| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
Take this place and turn it into your own private everything
conservative is good everything liberal is bad crapfest. I've had it. Scotty, you've went and called me a liar without any lie by me. Funny you don't mind it when John lies about liberals. **** it. G'day. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
I am Tosk wrote:
In article5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... How do you know he's smelly? Ever meet him? |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
Harry wrote:
Tim wrote: Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? I don't know what this is about, but if there is any chance SnottyScotty and Herring the Fool will get into big time, I am all for it. There must be more excitement than that in your life. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
"Bruce" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
Bruce wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. And this conclusion is based on what? Surely not your hobnobbing with Nobel laureates. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bruce" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
In article , Bruce846
@gmail.com says... I am Tosk wrote: In article5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... How do you know he's smelly? Ever meet him? No, but he's soooooo schmelley, I can smell it from here;) Scotty.. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Jan 21, 4:09*pm, "*e#c" wrote:
On Jan 21, 2:23*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Jan 22, 7:04*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , Bruce846 @gmail.com says... I am Tosk wrote: In article5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says.... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE.... How do you know he's smelly? *Ever meet him? No, but he's soooooo schmelley, I can smell it from here;) Scotty.. Not today Scott, the wind is in the wrong direction! |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:32:20 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Jan 22, 7:04*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , Bruce846 @gmail.com says... I am Tosk wrote: In article5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... How do you know he's smelly? *Ever meet him? No, but he's soooooo schmelley, I can smell it from here;) Scotty.. Not today Scott, the wind is in the wrong direction! Trust me on this - even down wind dude - even downwind. :) |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7
@b10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin' http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp- content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned: http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg Sorry... Scotty |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote: In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7 , says... On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin' http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp- content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned: http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg Sorry... That's funny. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:50:51 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:32:20 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Jan 22, 7:04*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , Bruce846 @gmail.com says... I am Tosk wrote: In article5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... How do you know he's smelly? *Ever meet him? No, but he's soooooo schmelley, I can smell it from here;) Scotty.. Not today Scott, the wind is in the wrong direction! Trust me on this - even down wind dude - even downwind. :) Dammit - meant to say upwind. ~~ mutter ~~ |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Jan 22, 9:57*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7 @b10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 22, 9:28 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says.... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin' http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp- content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg "Not Found Sorry, but you are looking for something that isn't here." Oh but it did go as planned. as you can see when I clicked the link this is the message I got. "Stealth, baby! STEALTH! |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Jan 22, 9:57*am, I am Tosk wrote:
of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned: http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg Sorry... Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - LOL! Come to think of it. the guy on the front DOES look like me! HAHAHAHAHA! |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Jan 22, 11:06*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:50:51 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:32:20 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: On Jan 22, 7:04*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , Bruce846 @gmail.com says... I am Tosk wrote: In article5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... How do you know he's smelly? *Ever meet him? No, but he's soooooo schmelley, I can smell it from here;) Scotty.. Not today Scott, the wind is in the wrong direction! Trust me on this - even down wind dude - even downwind. *:) Dammit - meant to say upwind. ~~ mutter ~~- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - "Around the world in 80 days..." ?;^ ) |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote: In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7 , says... On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin' http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp- content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned: http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg Sorry... Scotty You add much more to the list, you'll sound like Olbermann talking about Scott Brown. -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote: In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7 , says... On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin' http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp- content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned: http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg Sorry... Scotty That looks like Tom up there on the hood. -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Jan 22, 4:56*pm, John H wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7 , says... On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says.... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin' http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp- content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned: http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg Sorry... Scotty That looks like Tom up there on the hood. -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. But I don't think he has dark hair (maybe, maybe not) and a mustache (again, maybe, maybe not) So I guess I'm still the candidate. ?;^ |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:16:16 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote: On Jan 22, 4:56*pm, John H wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7 , says... On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin' http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp- content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned: http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg Sorry... Scotty That looks like Tom up there on the hood. -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. But I don't think he has dark hair (maybe, maybe not) and a mustache (again, maybe, maybe not) So I guess I'm still the candidate. ?;^ Now that I think about it, you're right. -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? ....when Obama accepted the Nobel Peace Prize. Its significance has diminished - forever. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
Harry wrote:
Bruce wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. And this conclusion is based on what? Surely not your hobnobbing with Nobel laureates. No, we just hang out for a few beers a a good football game. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
