. *It's pointless vituperation all the same. We could discuss your contributions here, but, of course, there aren't any. Of course not. *You're nemeses... Naturally, my nemesis is not proofing before submitting. You also don't know the difference between "your" and "you're," and probably "yore." Nah, that s me! But considering J.'s contributions here, I've seen hsi vids that he's posted about going through locks on the ohio river with his houseboat and and asking for repair tips on a chrysler engine on the same craft, *last sumemr i think Hey, Tim. *I have more vids that I've been intending to upload. *I've been in complete procrastination mode, though. *I should have more time, now, that I'm back in Peoria. *(I've wanted to edit my unfortunate contributions to those vids :) I'll be looking forward to them, boss! How long you planning on being up there? |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:39:35 -0500, Harry wrote: On 1/24/10 9:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message t... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. It's not Harry. That would be "she" is not Harry. :) Only the morons think that...the problem is, this newsgroup is full of right-wing morons. Of course this isn't Harry. It's Keith Olberman! I suppose, though, it doesn't matter who it is. It's pointless vituperation all the same. Please spell my name right... sheesh. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:31:33 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:39:40 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:13:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "John H" wrote in message om... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! -- "Your honor can never be taken from you. Cherish it, in yourself and in others." (Unknown) John H Like I said, you can't not read them. "Can't not read"? I wonder if a double contraction is permissible? Something like "can't't." Of course if negation is the course for the day, one might be able to cancel a "not" by multiplying the double contraction by a "1/not" ((can't't)(1/not)) to end up with a "can't." Or maybe one 'can't' do that. Of course, if you're a moral relativist, everything is permissible... English is a living language, and this isn't an English class. I wan't aware that the tone was critical. Just a spot of fun there. Ok, well, you sure did go on about it. Oh, now he's fancying himself a gentleman. A "spot of fun." Isn't that precious? Bloody dildo. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:43:27 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Jan 24, 9:56*pm, wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:34:52 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Jan 24, 9:28*pm, Harry wrote: wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:19:46 -0600, wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:06:31 -0500, Harry wrote: wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:39:35 -0500, Harry wrote: On 1/24/10 9:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: *wrote in message news:nd2dnT4aFueMnMDWnZ2dnUVZ_uNi4p2d@posted .gtinet... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. *It's not Harry. That would be "she" is not Harry. :) Only the morons think that...the problem is, this newsgroup is full of right-wing morons. Of course this isn't Harry. *It's Keith Olberman! *I suppose, though, it doesn't matter who it is. *It's pointless vituperation all the same. We could discuss your contributions here, but, of course, there aren't any. Of course not. *You're nemeses... Naturally, my nemesis is not proofing before submitting. You also don't know the difference between "your" and "you're," and probably "yore." Nah, that s me! But considering J.'s contributions here, I've seen hsi vids that he's posted about going through locks on the ohio river with his houseboat and and asking for repair tips on a chrysler engine on the same craft, *last sumemr i think Hey, Tim. *I have more vids that I've been intending to upload. *I've been in complete procrastination mode, though. *I should have more time, now, that I'm back in Peoria. *(I've wanted to edit my unfortunate contributions to those vids :) I'll be looking forward to them, boss! How long you planning on being up there? My contract is for the year. But the project schedule runs through August. I think the plan is for prototype production to begin at the end of May. I still plan on making it down to the lake on occasion though. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 25, 6:04*am, wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:43:27 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Jan 24, 9:56 pm, wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:34:52 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Jan 24, 9:28 pm, Harry wrote: wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:19:46 -0600, wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:06:31 -0500, Harry wrote: wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:39:35 -0500, Harry wrote: On 1/24/10 9:31 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message news:nd2dnT4aFueMnMDWnZ2dnUVZ_uNi4p2d@posted .gtinet... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:54:56 -0800, TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. Yeah, but it's not time to change locations. It's not Harry.. That would be "she" is not Harry. :) Only the morons think that...the problem is, this newsgroup is full of right-wing morons. Of course this isn't Harry. It's Keith Olberman! I suppose, though, it doesn't matter who it is. It's pointless vituperation all the same. We could discuss your contributions here, but, of course, there aren't any. Of course not. You're nemeses... Naturally, my nemesis is not proofing before submitting. You also don't know the difference between "your" and "you're," and probably "yore." Nah, that s me! But considering J.'s contributions here, I've seen hsi vids that he's posted about going through locks on the ohio river with his houseboat and and asking for repair tips on a chrysler engine on the same craft, last sumemr i think Hey, Tim. I have more vids that I've been intending to upload. I've been in complete procrastination mode, though. I should have more time, now, that I'm back in Peoria. (I've wanted to edit my unfortunate contributions to those vids :) I'll be looking forward to them, boss! How long you planning on being up there? My contract is for the year. *But the project schedule runs through August. *I think the plan is for prototype production to begin at the end of May. *I still plan on making it down to the lake on occasion though.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well, J. next time you're down in this area on a weekend etc. let me know, and I'll come over and do lunch with you. Or, that's the offer. ?;^ ) |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
On Jan 24, 8:54*pm, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 24, 5:23*pm, Harry wrote: I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! More indication that it's actually Harry... Scotty Wrong again, ****forbrains...I've been in downtown DC since shortly after noon, at a museum. Got back at 5:30 or so. Besides, ID spoofing is the game you right-wing nitwits play every day. Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. The same way you do, ****stain? |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
In article 95d4a075-f40f-4958-bd58-ab408d771df1
@c4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 24, 5:23*pm, Harry wrote: I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! More indication that it's actually Harry... Scotty Wrong again, ****forbrains...I've been in downtown DC since shortly after noon, at a museum. Got back at 5:30 or so. Besides, ID spoofing is the game you right-wing nitwits play every day. Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. The idea for him is to be quoted and addressed directly. I don't bother. Like most here, I have Harry pinned for years. Scotty |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
|
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
I am Tosk wrote:
In article 95d4a075-f40f-4958-bd58-ab408d771df1 @c4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 24, 5:23 pm, Harry wrote: I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... Over thirty posts in about 2 1/2 hours! I'm sure they were all well thought out posts! More indication that it's actually Harry... Scotty Wrong again, ****forbrains...I've been in downtown DC since shortly after noon, at a museum. Got back at 5:30 or so. Besides, ID spoofing is the game you right-wing nitwits play every day. Herr Krause. With almost an hour from the time you arrived home, to the time you posted, is plenty of lag to change handles. The idea for him is to be quoted and addressed directly. I don't bother. Like most here, I have Harry pinned for years. Scotty Liar, liar, short pants on fire. |
Wow...a new record by D'Plum?
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:29 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com