|
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
Take this place and turn it into your own private everything
conservative is good everything liberal is bad crapfest. I've had it. Scotty, you've went and called me a liar without any lie by me. Funny you don't mind it when John lies about liberals. **** it. G'day. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
I am Tosk wrote:
In article5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... How do you know he's smelly? Ever meet him? |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
Harry wrote:
Tim wrote: Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? I don't know what this is about, but if there is any chance SnottyScotty and Herring the Fool will get into big time, I am all for it. There must be more excitement than that in your life. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
"Bruce" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
Bruce wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. And this conclusion is based on what? Surely not your hobnobbing with Nobel laureates. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bruce" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
In article , Bruce846
@gmail.com says... I am Tosk wrote: In article5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... How do you know he's smelly? Ever meet him? No, but he's soooooo schmelley, I can smell it from here;) Scotty.. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Jan 21, 4:09*pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Jan 21, 2:23*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com