Scotty and John Can Have At It.
 

"Bruce" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

Harry wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...


Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?

Is it really worth it?



Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both
sides,
but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I
find it
hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I
have
many
friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet
we
all
make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion.

The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was
that
there
were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global
warming
(done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually
discovered by
scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035...
and
none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this
important
paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to
debunk the
actual science.



A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no
longer
relevant.


When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So,
basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that
renown scientists are wrong or lying or ?



Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper.

I graduated from MIT. And you?


Is that on the east coast?


Unless they moved it.


Well, you never know.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Scotty and John Can Have At It.
 

On Jan 23, 11:26*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Bruce" wrote in message

...



nom=de=plume wrote:
*wrote in message
...

Harry wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:

*wrote in message
news:T96dnR5w34D9mMTWnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@giganew s.com...

nom=de=plume wrote:

* wrote in message
...

Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?

Is it really worth it?

Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both
sides,
but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling.. I
find it
hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I
have
many
friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet
we
all
make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion.

The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was
that
there
were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global
warming
(done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually
discovered by
scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035....
and
none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this
important
paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to
debunk the
actual science.

A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no
longer
relevant.

When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So,
basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that
renown scientists are wrong or lying or ?

Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper.

I graduated from MIT. *And you?

Is that on the east coast?

Unless they moved it.

Well, you never know.

--
Nom=de=Plume

You should, but you probably will never know D'Plume. For you are not
average.

Scotty and John Can Have At It.
 

TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 23, 11:26 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...




nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...


Harry wrote:


nom=de=plume wrote:


wrote in message
...


nom=de=plume wrote:


wrote in message
...


Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?


Is it really worth it?


Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both
sides,
but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling.. I
find it
hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I
have
many
friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet
we
all
make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion.


The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was
that
there
were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global
warming
(done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually
discovered by
scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035....
and
none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this
important
paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to
debunk the
actual science.


A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no
longer
relevant.


When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So,
basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that
renown scientists are wrong or lying or ?


Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper.


I graduated from MIT. And you?


Is that on the east coast?


Unless they moved it.

Well, you never know.

--
Nom=de=Plume

You should, but you probably will never know D'Plume. For you are not
average.

Average in intellect?

Scotty and John Can Have At It.
 

"Bruce" wrote in message
...
TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 23, 11:26 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

...




nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...


Harry wrote:


nom=de=plume wrote:


wrote in message
...


nom=de=plume wrote:


wrote in message
...


Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?


Is it really worth it?


Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from
both
sides,
but the continued lying about checkable facts is really
appalling.. I
find it
hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I
have
many
friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I,
yet
we
all
make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as
opinion.


The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was
that
there
were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about
global
warming
(done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually
discovered by
scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs
2035....
and
none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this
important
paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to
debunk the
actual science.


A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no
longer
relevant.


When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So,
basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that
renown scientists are wrong or lying or ?


Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper.


I graduated from MIT. And you?


Is that on the east coast?


Unless they moved it.

Well, you never know.

--
Nom=de=Plume

You should, but you probably will never know D'Plume. For you are not
average.

Average in intellect?


No, he's just a jerk.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Scotty and John Can Have At It.
 

On Jan 24, 12:58*am, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 23, 11:26*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"Bruce" wrote in message

m...

nom=de=plume wrote:
*wrote in message
...

Harry wrote:

nom=de=plume wrote:

*wrote in message
news:T96dnR5w34D9mMTWnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@giganew s.com...

nom=de=plume wrote:

* wrote in message
...

Guys. Why do you take this stuff so seriously. Enough to ruin
friendshps?

Is it really worth it?

Tim, I'm not friends with anyone here. I've seen sniping from both
sides,
but the continued lying about checkable facts is really appalling. I
find it
hard to believe that these two (or three) are actually friends. I
have
many
friends who are much more conservative on social issues than I, yet
we
all
make an honest effort to cite facts as facts and opinion as opinion.

The global warming thing is a prime example. Some recent news was
that
there
were several factual errors in a comprehensive report about global
warming
(done by Nobel-winning scientists). The errors were actually
discovered by
scientists familiar with the issues... typos such as 2350 vs 2035...
and
none of the errors materially change the conclusions of this
important
paper. Yet, yet... this is now going to be used as another way to
debunk the
actual science.

A Nobel prize has been diluted and those who have won it are no
longer
relevant.

When, pray tell, was it diluted? Before Obama received it? So,
basically, you have nothing of substance to say, except claim that
renown scientists are wrong or lying or ?

Bruce's CV is a blank sheet of paper.

I graduated from MIT. *And you?

Is that on the east coast?

Unless they moved it.

Well, you never know.

--
Nom=de=Plume

You should, but you probably will never know D'Plume. For you are not
average.

Ya, nom=de=plume, you gotta be BELOW average to reason with top bass
douchebag ! Thats where his mentality level is...Geeeese.
He rode the short bus to school.