Harry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote: "Bruce" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper. I graduated from MIT. And you? |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
In article 227a52b3-1159-4c95-a5e7-09d0d10c4b38
@f12g2000yqn.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 22, 4:56*pm, John H wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7 , says... On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin' http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp- content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned: http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg Sorry... Scotty That looks like Tom up there on the hood. -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. But I don't think he has dark hair (maybe, maybe not) and a mustache (again, maybe, maybe not) So I guess I'm still the candidate. ?;^ Uh, no... NO MUSTACHE!!! Tom doesn't do cop face;) And yes, he has lighter hair.. You liked those pics huh? ;) |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
In article ,
says... On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7 , says... On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin' http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp- content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned: http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg Sorry... That's funny. Yeah, I thought so.. Missed most of the day today, had to spend the day at the barn with Mama and the horses... durrrr... Scotty |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
In article ,
says... On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7 , says... On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin' http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp- content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned: http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg Sorry... Scotty You add much more to the list, you'll sound like Olbermann talking about Scott Brown. Yeah, but I would have to see Browns face while I was looking into a flame... Scotty |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
In article ,
says... On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7 , says... On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin' http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp- content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned: http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg Sorry... Scotty That looks like Tom up there on the hood. More like Tim;) Scotty |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
On Jan 22, 10:28*pm, I am Tosk
wrote: In article 227a52b3-1159-4c95-a5e7-09d0d10c4b38 @f12g2000yqn.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 22, 4:56*pm, John H wrote: On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:57:50 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article 54be44c8-23c0-4e48-91c3-ad40485090f7 , says... On Jan 22, 9:28*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 1847b9af-2399-4ea9-a5db- , says... On Jan 21, 4:09 pm, "*e#c" wrote: On Jan 21, 2:23 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... There goes THAT friendship (if there was one). You left out , "REDNECK, NRA GUN LOVIN' CHRISTIAN" between republican and fundie. ?;^ ) Well, I could have just called you ugly and been done with it too;) Scotty- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Well... why didn't you? Of coure, you can add that to the list. ?;^ ) Well, I did find a picture of you goin' varm'it huntin' http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp- content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg of course if you remember, that day didn't quite go as planned: http://findingrefugeinyou.files.word.../rednecks3.jpg Sorry... Scotty That looks like Tom up there on the hood. -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. But I don't think he has dark hair (maybe, maybe not) and a mustache (again, maybe, maybe not) So I guess I'm still the candidate. *?;^ Uh, no... NO MUSTACHE!!! Tom doesn't do cop face;) And yes, he has lighter hair.. You liked those pics huh? *;) Sure! Why not? I don't have many portraits of myself. ?;^ o |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
"Bruce" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? ...when Obama accepted the Nobel Peace Prize. Its significance has diminished - forever. And, travelling back to the beginning of time also I suppose. If you can't make a logical argument, stay out of the street. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
"Bruce" wrote in message
... Harry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "Bruce" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper. I graduated from MIT. And you? Is that on the east coast? -- Nom=de=Plume |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
Bruce wrote:
Harry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "Bruce" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper. I graduated from MIT. And you? I attended clown college, in Kansas of all places. I learned to be a great spella. Afore that I attended a 98% African American high school in New Haven Connecticut. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bruce" wrote in message ... Harry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: "Bruce" wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper. I graduated from MIT. And you? Is that on the east coast? Google it dip****. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
nom=de=plume wrote:
And, travelling back to the beginning of time also I suppose. If you can't make a logical argument, stay out of the street. That door swings both ways, dip****. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
In article , Bruce846
@gmail.com says... I am Tosk wrote: In article5085f1b0-0281-40be-adaa- , says... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? YOU SAYIN' I TAKE THIS TOO SERIOUS!?? YOU OVERSIZED ROLLY POLLY CATAPILLAR LOOKING, SMELLY, STATIONWAGON DRIVIN', REPUBLICAN, FUNDIE... How do you know he's smelly? Ever meet him? No, but I can smell him from here! Scotty |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
In article , Bruce846
@gmail.com says... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. Really, I got up a while ago and went in the bathroom and left a loaf of Nobel Peace Prize there... Flushed twice as it is a looooooong way to Washington DC. Scotty |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? ...when Obama accepted the Nobel Peace Prize. Its significance has diminished - forever. And, travelling back to the beginning of time also I suppose. If you can't make a logical argument, stay out of the street. Logical? It was very poignant. |
Scotty and John Can Have At It.
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... Harry wrote: nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin friendshps? Is it really worth it? Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both sides, but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I find it hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I have many friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet we all make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion. The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was that there were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global warming (done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually discovered by scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035... and none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this important paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to debunk the actual science. A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no longer relevant. When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So, basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that renown scientists are wrong or lying or ? Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper. I graduated from MIT. And you? Is that on the east coast? Unless they moved it. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:18 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com