On Jan 25, 12:40*pm, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article b937581a-9ee0-4347-bcf3-d56d9ea8c1d8
@g1g2000yqi.googlegroups.com, says...







On Jan 25, 10:25*am, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article ,
says...

"Harry" wrote in message
om...
bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:57:30 -0500, Harry
wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:
"CalifBill" wrote in message
of course she hasnt read it in the last 40 years either...

She probably did as she does have a degree in journalism.

Come on... you're trying to compare that idiot in Alaska with a former
Constitutional law professor??

The righties will do and say anything and everything to protect the
reputation of their idiot, Sarah Palin.

no surprise that right wing men love her more than right wing women
do. right wing men think with their dicks and are dicks

I guess if you like to fantasize about ****ing stupid women, Sarah Palin
is the ideal fantasy.

You seem to be infaturated with Palin.

They are afraid of her. She represents everything they hate.

Scotty- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yep! I hate liars, and those who use their power to railroad people,
and stupidity.

So, other than an out of context and setup question about reading, what
makes "you" think she is stupid? Please, in your own words, not some
Daily Hoax or Hollywood blogger...

Let's see.
The remark about Putin rearing his head, flying over Alaska, and that
THAT gives her foreign policy experience.
Death panels
The remark about Obama having In God We Trust moved to the edge of
coins. (Bush did that, then congress reversed it)
Calling Afghanistan "our neighboring country".
The remark about the Department of Law, "there in the White House".
There is no such thing.
The remark that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have gotten too big and too
expensive to the taxpayers (they're private orgs)


Of course I am still waiting for you to answer the 6 questions about you
senators. I know you saw me ask, several times...

Uh, if you'll tell me which senators, I'll gladly answer. For your
information though none of my current state legislators got my vote.
So what you're asking makes no sense. YOU were one of the ones going
googly eyed over Scott Brown and didn't know a thing about his stand
on important issues. If I were going to endorse someone, it wouldn't
be because they are of a certain party, it'd be because of their
stance on the issues.

Or you could just answer with the usual talking points again, or maybe
another question??

See above.